Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/10/2023 03:15 PM House LABOR & COMMERCE
Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB85 | |
HB87 | |
HB35 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | HB 87 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 35 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 85 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 35-REPEAL CERTIFICATE OF NEED PROGRAM 3:42:18 PM CHAIR SUMNER announced that the final order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 35, "An Act relating to the certificate of need program for health care facilities; and providing for an effective date." 3:42:37 PM The committee took an at-ease from 3:42 p.m. to 3:46 p.m. 3:46:32 PM REPRESENTATIVE GEORGE RAUSCHER, Alaska State Legislature, as prime sponsor, introduced HB 35. He stated that HB 35 would repeal the certificate of need program and provide an effective date of July 1, 2024. He explained that the certificate of need program was first mandated by the federal government in 1974, and later repealed federally in 1987. He said that since 1987, 13 states have already repealed certificate of need programs. He stated that this program was intended to lower healthcare costs; however, healthcare costs have changed from a fee per service system to a prospective payment system, and this has caused healthcare costs to increase because of a lack of competition. 3:48:49 PM CRAIG VALDEZ, Staff, Representative George Rauscher, Alaska State Legislature, gave the sectional analysis for HB 35, on behalf of Representative Rauscher, prime sponsor. He stated that Sections 1 through 7 would make modifications to definitions of healthcare terms under current state statutes. Sections 8 and 9 would repeal the certificate of need program, and Section 10 would prevent the Department of Family and Community Services from acting on or after the effective date to modify or revoke any certificate of need. He said that Section 11 would provide for an effective date of July 1, 2024. He added that the proposed bill currently has a zero fiscal note. 3:51:47 PM REPRESENTATIVE PRAX asked whether repealing the certificate of need program would cost significant amounts of money regarding Medicare. REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER answered that he has not consulted the Department of Health, but he expressed the belief that it would. He added that the certificate of need program only adds to the costs and complications of remote communities trying to build new healthcare facilities. 3:54:24 PM REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked whether it would be more accurate to say that the fiscal note is "indeterminant." MR. VALDEZ answered that this would be correct for indirect costs. REPRESENTATIVE RUFFRIDGE asked how other issues, such as the inability to raise revenue via property taxes in certain areas, would be addressed in regard to funding the construction of hospitals. REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER expressed agreement that there are multiple hurdles to building a hospital in rural areas; however, he expressed the belief that the certificate of need is a "needless hurdle" which takes money away from the actual funds to build these facilities. 3:57:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK asked if the $1.5 million figure is the start-up cost for requiring a certificate of need. MR. VALDEZ answered that if the cost of the facility were equal to or greater than $1.5 million, a certificate of need would be required. In response to a follow-up question, he said that he is unsure of the exact figure for any additional costs being incurred in relation to the certificate of need requirement. REPRESENTATIVE CARRICK asked whether any healthcare facilities support the repeal of the certificate of need program. REPRESENTATIVE RAUSCHER answered that he has spoken to a few healthcare clinics that are supportive of the repeal. 4:01:01 PM JAIMIE CAVANAUGH, Attorney, Institute for Justice, stated that the Institute for Justice has been working on legislation and litigation to end certificate of need laws for decades. She said that certain aspects of these laws were suspended during the pandemic, and this had pointed out that they are ineffective. She stated that Tennessee, Alabama, Oregon, and Washington have certificate of need laws which do not apply to rural areas, but these laws are not effective at preventing the closure of rural healthcare facilities, while Utah and Colorado are states without certificate of need laws, and these states have not had a rural hospital closure since 2005. She said that the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice have been involved in efforts to repeal certificate of need laws. She argued that this is because of the negative effect on healthcare competition. She suggested that the concentration of healthcare facilities in a single area leads to higher costs and lower quality. 4:06:55 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked if there were any examples of certificate of need laws affecting Alaska differently than other states. MS. CAVANAUGH answered that the data shows states without certificate of need laws have greater access to healthcare and an increased number of healthcare facilities. She acknowledged that repealing the law would not address Alaska's geographical spread. She added that many individuals seeking to start a new healthcare facility give up before starting because it is known that other healthcare facilities have the ability to argue against the need for a new facility during the certificate of need process. 4:10:12 PM CHAIR SUMNER announced that HB 35 was held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 35 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 35 |
HB 35 Fiscal Note Dep of Hlth Medicaid Svcs.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 35 |
HB0035A.PDF |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 35 |
HB 35 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 35 |
HB 87 Sectional Analysis 2.24.2023.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 87 |
HB 87 DOR Fiscal Note 2.27.2023.PDF |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 87 |
HB 87 version A.PDF |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 87 |
HB087 Presentation to H.L&C 03.10.23.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 87 |
HB 87 Transmittal Letter 2.23.2023.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 87 |
Support for AK SB 83 HB 85_2023_Archbridge Institute.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 85 SB 83 |
HB87 Support Letter HLC 4.3.2023.pdf |
HL&C 3/10/2023 3:15:00 PM |
HB 87 |