Legislature(2017 - 2018)BARNES 124

03/09/2018 01:00 PM House RESOURCES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ HB 27 HIGH-RISK CHEMICALS FOR CHILD EXPOSURE TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+ HB 330 DNR: DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFO TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
+= HB 355 FIRE;FOREST LAND; CRIMES;FIRE PREVENTION TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 355(RES) Out of Committee
-- Testimony <Invitation Only> --
          HB 330-DNR: DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFO                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:54:35 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR TARR  announced that the  final order of  business would                                                               
be  CS FOR  HOUSE  BILL  NO. 330(JUD),  "An  Act authorizing  the                                                               
commissioner  of  natural   resources  to  disclose  confidential                                                               
information during a royalty or  net profit share audit or appeal                                                               
and  issue  a protective  order  limiting  the persons  who  have                                                               
access to the confidential information."                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
2:55:19 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
TIM BISSON,  Audit Section Manager,  Central Office,  Division of                                                               
Oil  and   Gas,  Department  of   Natural  Resources,   shared  a                                                               
PowerPoint titled "Protective  Orders."  He stated  that he works                                                               
with  a team  of  nine  auditors to  audit  state royalties,  net                                                               
profit  share  payments, and  federal  royalties  for the  Alaska                                                               
Department of Revenue.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:55:38 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON reviewed slide 3,  "Royalty Audit Section," which read                                                               
as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
     ? The  Royalty Audit  Section conducts audits  of state                                                                    
     royalty  and net  profit payments,  as well  as Federal                                                                    
     royalties received from leases within Alaska.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
     ? Since FY03,  the section has conducted  91 audits and                                                                    
     collected an  additional $270.6 million as  a result of                                                                    
     audited payments                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     ? The most  common audit issues found  during a royalty                                                                    
     audit  include  incorrect  marine/pipeline  deductions,                                                                    
     incorrect starting values, and "higher of" calculation                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON said  that the "higher of" calculation  was the reason                                                               
for HB 330.                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
2:56:11 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BISSON referred  to slide  3,  "Computing Royalties,"  which                                                               
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     ? Oil  and Gas  leases determine  the royalty  rate and                                                                    
     the  method for  calculating  royalty  payments to  the                                                                    
     state                                                                                                                      
     ? Statutory minimum royalty rate is 12.5%                                                                                  
     ? All leases  define value in relation to  the sales of                                                                    
     other producers'                                                                                                           
     ? DNR's royalty  is the higher of  several values under                                                                    
     the lease  terms, including  the lessee's  field price,                                                                    
     the  posted  field price  and  an  average value  which                                                                    
     includes other lessees' field prices.                                                                                      
     ?   Higher   of   calculations  use   other   producers                                                                    
     confidential sales information                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON stated that in order to arrive at the average of the                                                                 
other producer's field prices, the division uses confidential                                                                   
sales information.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
2:57:00 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON referred to slide 4, "WHY HB 330," which read as                                                                     
follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
     ? Royalty  Audit Section  relies on  confidential price                                                                    
     information from other producers                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Lease provisions  require producers  to share  price                                                                    
     information with the Division                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
     ?  When  an  audit  is appealed  to  the  Commissioner,                                                                    
     access  to   confidential  sales  information   by  the                                                                    
     audited producer  is necessary  to provide  the auditee                                                                    
     with the higher of audit calculation                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Other producers  have refused  to voluntarily  allow                                                                    
     the  Division to  share confidential  price information                                                                    
     with  the audited  producer in  connection with  audits                                                                    
     even  when a  confidentiality  agreement would  protect                                                                    
     the information and limits its disclosure                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Currently   seven  royalty  audits   totaling  $39.2                                                                    
     million are pending due to confidentiality concerns                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
2:57:26 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON reviewed  slide 4, noting that  the Royalty Audit                                                                    
Section used  confidential price information  from producers                                                                    
when  it conducted  audits.   The  lease provisions  require                                                                    
producers to submit their sales  contract invoices and other                                                                    
data to  be verified.   Once the  audit was finished,  if it                                                                    
had a "higher up" claim,  the audited lessee would naturally                                                                    
ask  to  examine  the supporting  audit  information,  which                                                                    
often contained confidential sales  data in the calculation,                                                                    
he  said.   He  indicated  he  would  refer to  the  audited                                                                    
producer as the "audited lessee"  and to the other producers                                                                    
as  the  "disclosing lessee,"  since  it  is the  disclosing                                                                    
lessee's information that the division will be disclosing.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BISSON  described  the audit  process,  such  that  the                                                                    
division would  talk to the  disclosing lessee and  ask them                                                                    
if  the  division  can  disclose  the  information  using  a                                                                    
confidentiality  agreement to  the  audited  lessee.   Often                                                                    
times the  [disclosing lessee]  would object.   He  said the                                                                    
division  does not  have  a really  great  way forward  from                                                                    
there.    The audit  division  believes  that HB  330  would                                                                    
provide the division with a good solution, he said.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON  reported that currently, the  division has seven                                                                    
royalty  audits  in  the appeal  process  with  "higher  up"                                                                    
claims  of roughly  $39.2  million and  as  more audits  are                                                                    
completed, the figures will increase.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
2:58:34 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON referred to slide 5, "What are Protective Orders,"                                                                   
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
      ? Protective orders are common tools used by courts,                                                                      
       arbitrators, and certain agencies (Administration,                                                                       
     Revenue)                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
     ? A typical protective order limits:                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
         o Access  who can view/access the information                                                                          
          o Use  what the specific use of the information                                                                       
          may be                                                                                                                
          o Distribution     narrows distribution of the                                                                        
          information                                                                                                           
          o Disposition at the end of use  directs return                                                                       
          or destruction of information                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     ? Under HB330:                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
          o Commissioner determines disclosure is necessary                                                                     
          o Notice is given to the owner of the information                                                                     
          o Commissioner issues protective order w/ limits                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON  said the solution  was a protective order  to be                                                                    
issued  by the  commissioner  of the  Department of  Natural                                                                    
Resources.   He  read  slide 5,  which discusses  protective                                                                    
orders.  He explained that  the Department of Revenue (DOR),                                                                    
for oil and gas tax  production purposes has a similar right                                                                    
to issue protective orders with similar lessees.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON added that the  protective order would be limited                                                                    
to providing a solution to the  audit with a narrow scope to                                                                    
those  working   on  the  resolution.     At  the   end  the                                                                    
information  would  be  sent back  or  destroyed,  he  said.                                                                    
Under HB  330, the  commissioner would  determine disclosure                                                                    
was  needed, when  an audited  lessee wanted  to see  backup                                                                    
used for  the "higher up"  claim.  The audit  division would                                                                    
give notice  to the  disclosing lessee informing  the lessee                                                                    
the  information the  audit division  intended to  disclose.                                                                    
It would  give the  disclosing lessee  an opportunity  to be                                                                    
heard,  he  said.   The  disclosing  lessee would  file  any                                                                    
objections  and  the  audit  section  of  the  oil  and  gas                                                                    
division would  work through them.   The  commissioner would                                                                    
ultimately  issue   the  protective  order   describing  any                                                                    
limits, he said.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
3:00:01 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON referred to slide 6, "HJUD Amendments," which read as                                                                
follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
       Two amendments were adopted in the House Judiciary                                                                       
     committee                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
     1. Technical changes, to                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
          ?  limit the  applicability of  this power  to oil                                                                    
          and gas issues,                                                                                                       
          ?  to  clarify  that  the word  "lease"  does  not                                                                    
          modify   the  words   "appeal"  or   "request  for                                                                    
          reconsideration,"  (this  change   was  mooted  by                                                                    
          amendment 2) and                                                                                                      
          ?  to  ensure that  net  profit  share audits  are                                                                    
          captured  by this  section,  as  net profit  share                                                                    
          payments are not considered royalty payments                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
      2. Narrowed the scope of the bill to royalty audits                                                                       
     only.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
          ?  The  bill   previously  included  geologic  and                                                                    
          geophysical data under protective order                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON reviewed  slide 6, stating that  the initial bill                                                                    
was  for  the  whole  department  and  the  House  Judiciary                                                                    
Committee  adopted  two  amendments.   The  House  Judiciary                                                                    
Committee narrowed the  scope in Amendment 1 to  oil and gas                                                                    
issues.   It clarified the  meaning of "lease" to  ensure it                                                                    
did not  modify "appeal"  or "request  for reconsideration."                                                                    
It added the term "net  profit share payments" to be certain                                                                    
those were also captured.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON  stated that  Amendment 2  narrowed the  scope of                                                                    
the bill to  royalty audits only.  Previously  it could have                                                                    
been used for geological or physical data, he said.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
3:00:51 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON referred to slide 7, "HB330," which read as follows                                                                  
[original punctuation provided]:                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
     Section 1:                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     New  provision adding  to the  Commissioner of  Natural                                                                    
     Resources  duties  and  powers to  include  determining                                                                    
     whether a disclosure is required  for a royalty or NPSL                                                                    
     audit, appeal or reconsideration                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
     Mandates   that   if    the   commissioner   determines                                                                    
     disclosure is  necessary, notice and opportunity  to be                                                                    
     heard  must be  provided to  those affected  Allows the                                                                    
     commissioner to  issue a protective order  limiting the                                                                    
     persons who may have access  to the information and the                                                                    
     purposes for which it must be used                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
     Section 2:                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     Conforming  language to  allow protective  order to  be                                                                    
     issued  as  it  relates  to  cost  data  and  financial                                                                    
     information  submitted  in   support  of  applications,                                                                    
     bonds, leases and similar items                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
     Section 3:                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
     Conforming   language   to    statutes   dealing   with                                                                    
     punishment   for  divulging   confidential  information                                                                    
     allowing  for protective  orders  to view  confidential                                                                    
     information during royalty or NPSL audits or appeals                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BISSON paraphrased  the section-by-section  analysis of  the                                                               
bill as reflected on slide 7.                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
3:01:44 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  BIRCH  asked  how   the  calculation  worked  for                                                               
"royalty in kind."   He related his understanding  that the state                                                               
reserves an option to have barrels of oil rather than a check.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON  explained that this only  applied to royalty-in-value                                                               
barrels.   The royalty-in-kind was  totally separate  and covered                                                               
by contract.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
3:02:19 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE BIRCH  mused that  it was a  different arrangement                                                               
depending on the location, contract, and producer.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON  responded that the royalty-in-kind  contract requires                                                               
the division to do nominations  for those barrels; and everything                                                               
remaining outside the royalty-in-kind  contract would be taken in                                                               
value.   The companies  sell the  barrels and  pay the  state its                                                               
royalties, he said.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
3:02:46 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON  directed attention  to  slide  4, bullet  4,                                                               
which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
     ?  Other producers  have refused  to voluntarily  allow                                                                    
     the  Division to  share confidential  price information                                                                    
     with  the audited  producer in  connection with  audits                                                                    
     even  when a  confidentiality  agreement would  protect                                                                    
     the information and limits its disclosure                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR  JOSEPHSON recalled  him  stating  that other  producers                                                               
have not  voluntarily allowed the  sharing of  confidential price                                                               
information.   He asked  if they  could be  compelled or  was the                                                               
bill   about   assuaging    their   concerns   with   proprietary                                                               
information, so everyone agrees by consent to do so.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR.  BISSON  responded  that  the  solutions  the  Royalty  Audit                                                               
Section currently has  would require them to  obtain a protective                                                               
order in court and the audit  section of the oil and gas division                                                               
does  not want  to  do so  because  it takes  up  the court,  the                                                               
division, and the  company's time.  The proposed  HB 330 provides                                                               
the preferred method, he said.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
3:03:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  asked if everyone was  on the same page.   He                                                               
asked whether there was any prearrangement as to the language.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON  explained that the audit  section of the oil  and gas                                                               
division  has used  some confidentiality  agreements in  the past                                                               
and has used language that has been acceptable to companies.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
3:04:42 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE PARISH  asked about  the $39.2 million  in pending                                                               
audits on slide  4 and if any were concerned  about geological or                                                               
geophysical data.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON answered  no; that the auditors do  not use geological                                                               
or geophysical data for the "higher up" claims.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
3:05:07 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  DRUMMOND asked  if the  state would  realize more                                                               
revenue if the bill passed and issue was resolved.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON answered that the  bill would create an opportunity to                                                               
resolve the audits.  He  acknowledged that other issues exist, so                                                               
he could not  answer.  He offered his belief  that the bill would                                                               
remove a current hurdle for auditors.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  DRUMMOND  acknowledged  that HB  330  would  help                                                               
resolve audits.                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON said he hoped so.                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
3:05:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  PARISH   asked  if  outstanding   royalty  monies                                                               
collected interest.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MR. BISSON answered yes.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
3:06:19 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
KARA  MORIARTY,  President/CEO,  Alaska  Oil  &  Gas  Association                                                               
(AOGA),   stated  that   AOGA,  a   private  trade   association,                                                               
represented  the majority  of oil  and gas  producers, explorers,                                                               
refiners  and  transporters  of  oil  and gas.    She  said  AOGA                                                               
recognizes the administration's efforts  to address the potential                                                               
issues surrounding royalty audits and appeals.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
3:07:09 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. MORIARTY  said unfortunately,  the AOGA  does not  support HB
330 in its current form and  has conveyed the two concerns to the                                                               
Department  of  Natural  Resources.     If  these  concerns  were                                                               
addressed, it would provide further  clarity for the stakeholders                                                               
while preserving the administration's  intent as expressed in the                                                               
transmittal letter and by today's presentation, she said.                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MS.  MORIARTY  highlighted two  concerns:    HB 330  should  have                                                               
language  to  exempt  royalty settlement  agreements  from  being                                                               
included as  part of these efforts.   The reason AOGA  would like                                                               
this  was because  these  agreements  are contractual  agreements                                                               
between the  state and  the company  and vary  based on  terms of                                                               
agreement.   Royalty  settlement agreements  often contain  other                                                               
legal  restrictions  regarding  the  disclosure  of  confidential                                                               
information to a party not  subject to the contractual agreement.                                                               
She  offered   her  belief  that  exempting   royalty  settlement                                                               
agreements  would  not  interfere  with what  DNR  is  trying  to                                                               
achieve.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
3:08:31 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MS. MORIARTY  explained the second  concern, such that it  was in                                                               
regard to which  individuals from the parties  involved under the                                                               
protective order  would have  access to  confidential information                                                               
during a royalty audit or appeal.   The AOGA believes that HB 330                                                               
should limit  release of confidential  information to  only those                                                               
individuals who  are directly  involved in  the royalty  audit or                                                               
appeal and  not those  individuals who may  work outside  of such                                                               
matters.  She suggested that  the language should be tightened up                                                               
to  limit  the release  of  the  confidential information  during                                                               
these  types  of  audits  or  appeals to  those  people  who  are                                                               
actually working on  the protective order.  The AOGA  has kept an                                                               
open dialogue  with the DNR since  the bill was introduced.   She                                                               
reiterated that  AOGA cannot support  the current version  of the                                                               
bill  but would  like to  continue to  work toward  resolution of                                                               
these two issues, she said.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
3:09:52 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON  asked if those  concerns had been  brought to                                                               
House Judiciary Standing Committee.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
MS. MORIARTY  answered no; because  the House  Judiciary Standing                                                               
Committee  hearing  happened  pretty   quickly,  and  the  member                                                               
companies had  not fully  analyzed the bill  at that  time public                                                               
testimony was scheduled.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CO-CHAIR JOSEPHSON understood how that could happen.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
[HB 330 was held over.]                                                                                                         

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 355 Amendment Four - D.6 - Rep. Rauscher 3.2.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Amendment Five - D.7 - 3.2.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Amendment Seven - Rep. Rauscher 3.7.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Sectional Analysis 2.21.18.pdf HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Sponsor Statement 2.21.18.pdf HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Supporting Document- Expanded One Pager 2.21.18.pdf HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Ver A 2.21.18.pdf HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
Law Fiscal Note, HB 355.pdf HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Supporting Document- Alaska Fire Chiefs Letter of Support 2.28.18.pdf HRES 2/28/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 2/28/2018 6:00:00 PM
HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Opposition-Squyres Graphic.pdf HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Opposition-Squyres Testimony.pdf HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB330 ver A 2.16.18.pdf HJUD 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/21/2018 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/23/2018 1:30:00 PM
HJUD 2/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB330 Transmittal Letter 2.16.18.pdf HJUD 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/21/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB330 Fiscal Note DNR-DOG 2.16.18.pdf HJUD 2/16/2018 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/21/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB330 Opposing Document-UCM Letter 2.21.18.pdf HJUD 2/21/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB330 Proposed Amendment 2.23.18.pdf HJUD 2/23/2018 1:30:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB330 Amendments #1-2 2.26.18.pdf HJUD 2/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB330 Amendments #1-2 HJUD Final Vote 2.26.18.pdf HJUD 2/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB 27 Sponsor Statement 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/2/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Ver. D bill 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/2/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Version A 1.18.17.PDF HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Version D Sectional Analysis 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/2/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Fiscal Note DEC 3-2-18 HIGH-RISK CHEMICALS FOR CHILD EXPOSURE 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/2/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 4/4/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Flame Retardents - Consumer Product Safety Commission 9-28-17.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Supporting Document - Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust Analysis 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Supporting Document - Household dust factsheet 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Supporting Document 5 Support Emails 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Supporting Document -20 Support Letters 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 355 Supporting Document - Letter DOF Fire Program Mgt 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 330 Overview Presentation by DNR 3.8.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/12/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/14/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 330
HB 355 Amendment One - D.2 - Rep. Rauscher 3.1.18.pdf HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Amendment Two - D.3 - Rep Rauscher 3.1.18.pdf HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Amendment Three - D.4 - Rep. Rauscher 3.1.18.pdf HRES 3/5/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 355 Amendment Six - Rep. Rauscher 3.7.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 355
HB 27 Flame Retardants Presentation.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Supporting Document - Testimony - Talley 3.9.18.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27
HB 27 Supporting Document - Safer States laws.pdf HRES 3/9/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/19/2018 1:00:00 PM
HRES 3/26/2018 1:00:00 PM
HB 27