Legislature(2015 - 2016)CAPITOL 106

01/26/2016 08:00 AM House STATE AFFAIRS

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
Heard & Held
Heard & Held
Heard & Held
        HB 243-CRIM. CONV. OVERTURNED: RECEIVE PAST PFD                                                                     
8:09:28 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR LYNN announced  that the first order of  business was HOUSE                                                               
BILL NO.  243, "An Act  relating to the permanent  fund dividend;                                                               
and  relating to  a  permanent fund  dividend  for an  individual                                                               
whose conviction has been vacated,  reversed, or dismissed or for                                                               
an  individual who  has been  pardoned because  of innocence  and                                                               
wrongful conviction."                                                                                                           
[CHAIR LYNN passed the gavel to Vice Chair Keller.]                                                                             
8:09:40 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  KELLER noted  that there  was a  committee substitute                                                               
available, and he  asked the bill sponsor's staff  to explain the                                                               
changes that  would be made  by it.   He noted there  were people                                                               
available to testify.                                                                                                           
8:10:57 AM                                                                                                                    
DANEEN  TUCK,  Staff,  Representative   Bob  Lynn,  Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, presented  HB 243 on behalf  of Representative Lynn,                                                               
prime sponsor.   She said  many people mistake  HB 243 as  a bill                                                               
written for  "the Fairbanks Four,"  but she explained it  was the                                                               
Fairbanks Four who brought attention to  the lack of any law that                                                               
would [allow a  permanent fund dividend for]  an individual whose                                                               
conviction  had  subsequently   been  overturned,  dismissed,  or                                                               
vacated.  She said the sponsor  worked during the interim so that                                                               
this oversight would be corrected.                                                                                              
MS.  TUCK,  in  response  to the  prime  sponsor,  discussed  the                                                               
changes  the   aforementioned  committee  substitute   would,  if                                                               
adopted, make  to the  original bill version.   The  first change                                                               
was  the removal  from the  bill title,  and anywhere  within the                                                               
original bill, references to an  individual who has been pardoned                                                               
and  references to  "pardoned because  of innocence  and wrongful                                                               
conviction".  Ms. Tuck explained,  "The reason for those removals                                                               
is that if  you pardon somebody, then you're  asking the governor                                                               
to make  a finding  of innocence.   We did not  want to  do that,                                                               
because the parties  who were pardoned could  possibly still have                                                               
committed the  crime, and  those are  not the  ones that  we were                                                               
looking  for;  we were  looking  for  ones  that the  courts  had                                                               
overturned, dismissed, vacated, or reversed their cases."                                                                       
MS.  TUCK pointed  out specific  language [in  the original  bill                                                               
version] that would be deleted  [under the committee substitute]:                                                               
"pardoned", from  page 1, line  14; "pardon under (i)(2)  of this                                                               
section", from page  2, line 4; the language on  page 2, lines 5-                                                               
7, which read as follows:                                                                                                       
               (k) When a permanent fund dividend is paid                                                                       
     under (i)  of this  section, the department  shall also                                                                    
     pay  interest at  the rate  specified  in AS  45.45.010                                                                    
     from the  date each  dividend would  have been  paid if                                                                    
     the individual had been eligible.                                                                                          
MS. TUCK  explained it was  found that throughout the  history of                                                               
the  permanent fund  dividend (PFD),  no interest  had ever  been                                                               
paid out.   She offered a scenario wherein parents  did not apply                                                               
for their  child's PFD, but  within 60  days of turning  18, that                                                               
child  could apply.   She  said,  "Even those  types of  Alaskans                                                               
would not  get any  interest."  She  indicated that  the language                                                               
was taken out in the interest of fairness.                                                                                      
MS. TUCK  said the next  change was  [the deletion of  Section 2,                                                               
the language of which] she said is  on page 2, lines 9-11 [of the                                                               
original bill], which read as follows:                                                                                          
               (k) The Department of Corrections shall                                                                          
     provide an  application for  a permanent  fund dividend                                                                    
     to any individual  in the custody of  the Department of                                                                    
     Corrections who requests  an application, regardless of                                                                    
     the eligibility of the individual.                                                                                         
MS.  TUCK  explained that  the  sponsor  determined the  language                                                               
should be deleted after discussing  the issue with the Department                                                               
of Corrections and finding out "how bad it's handled."                                                                          
8:15:03 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  LYNN, regarding  the deletion  of references  to the  word                                                               
"pardon",  explained that  people  are not  pardoned unless  they                                                               
were originally  found guilty, and  the bill is about  people who                                                               
are innocent.   He echoed Ms. Tuck's statement  that the proposed                                                               
legislation  was not  being introduced  to benefit  the Fairbanks                                                               
Four,  but for  all situations  where a  mistake was  made and  a                                                               
correction needs  to be  made such that  everyone can  be treated                                                               
equitably.  He  said a person could  lose one year of  the PFD or                                                               
eighteen years, and  he stated his belief that  "there are others                                                               
out  there also  who  could  fall under  the  parameters of  this                                                               
bill."   He offered his  understanding that "vacated"  means "the                                                               
thing never happened at all."                                                                                                   
8:16:30 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG  directed attention  to the  phrase, "An                                                               
Act relating to the permanent  fund dividend", in the bill title.                                                               
He  said,  "Unless we  want  it  to  be  used for  anything  that                                                               
somebody may think  of, we really do need to  narrow that down or                                                               
it will be caught at some point and used."                                                                                      
VICE CHAIR  KELLER offered his understanding  that Representative                                                               
Gruenberg was remarking  upon the broad nature of  the bill title                                                               
and warning  that it  could result  in "too broad  of a  range of                                                               
amendments" as the bill goes through the legislative process.                                                                   
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG responded, "Yes."                                                                                      
VICE  CHAIR KELLER  noted that  the bill  sponsor would  like the                                                               
bill to  be moved from committee  today, but said he  is hesitant                                                               
to  do so.    He  said that  determination  would  be made  after                                                               
getting the questions of the committee on the table.                                                                            
8:17:31 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  VAZQUEZ  suggested   deleting  "relating  to  the                                                               
permanent fund  dividend; and" from page  1, line 1, so  that the                                                               
title would read:  "An Act  relating to a permanent fund dividend                                                               
for an  individual whose conviction  has been  vacated, reversed,                                                               
or dismissed."                                                                                                                  
8:18:01 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  KELLER clarified that  the committee needed  to adopt                                                               
the committee  substitute as a  working document before  it could                                                               
entertain amendments to it.                                                                                                     
8:18:25 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG  moved [to adopt the  proposed committee                                                               
substitute (CS), Version 29-LS1279\G,  Martin, 1/25/16, as a work                                                               
draft].   There  being no  objection,  Version G  was before  the                                                               
8:18:43 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  VAZQUEZ,  in  response   to  Vice  Chair  Keller,                                                               
reiterated her suggested amendment, and  stated her support of HB
243.   She said she  had been  concerned about the  interest rate                                                               
and the  pardon provision, but  both provisions would  be deleted                                                               
under Version G.                                                                                                                
8:19:59 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG  said, "That's an  excellent amendment."                                                               
Notwithstanding that,  he suggested that the  committee "wait and                                                               
see  what the  final  bill  looks like,  in  case something  else                                                               
8:20:16 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  KELLER said he was  inclined to "let this  one soak a                                                               
little bit."   He  then questioned  why a law  is needed  to make                                                               
this change  rather than  addressing the  issue within  the court                                                               
system.    He said  he  thinks  there  are questions  about  "the                                                               
ownership."  He said he is  not certain whether "these things are                                                               
untested in court."   He asked whether the people  that have been                                                               
wronged have gone to court to ask for relief.                                                                                   
8:21:01 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  LYNN responded  that  as  far as  the  Fairbanks Four  are                                                               
concerned, they were  trying to get their  sentencing vacated and                                                               
"this is just part of that."   He expressed his surprise that the                                                               
administration had  not come  forward to address  the issue.   He                                                               
reiterated his focus  was on fairness.  He opined  that the issue                                                               
needs to be addressed and resolved.                                                                                             
8:21:51 AM                                                                                                                    
The committee took a brief at-ease at 8:22 a.m.                                                                                 
8:22:49 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR KELLER  suggested there  may be  testifiers available                                                               
who could answer his questions.                                                                                                 
8:22:57 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE TALERICO said he would  like to ask someone with a                                                               
legal knowledge about  a situation in which a  judgement may have                                                               
been vacated, but where there are other charges involved.                                                                       
CHAIR  LYNN  offered  his   understanding  that  "vacated"  means                                                               
"nothing happened whatsoever."                                                                                                  
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG inquired  as to  how much  "this" would                                                               
cost the Permanent Fund Division.                                                                                               
MS. TUCK said she did not have the answer at present.                                                                           
8:24:28 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR KELLER opened public testimony on HB 243.                                                                            
8:24:52 AM                                                                                                                    
MARY ELLEN BEARDSLEY, Assistant  Attorney General, Commercial and                                                               
Fair Business  Section, Civil  Division (Anchorage),  in response                                                               
to  Vice Chair  Keller, suggested  a criminal  attorney would  be                                                               
better equipped to answer questions regarding HB 243.                                                                           
8:25:38 AM                                                                                                                    
HILARY MARTIN,  Attorney at Law,  Legislative Legal  and Research                                                               
Services,  Legislative Affairs  Agency, responded  to a  previous                                                               
question  as  to why  legislation  is  necessary to  address  the                                                               
issue.  She  said under current statute a person  is not eligible                                                               
to receive a  PFD if he/she has been incarcerated  as a result of                                                               
conviction of  a felony  or sentenced  as a  result of  a felony.                                                               
She continued:                                                                                                                  
     You're  ineligible for  one year,  and there's  nothing                                                                    
     that would  let [the  Department of] Revenue  look back                                                                    
     and decide if the conviction  was gone that they should                                                                    
     get these back  PFDs.  And so, you  just need something                                                                    
     in  statute to  allow that  process to  happen, because                                                                    
     they were ineligible at the  time the ineligibility was                                                                    
     set,  and  there's  nothing  currently  in  statute  to                                                                    
     change that.                                                                                                               
8:27:14 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  KELLER said if he  experienced a PFD being  held back                                                               
wrongfully, he  would be indignant  about it.   He said  it seems                                                               
like there are fundamental  constitutional protections that would                                                               
be in place  when addressing the issue of ownership.   He offered                                                               
his understanding  that Ms.  Martin had  said that  the ownership                                                               
does not  happen because  of this  law, because  it's the  act of                                                               
being incarcerated that disqualifies a person.                                                                                  
8:27:51 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG   asked  if  the  bill   sponsors  were                                                               
prepared to answer why the bill is necessary.                                                                                   
8:28:58 AM                                                                                                                    
RICHARD  ALLEN,  Director,  Office   of  Public  Advocacy  (OPA),                                                               
Department  of  Administration, testified  on  behalf  of OPA  in                                                               
support  of HB  243.   He said  Alaska is  one of  a minority  of                                                               
states  that  does  not  have "a  compensation  bill,"  which  he                                                               
explained is a  bill that would pay people who  were proven to be                                                               
wrongfully incarcerated  a sum of  money per each year  they were                                                               
incarcerated.  He said, "It seems to  me that the least we can do                                                               
is give them  back their dividends that they  would have received                                                               
had they not been in jail."  He  said OPA thinks HB 243 is common                                                               
sense   legislation.     He  concurred   with  Ms.   Martin  that                                                               
legislation is  necessary, because currently there  is no vehicle                                                               
to provide  those people  with the  back dividends.   He  said he                                                               
supposed people could sue in court  to get the money back, but he                                                               
opined this is a better way to address the issue.                                                                               
MR. ALLEN,  in response  to Vice  Chair Keller,  recollected that                                                               
about 32  states provide  that person  is paid  a set  amount per                                                               
year for  every year that  a person was  wrongfully incarcerated.                                                               
He offered his understanding that  the lowest yearly remuneration                                                               
is approximately $40,000,  while the highest, given  by the State                                                               
of  Texas,  is  $100,000.    He  said  [William  B.  Oberly]  was                                                               
available  to  testify, and  he  surmised  Mr. Oberly  had  those                                                               
numbers available.                                                                                                              
8:32:36 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR LYNN clarified  that HB 243 relates only to  the PFD issue.                                                               
He  said there  is  another issue  related  to compensation  [for                                                               
those wrongfully  accused], but he  emphasized that he  wanted to                                                               
keep those issues separate.                                                                                                     
8:33:15 AM                                                                                                                    
WILLIAM B.  OBERLY, Executive Director, Alaska  Innocence Project                                                               
(AIP),  stated that  AIP is  a  501(c)(3) nonprofit  organization                                                               
whose mission  is to identify and  exonerate wrongfully convicted                                                               
individuals  in Alaska.   He  said  AIP supports  HB 243  because                                                               
"it's the  right thing to  do."  When  a person is  convicted and                                                               
the conviction is  vacated and the charge is  dismissed, it means                                                               
the  person  was  wrongfully  convicted,  which  means  that  the                                                               
person's PFD was  wrongfully denied him/her during  the period of                                                               
conviction.   He posited that the  State of Alaska would  want to                                                               
correct the wrongful denial of the PFD.                                                                                         
MR. OBERLY continued as follows:                                                                                                
     And I think  it provides some assistance  to people who                                                                    
     get  out of  jail or  out  of prison  after a  wrongful                                                                    
     conviction,  who  have -  in  Alaska  at this  point  -                                                                    
     nothing  else  to ...  help  them  when they  get  out.                                                                    
     There aren't  the services  of someone  who's correctly                                                                    
     convicted and gets out and  is helped by the parole and                                                                    
     probation  system; there  is  no compensation  provided                                                                    
     for the  wrongfully convicted.  So,  this would provide                                                                    
     them  some ability  to get  back  on their  feet.   And                                                                    
     really the  amount is a  pittance compared to  what the                                                                    
     cost  to  the  state  is of  wrongfully  continuing  to                                                                    
     incarcerate an innocent person.                                                                                            
MR. OBERLY  said he agrees with  Mr. Allen and [Ms.  Martin] that                                                               
the reason  HB 243  is necessary  is that  there currently  is no                                                               
mechanism to  correct this  injustice.  He  said AIP  had checked                                                               
when the Fairbanks Four had been  exonerated to see if they could                                                               
get  their PFDs,  and there  was no  way they  could do  it under                                                               
current statute.  He urged passage of HB 243.                                                                                   
8:36:20 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG inquired  whether someone  incarcerated                                                               
out of  state would lose  his/her residency and,  therefore, lose                                                               
his/her eligibility for a PFD.                                                                                                  
CHAIR LYNN speculated  that someone who is  incarcerated and sent                                                               
to an out-of-state facility is  sent out of state against his/her                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG said  that may  be true,  but he  noted                                                               
there is a  specific statute that relates to  eligibility for the                                                               
PFD for those  who are out of  state.  He said he  did not recall                                                               
the situation wherein a person  is incarcerated [out of state] as                                                               
being on that list.                                                                                                             
8:37:46 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG  referred to probate, and  asked whether                                                               
a   person  who   had   been   incarcerated,  then   subsequently                                                               
exonerated,   and   then   dies,  would,   under   the   proposed                                                               
legislation, be allowed his/her estate to  claim the PFD.  If so,                                                               
he questioned whether  it would be necessary  to adopt conforming                                                               
amendments  to Title  13.   Further,  he  questioned whether  any                                                               
conforming changes needed  to be made to  the conservator statute                                                               
to have  someone appointed to  help someone unable to  handle the                                                               
paperwork involved in claiming a PFD.                                                                                           
VICE   CHAIR  KELLER   stated  that   Representative  Gruenberg's                                                               
questions  were  now  on  the  record,  and  he  would  give  the                                                               
appropriate entities time to respond later.                                                                                     
8:39:25 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  TALERICO  questioned  whether the  bill  language                                                               
should  be  amended  to  clarify that  when  there  are  multiple                                                               
convictions  [of   one  individual],  all  convictions   must  be                                                               
CHAIR LYNN  offered his understanding  that a person who  had one                                                               
conviction  vacated, but  still  had one  or  more other  current                                                               
convictions, would still  not be eligible for the  PFD because of                                                               
the pending conviction(s).                                                                                                      
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG mentioned  language  "on  line 11"  and                                                               
suggested  language  should be  added  to  include waiting  until                                                               
after an appeal.                                                                                                                
MS. TUCK advised  that most of the questions that  had been asked                                                               
could  be  answered  by  Jerry  Burnett  of  the  Permanent  Fund                                                               
8:42:27 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE CHAIR  KELLER reiterated that  the committee would  hold the                                                               
bill;  therefore, Mr.  Burnett could  choose  to defer  responses                                                               
until the next bill hearing.                                                                                                    
8:42:43 AM                                                                                                                    
JERRY BURNETT,  Deputy Commissioner, Office of  the Commissioner,                                                               
Department of  Revenue, introduced  Sara Race  as the  person who                                                               
could answer questions about costs.                                                                                             
8:43:29 AM                                                                                                                    
SARA  RACE, Director,  Central  Office,  Permanent Fund  Dividend                                                               
Division, Department  of Revenue (DOR), indicated  that the total                                                               
for costs over the last 18 years is $159.28.                                                                                    
CHAIR LYNN added, "Per person."                                                                                                 
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG  clarified that  he is not  asking about                                                               
the administrative  cost, but how  much the  division anticipates                                                               
would be distributed to prisoners.                                                                                              
MS.  RACE responded  that if  a person  was released  from prison                                                               
after  18  years,  "that  would   be  the  total  that  would  be                                                               
administered to that individual."                                                                                               
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG clarified  that  he wants  to know  the                                                               
total amount that would be coming out of the permanent fund.                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  KELLER  asked Representative  Gruenberg  if  he  was                                                               
asking for  an historical  figure rather  than trying  to project                                                               
into the future.                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG said  he did  not think  [a projection]                                                               
could be made easily.                                                                                                           
MS. RACE relayed that the  division currently holds a reserve for                                                               
paying out dividend money to  individuals who have turned 18, and                                                               
whose parents did  not apply for a dividend.   She said last year                                                               
the  amount was  about  $900,000  held in  a  reserve account  in                                                               
anticipation of  those individuals  coming forward to  collect 18                                                               
years of unpaid dividends.                                                                                                      
8:46:12 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG   suggested  that  the   Department  of                                                               
Corrections or the Department of  Law should be able to determine                                                               
how  many individuals  have been  wrongly convicted.   He  stated                                                               
that he  does not  think it  wise to assume  that the  number and                                                               
amount related to  the people who have turned 18  has anything to                                                               
do with "the prisoners that are in this situation."                                                                             
8:46:53 AM                                                                                                                    
MR.  BURNETT addressed  why the  proposed legislation  is needed.                                                               
He said there is current  regulation, which allows a person whose                                                               
conviction  was  vacated to  apply  within  60  days for  a  PFD;                                                               
however, that is  only for people who had  previously applied for                                                               
that dividend.   He named the two reasons someone  is eligible to                                                               
receive  a PFD:    he/she meets  the  residency requirements  and                                                               
applied  during the  relevant period.   The  proposed legislation                                                               
would  create  [an opportunity]  for  those  people who  did  not                                                               
apply.  He  said the division has already paid  dividends to some                                                               
of the  people who have been  vacated in the past,  because those                                                               
people  had  previously applied  and  met  the regulations.    He                                                               
stated that estimating  the cost of HB 243  would be complicated,                                                               
because some  of these  people will never  apply, some  will, and                                                               
some already  have and have been  paid.  He said  it is perfectly                                                               
reasonable for  a person  not to have  applied during  an 18-year                                                               
8:48:36 AM                                                                                                                    
MR. BURNETT addressed the previous  question regarding people who                                                               
are incarcerated out of state.   He said currently people who are                                                               
in  the custody  of  the state  and living  Outside  - not  those                                                               
incarcerated, but, for example,  children who are getting medical                                                               
treatment - maintain their eligibility.   He stated, "We see this                                                               
as analogous  to that; they're  ... in  the custody of  the state                                                               
and they no longer will be  denied the dividend because they were                                                               
MR. BURNETT,  in response to  Vice Chair Keller, deferred  to Ms.                                                               
Race to answer  a question about how the  division handles people                                                               
who  are  incapacitated  and individuals  who  die  during  their                                                               
eligibility period.                                                                                                             
MS. RACE  said an estate  has a certain  amount of time  to apply                                                               
for  the PFD.   She  said, "We  would run  something that's  very                                                               
parallel to  that, giving  them the  opportunity ...  [for] their                                                               
families to  come back to us  and go through the  same process as                                                               
far as determining eligibility."                                                                                                
8:50:22 AM                                                                                                                    
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG indicated  that "most  of these  people                                                               
are  fairly  unsophisticated  legally"  and  will  require  legal                                                               
assistance to  navigate the system.   He said,  "Otherwise you're                                                               
going to have people  who have been in jail a  long time that are                                                               
fairly disoriented, and  they're given a few bucks  when they get                                                               
out and [will be] trying to  find themselves and find some work."                                                               
He said someone who was wrongfully  in jail for 10 years would be                                                               
owed $10,000 to $15,000, and one  question that will come up will                                                               
be  pertaining  to  taxes,  which   will  have  to  be  withheld.                                                               
Representative Gruenberg  expressed concern  that people  in this                                                               
possible situation would be able to  "make use of this."  He said                                                               
it  would take  some work  to  ensure that  current statutes  are                                                               
sufficient.  He  said there would be some cost  involved in this,                                                               
and  he hoped  there would  not be  a fiscal  note.   He said  he                                                               
strongly supports the  bill, but would want a legal  voice "to be                                                               
legally  sure  that  that  is   intended  to  cover  incarcerated                                                               
8:53:10 AM                                                                                                                    
VICE  CHAIR  KELLER  stated  that  2016  is  the  year  when  the                                                               
legislature's focus is on the  budget.  He expressed appreciation                                                               
to the sponsor  for bringing HB 243 forward.   He said Alaska has                                                               
"the  people's   natural  resources,"  a  portion   of  which  is                                                               
monetized into  the General Fund;  however, more than  25 percent                                                               
has been  placed into  the Alaska  Permanent Fund.   He  said the                                                               
ownership  of  the  fund  is different  from  the  public  common                                                               
ownership  of the  other monetized  natural resources.   He  said                                                               
Alaska is unique in this, and  the legislature is learning how to                                                               
handle the issue.                                                                                                               
THEDA PITTMAN  brought up AS 15.13,  Alaska's campaign disclosure                                                               
VICE  CHAIR  KELLER asked  Ms.  Pittman  if  she had  an  opinion                                                               
regarding HB 243.                                                                                                               
MS.  PITTMAN  stated  that  she  supports  The  Alaska  Innocence                                                               
Project.  She  said she was not worried about  whether or not she                                                               
would receive  her own  PFD after  spending considerable  time in                                                               
the  Lower 48  looking  after her  nephew, whom  she  noted is  a                                                               
Vietnam War veteran.                                                                                                            
8:57:35 AM                                                                                                                    
CHAIR  LYNN  said the  budget  is  at the  top  of  the list  for                                                               
consideration  this  session,  but  he opined  that  justice  and                                                               
fairness are even more important, and  that is what HB 243 is all                                                               
about.   He expressed gratitude  for the questions that  had been                                                               
brought forward.                                                                                                                
[HB 243 was held over.]                                                                                                         

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
1 Blank CS to HB 243 G version.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
2 HB0243 version E.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
3 HB 243 Explanation of Changes version E to I.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
4 HB 243 Sponsor Statement.docx.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
5 HB 243 Fiscal Note.php.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
6 HB 243 Legislative Research LRS 16-132.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
01 Blank CSSB 9 v.W.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
02 SB0009A.PDF HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
03 SB 9 SPONSOR STATEMENT.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
04 SB 9 Repealed Language.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
05 SB 9 Elections Income from Political Ads.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
06 SB 9 LRS Interagency Info Share Agrmnts - Div. of Elections.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
07 SB 9 Legal Memo.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
08 SB 9 ERIC FQA1.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
09 SB 9 ERIC FQA2.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
10 SB 9 Electronic Registration Information Center.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
11 SB 9 ERIC_Tech_and_Security_Brief_v2.1.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
12 SB9 Letter of Support - Treadwell.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9
01a Blank CS HB 217 ver N.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
01b HB 217 v.H original version.PDF HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
02 HB 217 Sponsor Statement.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
03 HB 217 Sectional Analysis.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
04 HB 217 Supporting Documents-Email Amy Erickson 10-29-2015.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
05 HB 217 Supporting Documents-Email Coleen Greenshields 7-14-2015.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
06 HB 217 Supporting Documents-Memo Legislative Legal 9-23-2015.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
07 HB 217 Supporting Documents-Memo NCSL 7-16-2015.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
08 HB 217 Supporting Documents-Research Report 1-8-2015.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
09 HB 217 Supporting Documents-Spreadsheet Speciality License Plate Sales 1-20-2015.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
10 HB 217 fiscal Note.php.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 217
7 HB 243 Explanation of Changes version E to G.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
HB 243
13 SB9 Fiscal Note OOG.pdf HSTA 1/26/2016 8:00:00 AM
SB 9