Legislature(2023 - 2024)BUTROVICH 205

02/12/2024 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

Audio Topic
01:35:42 PM Start
01:36:12 PM SB163
02:10:44 PM Adjourn
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ SB 163 ANIMAL ADOPTION RECORDS TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled
                  SB 163-ANIMAL ADOPTION RECORDS                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
1:36:12 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN  announced the consideration  of SENATE BILL  NO. 163                                                              
"An Act relating to animal adoption and foster care records."                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
He said  this is  the first  hearing of  this bill  in the  Senate                                                              
Judiciary  Standing  Committee. He  invited  the  bill sponsor  to                                                              
identify himself for the record and begin his remarks.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
1:36:34 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR ROBERT MYERS, District Q, Alaska State Legislature,                                                                     
Juneau, Alaska, sponsor of SB 163, explained the impetus for the                                                                
bill and spoke to the sponsor statement as follows:                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
     The  Fairbanks   North  Star  Borough  and   some  other                                                                   
     municipalities   around  the   state   have  an   animal                                                                   
     adoption  situation.  Borough  animal  control  officers                                                                   
     pick up  stray animals and  hold them in shelters  while                                                                   
     waiting for  the owner to  claim the animal.  If animals                                                                   
     are  unclaimed for long  enough, the  facility will  put                                                                   
     them  up  for  adoption.  The  problem  comes  weeks  or                                                                   
     months  later  when  the original  owner  discovers  the                                                                   
     animal  was   adopted  and  submits  a   public  records                                                                   
     request to find  out by whom. On occasion,  the original                                                                   
     owner  will harass the  new owner  using the address  or                                                                   
     phone number provided in the public records.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
     A  few municipalities  in the  state generally  withhold                                                                   
     adoption information  and disclose it if  they determine                                                                   
     that   public  health,  safety,   or  welfare   requires                                                                   
     disclosure.  However, the standard  is that a  municipal                                                                   
     entity  can  only  withhold information  from  a  public                                                                   
     information  request if  there  is a  threat to  safety.                                                                   
     This  requires  an  analysis   of  each  public  records                                                                   
     request  to  determine  if  there is  a  public  health,                                                                   
     safety,  or welfare  concern.  It is  important to  note                                                                   
     that  the  municipality  cannot   ask  a  public  record                                                                   
     requester  for  their specific  purpose  for  requesting                                                                   
     those  records.  The  information   is  released  unless                                                                   
     animal control  has a history  or a reason to  reach out                                                                   
     to the adopter to ask if they have concerns.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:38:16 PM                                                                                                                    
     This is a less  than an ideal situation. SB  163 aims to                                                                   
     solve this  situation by making  the names and  personal                                                                   
     identifiers  of  people adopting  or  fostering  animals                                                                   
     not  subject to public  record requests.  By doing  this                                                                   
     at  the state  level, we  are also  providing cover  for                                                                   
     our  municipalities  who  are  just  trying  to  protect                                                                   
     animal adopters.  While we see value in  public scrutiny                                                                   
     of  government   records,  we   also  want  to   protect                                                                   
     people's  privacy. The proposed  exemption fits  in with                                                                   
     the other exemptions already in statute.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
1:38:56 PM                                                                                                                    
THERESA  WOLDSTAD,  Staff,  Senator  Robert  Myers,  Alaska  State                                                              
Legislature,  Juneau,  Alaska, presented  the  sectional  analysis                                                              
for SB 163 on behalf of the sponsor:                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
[Original punctuation provided.]                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     Section 1:  Amends AS 40.25.120(a) Exemptions  of Public                                                               
     Record  Disclosures.   Establishes  that   records  that                                                                   
     include   names,   addresses,   or   other   information                                                                   
     identifying  a person  who has adopted  or is  providing                                                                   
     foster care  for an animal is exempt from  public record                                                                   
     disclosures.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:39:36 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR TOBIN  asked about  potential complications  SB 163  might                                                              
introduce   for   investigators,   animal   control,   or   others                                                              
conducting investigations  into allegations  of animal  cruelty or                                                              
adopters  with nefarious  intentions.  She  asked  whether SB  163                                                              
would inadvertently  make it more difficult to  access records for                                                              
those providing that public good.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MYERS expressed  his belief that a public  records request                                                              
is not the  same as someone conducting an  official investigation,                                                              
and deferred to Ms. Dolan.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:40:58 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN directed the question to Ms. Dolan.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
1:41:08 PM                                                                                                                    
JILL  DOLAN,  Borough  Attorney,  Fairbanks  North  Star  Borough,                                                              
Fairbanks,  Alaska,  confirmed   that  SB  163  would  not  hinder                                                              
municipalities  from coordinating with  the Alaska State  Troopers                                                              
or animal  control officers  during investigations.  However, this                                                              
legislation aims  to restrict public  access to records  for those                                                              
attempting  independent  investigations.  The  Borough  Attorney's                                                              
Office also receives  requests for its investigation  records, and                                                              
the office  evaluates these  requests to  determine whether  those                                                              
records should  be withheld. This  is slightly different  than the                                                              
animal adoptive requests.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:41:56 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR TOBIN followed up with two questions, asking:                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
•  Whether investigations  always  stem  from  an  animal  control                                                              
   operator or whether entities like an adoption or foster care                                                                 
   facility ever hire paid investigators to look into potential                                                                 
   issues.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
•  Whether this statutory change prohibits  animal care facilities                                                              
   from accessing records if they suspect an adopter is engaged                                                                 
   in nefarious action with adopted pets.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:42:49 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  DOLAN  replied  that  the   system  is  complaint-driven  and                                                              
described the FNSB complaint process:                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
•  Any citizen, including  private animal rescue  organizations or                                                              
   concerned individuals, can make a complaint.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
• The animal control office receives these complaints.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
•  The internal  animal  control  officer either  investigates  or                                                              
   refers it to the Alaska State Troopers.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MS. DOLAN said  that every municipality has  different procedures.                                                              
She  speculated   that  a  private   facility  could   perform  an                                                              
investigation if  it were under  contract with a  municipality and                                                              
acting as an agent for the municipality.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:43:56 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  KIEHL  stated  the  general benefit  of  a  broad  public                                                              
records  law   is  its   ability  to   provide  the  public   with                                                              
information they  might need from the government.  He noticed that                                                              
he  expressed reluctance  to limit  this exception,  then cited  a                                                              
couple  of  limitations  that already  exist  based  on  potential                                                              
risks, such as:                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
•  requests involving  law  enforcement  if  release  of  personal                                                              
   information could reasonably be expected to endanger somebody,                                                               
   and                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
•  requests  involving  infrastructure  if   release  of  personal                                                              
   information could reasonably be expected to interfere with                                                                   
   public safety.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KIEHL  asked if  there was  a reason  the sponsor  did not                                                              
limit   this  legislation   similarly,  such   as  considering   a                                                              
reasonable expectation that someone could be endangered.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:45:02 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  MYERS  replied  that SB  163  involves  private  citizens                                                              
adopting animals,  whereas he  is talking  about the State,  State                                                              
employees,  and State-owned  property.  He said  that, except  for                                                              
official  investigations, he  would find  it difficult to  justify                                                              
why someone would  need access to the borough records  of a person                                                              
who adopted  an animal.  He tends  to err on  the side  of privacy                                                              
when it comes to  private citizens. He explained that  he tends to                                                              
presume that  such requests  are not  made for  a good  reason. He                                                              
said  that  he would  have  a hard  time  coming  up with  a  good                                                              
reason, hence erring on the side of individual privacy.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
1:46:18 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KIEHL commented that was a good response.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Senator KIEHL  inquired about  the specific  language in  the bill                                                              
amending AS  40.25.120(a). He asked  whether this would  allow the                                                              
release of a  record if the personal information  were redacted or                                                              
whether  the   language  prevents   the  release  of   the  record                                                              
entirely.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MYERS deferred  to Ms.  Dolan or the  Division of  Animal                                                              
Control.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN directed the question to Ms. Dolan.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
1:46:54 PM                                                                                                                    
MS. DOLAN  replied that the legislation  is worded to  include the                                                              
records  broadly,   including  other  information   identifying  a                                                              
person. She  explained that often  when an animal is  dropped off,                                                              
records  are  generated  that  extend  beyond  just  the  adoption                                                              
paperwork and  contain identifying  information. This  legislation                                                              
is broad enough to allow those types of records to be redacted.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
1:47:28 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KIEHL  suggested  that the committee  think about  whether                                                              
to  craft  this  legislation  so   that  it  is  specific  to  the                                                              
redaction  of personally  identifiable information  or whether  to                                                              
keep the entirety of the record non-disclosable.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
1:47:48 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN sought  confirmation that although  these discussions                                                              
often  involve  inquiries  concerning   the  health,  safety,  and                                                              
welfare of pets, this legislation pertains to humans.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MYERS replied  that  SB  163 is  primarily  aimed at  the                                                              
health,  safety, and  welfare of  the owners  and people in  their                                                              
household.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:48:38 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR GIESSEL  offered a hypothetical  scenario of a  person who                                                              
is  bitten and  asked  whether this  legislation  would allow  the                                                              
injured party to obtain that animal's shot records.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR  MYERS  replied  that  a bill  passed  several  years  ago                                                              
narrowed  releasable  information  to  the  number  of  contagious                                                              
disease  cases,  such as  rabies,  that  occurred within  a  given                                                              
area. These  records would  not include  personal identifiers.  As                                                              
for  the  availability  of  shot  records  involving  a  bite,  he                                                              
deferred the question to animal control.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:49:50 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN directed the question to Ms. Imbert.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:50:13 PM                                                                                                                    
KIMBERLY  IMBERT,  Shelter  Operations   Supervisor,  Division  of                                                              
Animal Control,  Fairbanks North Star Borough,  Fairbanks, Alaska,                                                              
asked the committee member to repeat the question.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
1:50:17 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR GIESSEL  restated the question.  She offered  the scenario                                                              
of an individual  bitten by a dog and asked,  the owner's personal                                                              
information  aside, whether  the injured  individual could  obtain                                                              
the animal's vaccination records.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MS. IMBERT  replied that  typically, the  animal control  officers                                                              
obtain the shot records, not the victims.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR GIESSEL  sought confirmation that the victim  would obtain                                                              
the shot records through the animal control officer.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MS. IMBERT  replied  that she believed  so. She  said the  borough                                                              
shares vaccination  information with victims according  to borough                                                              
policy and procedures.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR GIESSEL asked  whether SB 163 would change  those policies                                                              
and procedures.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
1:51:33 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN  restated the question,  asking whether SB  163 would                                                              
limit the  release of vaccination  information under  the dog-bite                                                              
scenario.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MS. IMBERT said Ms. Dolan could better answer the question.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN directed the question to Ms. Dolan.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MS. DOLAN  replied that  SB 163  would not  limit the borough;  it                                                              
would be able to release the vaccination records.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:52:19 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR TOBIN asked the following questions:                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
•  She offered a scenario  of a mushing  dog in a  small community                                                              
   that bites someone. She asked how the injured  party would find                                                              
   that dog's vaccination records.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
•  She read Section  1(a) and Section  1(a)(19) of SB  163, "Every                                                              
   person has a  right to inspect  a public  record in  the state,                                                              
   including public  records  in  recorder's offices,  except  ...                                                              
   records that  include names,  addresses,  or other  information                                                              
   identifying a  person who  has adopted or  is providing  foster                                                              
   care for an animal." She  questioned the language  of the added                                                              
   provision, asking whether  any of her  public records  would be                                                              
   subject to inspection since she had adopted a dog.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
1:53:18 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  MYERS clarified  that Section  1(a)(19)  only applies  to                                                              
records  pertaining  to  the  adoption  of an  animal,  not  other                                                              
records.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR TOBIN  said that  she might ask  Legal Services  to ensure                                                              
the interpretation of the provision is correct.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
1:54:04 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN  commented that  it is  disturbing that the  original                                                              
owner of  an animal would obtain  the personal information  of the                                                              
adopter  for the  sole purpose  of harassing  that person.  SB 163                                                              
seeks to prevent that from occurring.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
1:54:43 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  GIESSEL  asked about  microchipping  dogs.  She said  her                                                              
adopted dog did  not have a microchip when she rehomed  it, so she                                                              
had  one inserted.  She  wondered  whether  someone other  than  a                                                              
veterinarian  could access  the registration  data with the  right                                                              
tools.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MYERS deferred to Animal Control.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:55:26 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN directed the questions to Mr. Loscar.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
1:55:31 PM                                                                                                                    
CHRISTOPHER  LOSCAR,  Director,  Mat-Su Borough  Animal  Care  and                                                              
Regulations,   Palmer,  Alaska,   said  anyone   can  purchase   a                                                              
microchip scanner  and use it to  scan a chip.  Multiple companies                                                              
maintain  microchip databases,  and their  policies governing  the                                                              
release  of personal  identifying  data  depend entirely  on  that                                                              
company.  If   the  animal  changes   hands,  the  new   owner  is                                                              
responsible  for   updating  the   registration  data   with  that                                                              
microchip  company.  He said  Animal  Care frequently  finds  that                                                              
chipped  dogs are  registered to  the previous  owner because  the                                                              
adopter never  updated the  registration data.  Since there  is no                                                              
consistency  in how  the databases  are maintained,  it is  really                                                              
difficult. He  stated that  he was unsure  if he had  answered her                                                              
question.                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:56:44 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  GIESSEL  commented that  he  answered the  question  very                                                              
well. She  sought confirmation  that SB 163  only pertains  to the                                                              
State  of Alaska  records, meaning  the provision  has no  control                                                              
over private vendors.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MYERS  replied that  is correct. SB  163 only  pertains to                                                              
State  or   municipal  records.   It  would  not   affect  records                                                              
maintained out-of-state or by a private company.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR GIESSEL  asked if  that would  include records  maintained                                                              
by a private veterinarian.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR MYERS replied that would be correct, yes.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:57:20 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  CLAMAN  offered  a  public  service  reminder,  encouraging                                                              
owners   to  update   the   chip   registration   info  of   their                                                              
microchipped adopted pets.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:57:43 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN announced invited testimony on SB 163.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
1:58:08 PM                                                                                                                    
MICHAELLA  ANDERSON,   Strategic  Projects  Coordinator,   Mayor's                                                              
Office,  Fairbanks North  Star  Borough, Fairbanks,  Alaska,  gave                                                              
invited  testimony  in  support   of  SB  163,  stating  the  FNSB                                                              
Assembly passed  legislation after  issues of harassment  occurred                                                              
involving adoptive  owners. SB 163  encourages animal  adoption by                                                              
protecting  the  privacy  and  safety  of  adoptive  persons.  She                                                              
described an incident  where an animal owner was  incarcerated and                                                              
lost  their animals.  After  release, this  person  found who  had                                                              
adopted the  animals and proceeded  to harass the  adoptive owner.                                                              
She said another  benefit of this legislation is  that it protects                                                              
municipalities  from  potential  litigation,  removing  some  gray                                                              
areas in the Public Records Act.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
2:00:19 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. LOSCAR thanked  the bill sponsor for introducing  SB 163. This                                                              
bill applies  directly to the  operations of municipal  government                                                              
agencies. He  expressed his belief  that SB 163 is  reasonable and                                                              
necessary  legislation that  safeguards  the  personal privacy  of                                                              
members of  the community.  It helps to  ensure public  safety. He                                                              
said that his  community had experienced safety  concerns when the                                                              
borough released  personal identifying information,  especially in                                                              
cases  where an  owner  forfeited  the animal  due  to cruelty  or                                                              
failure  to provide  humane  care.  Those animals  become  borough                                                              
property,  then are  adopted  out. There  have  been issues  where                                                              
former owners try  to obtain information of the  adopters. He said                                                              
there  have  also been  issues  where  an owner  surrenders  their                                                              
animal and  later has  a change  of heart.  He surmised  that this                                                              
legislation  would  encourage  people  to adopt  and  foster  more                                                              
animals because  the bill would  keep their records  confidential.                                                              
Increasing the number  of adopters and fosters  decreases shelter-                                                              
stay times,  which benefits  animals. He  said the Mat-Su  Borough                                                              
mayor and manager offered a letter of support.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:02:05 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KAUFMAN  asked about  the length of  time an owner  has to                                                              
retrieve their animal from the shelter.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOSCAR replied that Mat-Su Animal Care:                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
•  Holds  the  animal  for  three  days  if   the  animal  has  no                                                              
   identifying tag or microchip. After that, the animal becomes                                                                 
   borough property.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
•  Holds the animal for five days if it has  an identifying tag or                                                              
   microchip. The shelter makes every effort to contact the owner                                                               
   before the animal becomes borough property.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:03:00 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR KAUFMAN  asked the  FNSB Animal  Control about  the length                                                              
of time an owner has to retrieve their animal from the shelter.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MS. IMBERG replied that the duration of stay is:                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
•  seventy-two  hours  or   a  three-business  day   hold  without                                                              
   identification or known owner,                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
•  one hundred  forty  hours  or  a five-business  day  hold  with                                                              
   identification or a known owner, and                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
•  ten business days in instances of protective  custody where the                                                              
   owner is incarcerated, and a peace officer delivers the                                                                      
 animal. She said that in these cases, the duration is longer.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:03:51 PM                                                                                                                    
SENATOR  TOBIN  asked about  a  person  who is  incapacitated  and                                                              
unable to  get to  the shelter in  three, five,  or ten  days. For                                                              
example, if  a pet  owner is hit  by a  car and hospitalized,  she                                                              
asked about the mechanism for that person and pet to reunite.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
MS. IMBERT  replied that Animal  Control does everything  possible                                                              
to contact the next  of kin or a power of attorney.  The owner can                                                              
designate another party to pick up their pet.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:04:57 PM                                                                                                                    
MR. LOSCAR replied  that Mat-Su Animal Care has  a similar process                                                              
for  animal owners  in  protective  custody or  hospitalized.  The                                                              
shelter looks  for next of  kin or a  designated party to  pick up                                                              
the animal. If  the person hospitalized does not  have a designee,                                                              
Animal  Care will hold  the animal  until the  person is  released                                                              
from the hospital and able to reclaim the animal.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:05:30 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  CLAMAN  asked  whether  Mat-Su   Animal  Care  counts  only                                                              
business days, excluding weekends from its total count.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
MR.  LOSCAR answered  that  the count  is by  the  hour for  stray                                                              
holds,  whether the  animal  has identification  or  not. So,  the                                                              
duration of  the hold is  72 or 140  hours. The clock  starts when                                                              
the  animal is  brought  in and  the  staff member  processes  the                                                              
intake.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
2:06:21 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  CLAMAN asked  Ms.  Imbert to  offer  remarks under  invited                                                              
testimony.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:06:35 PM                                                                                                                    
MS.  IMBERT said  that she  has worked  at Animal  Control for  13                                                              
years.  She has  been interested  in this  topic for  a long  time                                                              
because  adopters want  to know  about  potential problems  before                                                              
they  adopt.  She  recounted  adoption  situations  that  involved                                                              
threatening  behavior or  dangerous persons  where Animal  Control                                                              
was able to withhold  some records when the threats  were obvious.                                                              
She said  that when  it comes  to a person's  pet, Animal  Control                                                              
has  done  business  with  scary  people,  threatening  staff  and                                                              
public safety.  She relayed the  story of one creative  individual                                                              
who transferred  the  microchipped data  of an  animal out  of the                                                              
owner's  name and  into  their name.  She  listed several  reasons                                                              
that someone might turn over an animal to the shelter:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
• urgent vet care needs,                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
•  domestic  disputes,  for  example,  someone  in  the  household                                                              
   surrenders a pet that has no identification, but the pet was                                                                 
   not theirs, and                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
• owners who could not afford the stray hold fees.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MS. IMBERT  said she  sees many unhappy  people. This  impacts the                                                              
shelter's  ability to  rehome  animals quickly  because  potential                                                              
adopters  worry about  the  previous owner's  state  of mind.  She                                                              
discussed public  media, stating that she has  seen negative posts                                                              
influencing  potential adopters'  decisions to  rehome a  pet. She                                                              
said the  shelter wants the  best outcome  for the animals  but is                                                              
also  concerned about  public  safety and  protecting  individuals                                                              
from former animal owners who, in her opinion, are dangerous.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:09:55 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN concluded invited testimony on SB 163.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:10:09 PM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR CLAMAN held SB 163 in committee.                                                                                          

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB 163 version A 1.16.24.PDF SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 Sponsor Statement version A 1.26.24.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 Sectional Analysis version A 1.26.24.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 Support Document - FNSB Animal Adoption Questions and Answers 1.24.24.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 - FNSB Letter of Support 1.22.24.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 Letter of Support - MSB Mayor and MSB Manager 2.9.24.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 Letters of Support - Received as of 2.12.2024.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163
SB 163 Supporting Document - Length of Holding Prior to Adoption Period 2.12.24.pdf SJUD 2/12/2024 1:30:00 PM
SB 163