Legislature(2015 - 2016)BARNES 124

04/10/2015 01:00 PM House RESOURCES

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ HB 38 AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 38(RES) Out of Committee
-- Invited/Public Testimony --
+ HB 179 FOOD PROGRAM DONATIONS; FISH AND GAME TELECONFERENCED
Scheduled but Not Heard
-- Invited/Public Testimony --
*+ HJR 20 FISH & WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BY STATES TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHJR 20(RES) Out of Committee
-- Invited/Public Testimony --
*+ HJR 24 LIFT FEDERAL LAND WITHDRAWALS TELECONFERENCED
Moved HJR 24 Out of Committee
-- Invited/Public Testimony --
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
          HJR 20-FISH & WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BY STATES                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
1:41:29 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  HAWKER announced that  the next order of  business is                                                               
HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 20,  Urging the United States Congress                                                               
to  enact legislation  to clarify  and recognize  each individual                                                               
state's  authority to  manage the  fish and  wildlife within  its                                                               
borders.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:41:51 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN, sponsor,  introduced  HJR  20, saying  it                                                               
encourages Congress  to pass legislation that  would clarify each                                                               
individual  state's  authority  to   manage  the  fish  and  game                                                               
resources  within  its  boundary.     Alaska  has  a  history  of                                                               
successfully  managing  its fish  and  game  resources and  their                                                               
habitats.  Alaska  has even restored the  depleted fishery stocks                                                               
that were  received from  the federal government  at the  time of                                                               
statehood.  Alaska  has used its resources wisely  calling on the                                                               
different  experiences of  its  people,  from using  professional                                                               
scientists  to the  wisdom of  Native elders  to manage  fish and                                                               
game resources  and the lands  they inhabit.  Doing  so maintains                                                               
yields  for  the  benefit  of  the state's  people,  which  is  a                                                               
requirement of the state's constitution.   However, intrusions by                                                               
the  federal government  have increased  on a  number of  fronts,                                                               
challenging  Alaska's sovereign  authority and  responsibility to                                                               
manage its  fish and game  resources.  Those actions  may forever                                                               
impact the state's ability to  determine both its sovereignty and                                                               
management of resources as promised  in the statehood compact and                                                               
in the Alaska National Interest  Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA).                                                               
The resolution urges Congress to  enact legislation reserving the                                                               
authority  to enforce  state fish  and wildlife  laws and  manage                                                               
fish  and wildlife  on public  land to  the individual  states in                                                               
which the land is found.                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN  added that  the  resolution  grew out  of                                                               
discussions amongst  [legislators].  For  example, Representative                                                               
Johnson  is  an  active  member   of  the  National  Assembly  of                                                               
Sportsmen's  Caucuses,  an organization  of  42  states and  over                                                               
2,500  legislators.   Its  main mission  is  to ensure  continued                                                               
protection  of  the outdoor  heritage  of  hunting, fishing,  and                                                               
trapping,  and  the ability  to  manage  that.   There  has  been                                                               
discussion on how important it is  for the states to manage their                                                               
own  resources.    He  said  he would  like  to  use  this  model                                                               
legislation   to  bring   back  to   the  National   Assembly  of                                                               
Sportsmen's Caucuses in hopes of  getting 30 plus states in order                                                               
to show Congress that locals know what is best for their states.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
1:45:13 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON drew attention to  the clause on page 2,                                                               
lines  7-8,  and  asked  where  the  National  Park  Service  has                                                               
restricted access of state employees to state land and water.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN replied he  believes this is happening more                                                               
recently  on the  Kenai  Peninsula for  hunting  and fishing  and                                                               
intensive management for brown bears.   It is also happening with                                                               
the Unimak Island caribou herd.   The island is half federal land                                                               
and half  state land.   The  people of Cold  Bay depend  on those                                                               
caribou for  survival, but there  are also wolves on  that island                                                               
and it has gotten  to the point where the state  wants to do some                                                               
intensive management to  reduce the number of wolves.   The whole                                                               
herd is  close to being  lost and the  people of Unimak  will not                                                               
have that valuable resource to feed their families.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
VICE  CHAIR HAWKER  recalled  the case  where  the National  Park                                                               
Service  overstepped  its  bounds  on  the  Yukon-Charley  Rivers                                                               
National  Preserve.     Armed  National  Park   Service  officers                                                               
literally commandeered  Alaska citizens who were  utilizing their                                                               
right to progress over state navigable waters.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN  added that  that was  probably one  of the                                                               
most highlighted issues within the state when it happened.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:47:25 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  TARR  noted  that  for  fisheries  there  is  the                                                               
federal Magnuson-Stevens Act and the  councils that have been set                                                               
up through  the Act.  She  inquired whether there is  an existing                                                               
federal wildlife law that is  similar to the Magnuson-Stevens Act                                                               
that would  be amended if Congress  were to take action  as urged                                                               
by HJR 20.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN drew attention to  a paper in the committee                                                               
packet  entitled,  "Wildlife  Management Authority:    The  State                                                               
Agencies'  Perspective," written  by  the Association  of Fish  &                                                               
Wildlife Agencies.  He noted that  the fourth paragraph on page 2                                                               
talks about how  the directors have identified  that the National                                                               
Environmental  Policy Act  of 1969  (NEPA) is  a hindrance.   The                                                               
paper discusses the relationship  between the federal government,                                                               
not  specific  laws, and  the  ability  for  the states  and  the                                                               
federal government to sit down and  talk out these issues.  It is                                                               
not  so much  that  federal  laws are  bad  laws  but rather  the                                                               
ability to work with the  federal government in the management of                                                               
those  laws  in  regard  to  fish  and  wildlife  management  and                                                               
resource development at the same.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE TARR  brought attention to  page 1, lines  4-6, of                                                               
the  resolution  and offered  her  understanding  that the  North                                                               
American Model of Wildlife Conservation  is not something that is                                                               
in federal statute.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN  answered that  the North America  Model of                                                               
Wildlife Conservation was adopted about  78 years ago and is what                                                               
is now  known as  the Pittman-Robertson Act.   The  purchasers of                                                               
outdoor  sporting goods  - hunters  and fishermen  - provide  the                                                               
funding for [state] fish and wildlife departments.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR HAWKER added it is  a federal excise tax of 11 percent                                                               
on all sporting goods, ammunition, and archery supplies.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
1:50:51 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON said he supports  HJR 20 and asked whether                                                               
the sponsor would  be amenable to adding additional  names to the                                                               
resolution's  distribution  list.    For  example,  the  National                                                               
Assembly of  Sportsmen's Caucuses could  be added to the  list as                                                               
well as The  Council of State Governments West.   He posited that                                                               
an official document  coming from the state would  be better than                                                               
him handing out a copy of the resolution.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN   agreed,  further  suggesting   that  the                                                               
National  Conference  of  State   Legislators  would  be  another                                                               
organization that could be added.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:52:22 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE TARR  understood that  the Upper Cook  Inlet Drift                                                               
Association  (UCIDA)  was about  fishing  in  the Kenai  National                                                               
Wildlife  Refuge and  about where  federal  management ended  and                                                               
state management began.  She  further understood that the lawsuit                                                               
asserted it is  the state's right to manage  for anadromous fish.                                                               
She inquired  whether that is an  example of what the  sponsor is                                                               
hoping will come out of the  resolution - that in situations like                                                               
this the default would be that the state manages the resource.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN  offered his belief that  the UCIDA lawsuit                                                               
is  asking for  federal  oversight.   Currently  there is  shared                                                               
management within  Cook Inlet with  the three-mile  boundary that                                                               
the state  has and Cook Inlet  is wider than six  miles at points                                                               
and so  the federal government has  said the state has  the right                                                               
to manage that  on both sides.  He said  he therefore thinks that                                                               
lawsuit  is a  separate  issue.   However,  earlier  this year  a                                                               
federal  action was  taken in  regard to  nets on  the Kenai  and                                                               
perhaps,  he  suggested,  this is  what  Representative  Tarr  is                                                               
referring  to.   Nets  catch  everything and  could  have a  very                                                               
detrimental effect  on the world  class fisheries there,  as well                                                               
as the  non-targeted species  in the river.   State  managers are                                                               
there  to closely  watch  that  every day  and  their ability  to                                                               
manage  that  fishery  is  much  better  than  federal  managers.                                                               
Responding  further to  Representative Tarr,  he said  this is  a                                                               
very good example of something that has happened recently.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:55:24 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  HERRON   inquired  whether  the  U.S.   Fish  and                                                               
Wildlife  Service is  a supporter  of,  or signer  on, the  North                                                               
American Model  of Wildlife Conservation  or whether  the service                                                               
considers that foreign to its mission.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN  offered  his   belief  that  the  federal                                                               
government  is very  supportive of  the North  American Model  of                                                               
Wildlife Conservation; it was federal law that enacted it.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON  concluded that what is  being said between                                                               
the lines  of the resolution is  that the U.S. Fish  and Wildlife                                                               
Service is  not following  the North  American Model  of Wildlife                                                               
Conservation.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN  answered he  suspects that in  essence the                                                               
North American Model of Wildlife  Conservation has to do with the                                                               
federal  excise tax  and passing  that over  to the  states.   He                                                               
reported  that last  year there  were  conversations between  the                                                               
federal government  and the Texas  Parks and  Wildlife Commission                                                               
that the federal  government may take over the funds  that now go                                                               
to states  through Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson  to fund                                                               
fish and  wildlife agencies  at the federal  level as  opposed to                                                               
bringing those funds  over to the states.  That,  he added, would                                                               
be opposing the objective of that model.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  HERRON remarked  that  Congress  has a  difficult                                                               
time passing  and enforcing  laws and  so bureaucrats  make their                                                               
own rules.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
1:57:19 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON  offered his hope that  federal subsistence                                                               
management not be  mixed into this, saying that is  what is being                                                               
done when  talking about the nets  on the Kenai River,  which was                                                               
the  federal subsistence  board.   Mixing  this with  subsistence                                                               
would divide Alaskans rather than unite them, he warned.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN  replied that  in no way  does HJR  20 have                                                               
any implications to subsistence within  Alaska.  Rather, it helps                                                               
clarify   the  discussions   and  allow   the  state's   wildlife                                                               
biologists,  citizens, and  Native  leaders to  assist by  having                                                               
those discussions before decisions are  made on the management of                                                               
fish and wildlife, whether it is federal or state management.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  HAWKER thanked Representative Neuman  for making this                                                               
clear on the record.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE OLSON said the resolution has a nice title.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE NEUMAN thanked Representative Olson.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:00:01 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR HAWKER opened public  testimony on HJR 20, then closed                                                               
it after ascertaining that no one wished to testify.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
2:01:05 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON  moved to adopt Conceptual  Amendment 1 to                                                               
add on  page 3,  line 9:   the  National Assembly  of Sportsmen's                                                               
Caucuses, The Council of State  Governments, The Council of State                                                               
Governments  West,   and  the  National  [Conference]   of  State                                                               
[Legislatures].                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR  HAWKER objected for discussion  purposes and inquired                                                               
whether  the  conceptual  amendment applies  to  the  appropriate                                                               
division or committee of those entities.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   JOHNSON  responded   he  thinks   that  if   the                                                               
resolution  is sent  to  the  organizations it  will  get to  the                                                               
appropriate place within each entity.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR HAWKER  noted that these additional  entities would be                                                               
added  under the  section of  the resolution  pertaining to  whom                                                               
copies of the resolution shall be sent.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  NEUMAN  thanked  Representative Johnson  for  the                                                               
conceptual amendment,  saying it would  be sent to  the presiding                                                               
officers  of the  entities, of  which  Representative Johnson  is                                                               
one.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
2:02:45 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
VICE CHAIR HAWKER removed his  objection.  There being no further                                                               
objection, Conceptual Amendment 1 was adopted.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:03:07 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON  stated he  doesn't believe he  has ever                                                               
seen a  resolution he disagrees  with more and he  believes there                                                               
are hundreds  of thousands  of Alaskans  who would  also disagree                                                               
with it if it  was put before them.  He said  he couldn't be more                                                               
pleased that the  federal lands in Alaska are  managed by federal                                                               
officials who are managing the land  the way they are supposed to                                                               
for  protecting  subsistence rights,  protecting  non-consumptive                                                               
rights, and protecting  the mission of the federal law.   He said                                                               
he has spent  a lot of time studying, writing,  and testifying on                                                               
this issue.  The idea that the state  gets to manage all of it is                                                               
wrong and has to be wrong  because everyone knows that within the                                                               
national parks,  not the  preserves, he  has seen  people stopped                                                               
from removing a  bone off the road, which is  consistent with the                                                               
fact that  everyone knows  hunting is not  allowed in  a national                                                               
park.   It is the  federal government that  says that.   The idea                                                               
that there  is a universal  rule that in  all parts of  the state                                                               
the  state  alone manages  wildlife  is  incorrect factually  and                                                               
legally.  Then the question  becomes, Where can the state manage?                                                               
He said he  has spoken before the visitor industry  and he thinks                                                               
that,  quietly, the  visitor industry  shares  his concern  about                                                               
Alaska's   practices.     This   came  up   in  the   committee's                                                               
confirmation hearing  with Ms. Sager  Albaugh who  basically said                                                               
if  a  person wants  to  walk  a dog  on  a  trail on  the  Kenai                                                               
Peninsula it  is that  person's problem if  he/she wants  to walk                                                               
the dog off  leash.  In other words, Ms.  Sager Albaugh's view as                                                               
a Board of Game member is  that the Board will control everything                                                               
adjacent to that trail and phooey  on the dog walker; that is the                                                               
policy of  the State of  Alaska.  He said  he could sit  back and                                                               
say, "Geez, I  can't stop this."  But when  these times happen he                                                               
thinks  he is  morally  obligated  to say  "wait  a minute"  even                                                               
though it  shines a light on  him that he doesn't  want, although                                                               
it  may  be  better than  an  artificial  light  in  a den.    He                                                               
maintained that the be-it-resolved clause  that says the state is                                                               
supposed to  control federal land  and federal reserve  waters is                                                               
wrong; that was the Katie John  decision where the court said the                                                             
state could lose  that if the state doesn't do  it properly.  The                                                               
resolution maligns  natural diversity,  he said, but  the state's                                                               
viewing industry wants natural diversity  and it's a $2 billion a                                                               
year  industry.   Tourists don't  want to  take a  yellow bus  80                                                               
miles  to Wonder  Lake  and watch  things  getting blasted  away.                                                               
Fundamentally,  he   asks  whether  this  can   be  explained  to                                                               
elementary kids and  tourists.  The answer is no.   Regarding the                                                               
whereas  clause  on page  1  about  the Kenai  National  Wildlife                                                               
Refuge,  he said  he testified  in that  hearing and  the federal                                                               
biologist proved, and the state  biologist Mr. Vincent Lang could                                                               
not contend  with those  arguments, that the  brown bears  on the                                                               
Kenai  Peninsula  are   threatened.    The  idea   that  that  is                                                               
conservation based,  that the state's  threatening them  when the                                                               
U.S.  Fish and  Wildlife  Service says  it  is unsustainable  and                                                               
isn't going to  allow any more hunting on federal  land, the land                                                               
of the  American people ...   The  idea that there  is increasing                                                               
inconsistency -  of course  there is  because they  are different                                                               
conservation  system  units  with different  rules  depending  on                                                               
whether it is the Bureau of  Land Management or the National Park                                                               
Service.  Regarding the Unimak  caribou herd, he pointed out that                                                               
that intensive  game management was  supported by him  and groups                                                               
he worked  with and it  went forward to  stop the demise  of that                                                               
herd, which was years ago  and therefore not a recent phenomenon.                                                               
So he looks at  some of this and asks, "Wow, are  we going to use                                                               
this  kind of  management  in Yellowstone?"    Regarding the  hot                                                               
button subject about the armed  officers, he said he doesn't know                                                               
what happened  there but guesses someone  does.  [The U.S.]  is a                                                               
very  armed  society,  he  said,  and  he  would  expect  federal                                                               
officers  to occasionally  carry a  sidearm because  they are  at                                                               
great risk  if they don't.   The state is out  of compliance with                                                               
ANILCA, which is federal law.   It is the Indian Commerce Clause,                                                               
it is [the nation's] founding  fathers, 1789, which way pre-dates                                                               
the Alaska Statehood Act.  Testimony  was heard last year in this                                                               
committee  about how  the big  game concessions  on federal  land                                                               
work  better than  the state's  system.   Big game  guide hunters                                                               
testified that the  federal system was a better system.   He said                                                               
he  understands  where  HJR  20  is  coming  from,  but  couldn't                                                               
disagree more with it.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:09:55 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON  moved to report  HJR 20, as  amended, out                                                               
of  committee with  individual  recommendations and  accompanying                                                               
zero fiscal  note.  There  being no objection, CSHJR  20(RES) was                                                               
reported from the House Resources Standing Committee.                                                                           

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
CSHB 38 Draft Proposed Blank CS ver H.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
CSHB 38 Sectional Analysis, ver H.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
CSHB 38 Summary of Changes ver A to ver H.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Aquatic Invasives House Resources presentation.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Supporting Documents-Article US Forest Svc 1-27-2011.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Fiscal Note-DEC-EH-4-3-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Fiscal Note-DEC-WQ-4-3-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Sponsor Statement, ver H.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Supporting Documents-Article KCAW Sika Local News 12-23-13.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Supporting Documents-Louie Flora LOS 3.26.15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Supporting Documents-MOU DNR and F&G 1-15-13.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 ver A.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB 38 Supporting Documents-multiple LOS.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB179 Sectional Analysis ver E.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Summary of Changes ver A to ver E.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 ver A.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Sectional Analysis ver A.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Supporting Documents-ADN Article Looking for New Ways to Promote Old Foods 09 27 2014.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Supporting Documents-ADN Article Store Outside Your Door 03 28 2014.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Supporting Documents-Dept of Law Opinion.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Sponsor Statement.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Fiscal Note-DEC-EH-4-3-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Fiscal Note-DFG-Admin-4-3-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HJR24 ver A.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR 24 Sponsor statement.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR24 Fiscal Note-LEG-SESS-04-09-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR 24 Supporting Documents-US Dept of Interior-BLM Cover sheet-June 2006.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR 24 Supporting Documents-US Dept of Interior-BLM chapter_1-June 2006.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR 24 Supporting Documents-US Dept of Interior-BLM chapter_2-June 2006.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR24 Supporting Documents-US Dept of Interior-BLM chapter_3-June 2006.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR24 Supporting Documents-US Dept of Interior-BLM chapter_4-June 2006.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR24 Supporting Documents-US Dept of Interior-BLM map.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR24 Supporting Documents-DNR Land sheet-March 2000.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR20 ver A.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HJR20-LEG-SESS-04-02-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB179 Draft Proposed Blank CS ver I.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Sectional Analysis ver N.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Sponsor Statement ver N.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Summary of Changes ver A to ver N.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
CSHB 179(FSH) ver N.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Sectional Analysis ver I.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB179 Opposing Documents-Doug Rhodes-4-10-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB38 Supporting Documents-Fax Tim Stallard-4-10-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB38 Supporting Documents-Fax-Matthew Steffy-4-8-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB179-Supporting Document-email-Mary Wood-4-10-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 179
HB38 Fiscal Note-DNR-Agr-4-6-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38
HB38 Fiscal Note-DFG-SF-4-11-15.pdf HRES 4/10/2015 1:00:00 PM
HB 38