Legislature(1995 - 1996)
05/03/1995 03:45 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| HB 195 | |||
| HJR 44 | |||
| SJR 23 | |||
| HJR 43 | |||
| HB 207 | |||
| HB 141 |
CSHJR 43(FSH) FISHING AND SUBSISTENCE IN GLACIER BAY
CSHJR 43(FSH) was before the committee as the next order of
business.
AMY DAUGHERTY, staff to the House Special Committee on Fisheries,
said the resolution was introduced by the committee in response to
concerns expressed by commercial fishermen and subsistence users.
In 1991 the National Park Service promulgated draft regulations
that would phase out commercial fishing in and around Glacier Bay
within seven years and completely prohibit subsistence fishing.
Last year a federal judge ruled that ANILCA did not prohibit
commercial fishing in Glacier Bay National Park, but that ruling
has been appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Ms. Daugherty said elimination of the commercial and subsistence
fisheries in a vast area contained in the Glacier Bay National Park
would significantly harm the coastal communities of northern
Southeast Alaska.
Number 110
RON SOMMERVILLE said there is still a conflict over state
jurisdiction of navigable waters although the state has never filed
quiet title to the submerged lands within the boundaries of Glacier
Bay National Park. The state has consistently taken the position
in the past that it reserved the rights to file quiet title, and at
the same time, exercise some jurisdiction over the resources in the
water column.
Mr. Sommerville said the conflict is over transient resources which
are not really part of the park. Both the subsistence and
commercial uses in there provide very little, if any, jeopardy to
park resources. However, the National Park has consistently taken
the position that it can regulate or eliminate commercial fishing
and subsistence fishing within the park boundaries. So far, the
courts have shown that the Park Service has and can allow
commercial and subsistence within the boundaries of the park.
Mr. Sommerville said it is hoped that as the National Park Service
goes forward with its regulations that commercial fishing and
subsistence are allowed uses in the park.
Number 166
SENATOR LINCOLN asked Mr. Sommerville how he would define
"subsistence use" as used in the resolution. RON SOMMERVILLE
responded that the definition is exactly the same as the
subsistence priority in Title 8 of federal law.
Number 214
SENATOR HOFFMAN noted that one of the resolve clauses in the
resolution also speaks to sport fishing, and he asked what sport
fishing issue there is in Glacier Bay. RON SOMMERVILLE replied
that the National Park Service allows sport fishing within its
boundaries, but they have always taken the position that commercial
fishing and subsistence use have to be specifically authorized by
Congress. This has consistently created a problem within Glacier
Bay.
Number 230
BRUCE WEYHRAUCH, representing Allied Fishermen of Southeast Alaska,
explained he represented that group when they intervened in a case
entitled "Alaska Wildlife Alliance versus Jensen." The fishermen
wanted to intervene in the case because if they were excluded from
those waters it would mean several things: they would have to move
operations to other fisheries and other grounds elsewhere in
Southeast Alaska, which would mean increasing pressure on those
other fisheries; it would have a serious social effect on the small
communities in the area that have relied on that fishery; and it
would have a tremendous economic effect on the region.
Mr. Weyhrauch said when Allied Fishermen of Southeast Alaska
intervened in this case, the only decision that Judge Holland ruled
on was whether ANILCA prohibited commercial fishing in the marine
waters of Glacier Bay National Park. The judge ruled that it did
not and that is now on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court. He said
the Ninth Circuit Court may rule on the case at the end of the
current year or early next year.
Number 275
SENATOR LINCOLN asked if in Judge Holland's ruling there was any
discussion on subsistence use and sport fishing in the area, and
BRUCE WEYHRAUCH answered that just commercial fishing was briefed
in the ruling.
Number 297
There being no further discussion on CSHJR 43(FSH), SENATOR LEMAN
asked for the pleasure of the committee.
SENATOR PEARCE moved that CSHJR 43(FSH) be passed out of committee
with individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|