Legislature(1995 - 1996)
05/08/1995 02:05 PM Senate FIN
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 20(FIN) am An Act relating to conveyance of certain tide and submerged land to municipalities; and providing for an effect date. Co-chairman Halford directed that CSHB 20(Fin)am be brought on for discussion. REPRESENTATIVE CARL MOSES came before committee accompanied by his aide, NANCY HEMENWAY. Mrs. Hemenway explained that the bill was introduced to address concerns raised by the Aleutians East Borough regarding Dept. of Natural Resources leasing which can be cumbersome, costly to obtain, and widely varied in terms. It is difficult to obtain general obligation bonding without fee simple title or a 55-year lease on the land. Certain first- class and home-rule cities incorporated prior to April of 1964 were conveyed their tide and submerged lands. The proposed bill would extend a right of conveyance for a specific water-front project to municipalities incorporated after 1964. The legislation is supported by the Alaska Municipal League and port administrators. Senator Rieger asked if the conveyance contemplated by the bill would count against municipal entitlements or provide land in addition to entitlements. Mrs. Hemenway said that conveyance would be in addition to entitlements. The Dept. of Natural Resources can convey lands, providing that certain criteria is met. She then deferred further comment to department staff. RON SWANSON, Director, Division of Land, Dept. of Natural Resources, came before committee, voicing support for the legislation. He explained that it would allow the department to convey improved tidelands to municipalities for local control. It will also limit state liability and management expenses. Co-chairman Halford inquired regarding the maximum amount of land a municipality might receive as a result of the proposed bill. Mr. Swanson said it would not be very much. It would be land upon which a dock, seafood processing facility, small boat harbor, etc. is located. Co-chairman Halford voiced his understanding that a municipality can only make application if there is an existing or proposed new lease on the property to a third party. Mr. Swanson responded affirmatively. The Co-chairman observed that while the state would lose the small amount of revenue generated by the leases, it would also be absolved of liability and management costs. Mr. Swanson again concurred. In response to a question from Senator Sharp, Mr. Swanson reiterated that past legislation allowed home-rule and first-class cities formed prior to 1964 to receive conveyance of tidelands in front of their boundaries. The proposed bill would provide equity for municipalities formed since that time. Senator Rieger directed attention to the top of page 4, noted references to the "public trust doctrine" and "conveyance for shore fisheries," and asked for an explanation. Mr. Swanson advised that any conveyance of land by the department is made subject to the public trust doctrine. That ensures public access along Alaska's coastline. The public trust doctrine is a living doctrine-- a common law provision that changes over time. Municipalities must be aware of it at all times. Speaking to conveyance for shore fisheries, Mr. Swanson explained that provisions retain the shore fishery program within the Dept. of Natural Resources. Municipalities cannot start their own shore fish program. The department can continue to issue shore fishery leases if compatible with municipal uses. Senator Rieger next raised a question regarding whether areas below or above the high tide mark would be conveyed under the proposed bill. Mr. Swanson responded, "It's the area below the high tide line." Senator Rieger voiced his understanding that the public trust doctrine ensures that there is no difference in public access, in terms of walking along the shore, whether the state or municipality owns the property. Mr. Swanson concurred. Co-chairman Halford referenced fiscal note costs totaling $40.3 and a revenue loss of ($100.0). He then queried members regarding disposition of the bill. Senator Zharoff MOVED that CSHB 20 (Fin)am pass from committee with individual recommendations. No objection having been raised, CSHB 20 (Fin)am was REPORTED OUT of committee with a $6.0 fiscal note from the Dept. of Natural Resources (Information Resource Management), a $34.3 note from the Dept. of Fish and Game, a zero note from the Dept. of Natural Resources (Land Development) evidencing revenue loss of ($100.0), and a zero note from the Dept. of Community and Regional Affairs. Co-chairman Halford and Senator Zharoff signed the committee report with a "do pass" recommendation. Senators Phillips, Rieger, and Sharp signed "no recommendation."
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|