Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124

04/14/2014 03:15 PM LABOR & COMMERCE


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ SB 99 AIDEA: DEVELOPMENT LOANS TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+ SB 140 AIDEA: ARCTIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM/FUND TELECONFERENCED
Moved Out of Committee
+ SB 194 TOURISM MARKETING BOARD TELECONFERENCED
Moved HCS CSSB 194(L&C) Out of Committee
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
         SB 140-AIDEA: ARCTIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM/FUND                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:01:15 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR OLSON  announced that the  next order of business  would be                                                               
CS  FOR SENATE  BILL NO.  140(FIN), "An  Act creating  the Arctic                                                               
infrastructure  development  program  and   fund  in  the  Alaska                                                               
Industrial  Development and  Export  Authority;  and relating  to                                                               
dividends  from  the  Alaska Industrial  Development  and  Export                                                               
Authority."                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:01:20 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
JESSE  LOGAN,   Staff,  Senator   Lesil  McGuire,   Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, stated that  SB 140 represents one  of the principal                                                               
elements  of the  Alaska Arctic  Policy Commission's  legislative                                                               
packet.   The AAPC was created  by the legislature to  prepare an                                                               
Arctic policy  and implementation plan  for Alaska and  to return                                                               
the plan  to the  full body  for consideration.   The  purpose of                                                               
this   bill   would   be  to   attract   investment   in   Arctic                                                               
infrastructure  to pair  with  private  investment from  Alaska's                                                               
AIDEA.   Although  AIDEA  has  the authority  to  invest in  many                                                               
areas, it  does not  have a specific  program to  attract private                                                               
investment for infrastructure.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR OLSON reported  that the House Labor  and Commerce Standing                                                               
Committee heard  the companion bill, HB  288, but SB 140  will be                                                               
the vehicle.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:02:28 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR.  LOGAN provided  a section-by-section  analysis of  the bill.                                                               
Section 1 would  establish AIDEA's ability to adopt  a policy for                                                               
payment  of  a  dividend.    He  characterized  Sections  1-3  as                                                               
"boilerplate"  provisions that  would  establish definitions  for                                                               
"net   income"  and   "unrestricted  net   income"  as   well  as                                                               
establishing a  means for this  fund to return dividends  back to                                                               
the general fund.  Sections  4-8 would make conforming changes to                                                               
include  loans from  the Arctic  Infrastructure Development  Fund                                                               
(AIDF) regarding interest rates  and other requirements for loans                                                               
from funds  managed by AIDEA, such  as the SETS fund.   Section 9                                                               
would add the  AIDF to the types of programs  to pay borrowers of                                                               
loan participation that the authority  can establish.  Section 10                                                               
would  establish the  Arctic  Infrastructure Development  Program                                                               
fund to  promote and provide financing  for Arctic infrastructure                                                               
development.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:03:27 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN  referred to page  6 lines  2-16, which lists  what the                                                               
fund  consists of,  including direct  appropriation  made by  the                                                               
legislature, money  or assets transferred  to the fund  by AIDEA,                                                               
unrestricted loan repayments, interest,  and other income earned.                                                               
It would  also make  certain that this  account is  separate from                                                               
other accounts and accounts can  be established within this fund.                                                               
He referred to  page 6, lines 17-19, which clarify  that the fund                                                               
will be used for Arctic  infrastructure development.  He referred                                                               
to  page  6, lines  20  through  page  7,  line 21,  which  would                                                               
establish the  powers and duties  of the authority  regarding the                                                               
AIDF.   This section would  mirror the  powers and duties  of the                                                               
SETS fund.   It  would allow  AIDEA to use  this fund  for Arctic                                                               
infrastructure    development,   insure    project   obligations,                                                               
guarantee loans  or bonds, establish  reserves, and  acquire real                                                               
or personal property  by purchase, transfer, or  foreclosure.  It                                                               
would also  defer principal payments  on capitalized  interest on                                                               
Arctic  infrastructure  development, as  well  as  to enter  into                                                               
lease  agreements,  sales-lease-back  agreements,  build-operate-                                                               
transfer  and operate-transfer  agreements  or similar  financing                                                               
agreements.  It  would also allow AIDEA to  enter into agreements                                                               
with  government  entities  for   the  transfer  and  control  of                                                               
infrastructure facilities, rights-of-way, and  studies.  It would                                                               
allow  for services  to be  contracted  and bonds  to be  issued.                                                               
This section would also allow  for loan guarantees to be provided                                                               
for  purchase   and  repair  of  vessels   in  federally  managed                                                               
fisheries  or  purchase of  quota  shares  or individual  fishing                                                               
quota  used in  federally managed  fisheries in  the Arctic.   He                                                               
said the  loan guarantees would be  $7 million and the  cap would                                                               
be no more than one-third of the capital cost of the projects.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:04:56 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN referred  to page 7, line  22 to page 8,  line 2, which                                                               
would establish  limitations on the financing  for infrastructure                                                               
development.  It would consist of loans for not more than one-                                                                  
third of the  capital cost of the development,  limiting the loan                                                               
guarantee  to  not exceed  $20  million.    It would  also  allow                                                               
financing for up  to 40 years and establish that  the fund can be                                                               
used as  security for a bond  guarantee.  He referred  to page 8,                                                               
lines  2-19,  Section  11,  which   defines  the  "Arctic"  in  a                                                               
geographical  boundary and  page 8,  lines 7-19,  defines "Arctic                                                               
infrastructure development."                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:05:39 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON asked what  exactly is being envisioned.                                                               
He has seen  the map that extends to Kamchatka  and the Mackenzie                                                               
River.   He asked for an  example of projects would  be developed                                                               
with these loans.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN  answered that  he couldn't give  any examples  but the                                                               
purpose is  to attract  projects from  private investment  in the                                                               
state or outside the state.   For example, one project could be a                                                               
deep water draft  port the United States Army  Corps of Engineers                                                               
(USACE) has currently  been working on.  Several  sites have been                                                               
identified, with Port Clarence often  discussed.  This fund would                                                               
allow the  U.S. Department of  Defense or the U.S.  Department of                                                               
the Interior to partner with the  state on financing options.  He                                                               
recalled that this has previously  happened to establish the U.S.                                                               
Coast  Guard's  permanent presence  in  Anchorage.   Using  AIDEA                                                               
saved the  U.S. Coast  Guard considerable money  and was  part of                                                               
their decision-making, he said.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
4:07:11 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  JOSEPHSON  recalled  SB 99  would  give  specific                                                               
authority  to issue  new  bonds in  substantial  amounts, but  he                                                               
asked whether projects would compete  with other projects for the                                                               
$67 million corpus of the fund under this bill.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN answered  that this fund would not be  capitalized.  He                                                               
explained  that under  SB  99,  the issuance  of  bonds would  be                                                               
outside the  SETS fund,  and would fall  under the  general AIDEA                                                               
authority.   This bill  would allow  the fund  to be  created and                                                               
allow other assets that AIDEA  controls to be transferred to this                                                               
fund if the board of directors  deemed it.  Additionally it could                                                               
be used in the future as a repository for earmarked projects.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:08:01 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE JOSEPHSON  recalled an earlier question  asked how                                                               
all of these  things can be done  if the other body  plans to use                                                               
some  of the  SETS  funds to  pay  for the  power  plant for  the                                                               
University  of  Alaska  Fairbanks  (UAF).     He  asked  for  the                                                               
viability  of   this  or   if  it  would   rely  on   a  separate                                                               
appropriation at a later date.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR.  LOGAN   answered  that  this   would  rely  on   a  separate                                                               
appropriation or a transfer from other funds within AIDEA.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR OLSON  suggested that this one  is lagging about a  year or                                                               
two behind the other bill.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
4:08:48 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER referred to page  8 lines 16-18, and asked                                                               
what  is envisioned  in terms  of the  construction, improvement,                                                               
rehabilitation, or expansion of  a shore-based plant, facility or                                                               
equipment  used in  support  of  a fishery  in  the  Arctic.   He                                                               
suggested the  language is  fairly broad.   He asked  how closely                                                               
affiliated the project  would need to be to  Arctic fisheries for                                                               
it to qualify.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN answered  it may be that  a dock needed to  be built to                                                               
house  vessels  that  fish  primarily  in  the  federally-managed                                                               
fisheries.  He  said it might not  be located in the  Arctic.  He                                                               
offered his  belief that these  provisions are designed  to allow                                                               
projects in  the state  to be  eligible for  these funds  if they                                                               
support development in the Arctic.                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
4:09:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  SADDLER said,  "There  was  discussion about  the                                                               
community development quota corporation  that home ports outside,                                                               
and they  could use  a port  in Seward if  we're available."   He                                                               
asked whether this bill is aimed at that.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN answered that the  fisheries provisions in the bill are                                                               
designed  to  repatriate some  of  the  vessels and  quotas  that                                                               
currently reside outside Alaska.   He emphasized that there isn't                                                               
any specific  mention of eligibility  of any specific  group, but                                                               
AIDEA has  authority to operate  only in  Alaska, so if  a vessel                                                               
wanted to participate, it would need to relocate to Alaska.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:10:32 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER  pointed out he  did not see  any specific                                                               
restriction limiting it to Alaska-based businesses.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR OLSON clarified  that projects were eligible  if engaged in                                                               
business in Alaska.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
4:10:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD  asked who the responsible  agency within                                                               
the federal area would be if  a conflict arose between mining and                                                               
fishing.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN asked for further clarification on the question.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE REINBOLD asked who would  be the governing body to                                                               
resolve any disputes if multiple resources were in the area.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. LOGAN answered  it would be the same  agencies that currently                                                               
resolve those  disputes.  In  further response to a  question, he                                                               
said  he  didn't know,  possibly  the  National Marine  Fisheries                                                               
Service, Alaska  Department of  Fish & Game,  or any  agency that                                                               
resolves disputes in federal and state managed fishery areas.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON said that Mr. Logan has done a good job.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:12:30 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  CHENAULT  recalled  comments about  the  City  of                                                               
Seward.  He  explained that Seward is also a  major marine repair                                                               
terminal so it is possible some  ships could be in port that have                                                               
been involved  in oil  exploration in the  Arctic.   He suggested                                                               
this could be why this bill could affect Seward.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
TED LEONARD, Executive Director,  Alaska Industrial Development &                                                               
Export Authority  (AIDEA), Department  of Commerce,  Community, &                                                               
Economic Development, deferred to Mark Davis.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:14:04 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MARK DAVIS,  Deputy Director,  Alaska Industrial  Development and                                                               
Export Authority,  Department of Commerce, Community,  & Economic                                                               
Development, stated that funding would  work within Alaska as per                                                               
AIDEA's statutes.   He anticipated that would  be further refined                                                               
by  regulation.    Secondly,  with respect  to  the  funding,  he                                                               
pointed  out  that the  AIDF  is  an  unfunded fund,  unlike  the                                                               
current SETS fund that is funded.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
4:14:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR OLSON asked whether he  anticipated that it would be funded                                                               
in the future.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR. DAVIS said  that the funding would be in  a manner similar to                                                               
the Interior Energy Project and  anticipated that the legislature                                                               
would focus  on a  specific port  project and  it would  use this                                                               
AIDF as  a vehicle to provide  AIDEA with some of  the funding if                                                               
it was using a public-private partnership funding mechanism.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:15:22 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
RON LONG, Deputy  City Manager, City of Seward,  stated a variety                                                               
of  industries would  be  in support  of  development within  the                                                               
Arctic, including the  oil and gas industry  port development, in                                                               
which  the  city would  provide  a  staging  area for  goods  and                                                               
services that  need to do business  in the Arctic but  must stage                                                               
outside the  strictest geographic definition as  developed by the                                                               
Alaska Arctic  Policy Council.   He  emphasized that  this should                                                               
take place  in Alaska, and  the City of  Seward would want  to be                                                               
competitive with other  ports in Alaska.  He said  that the state                                                               
will   want  to   tilt  the   development  towards   Alaska  from                                                               
development  currently being  staged  outside Alaska.   He  noted                                                               
that the Alaska Arctic Policy  Council has identified a number of                                                               
needs and  opportunities as well  as significant  private capital                                                               
ready  to support  the development  effort, which  the state  and                                                               
municipalities want to attract to Alaska.   He compared it to how                                                               
other  states attract  Nike and  Boeing  corporate industries  to                                                               
their states.   He identified the fisheries as  ones conducted in                                                               
the  Bering  Sea,  which are  large  offshore  federally  managed                                                               
fisheries  that are  not against  the coast  or in  conflict with                                                               
state-managed fisheries.   He acknowledged that not  any one port                                                               
could do  everything to  support development in  the Arctic.   He                                                               
stressed that  response agencies must  be close to the  area, but                                                               
moving goods and services might be  located at Dutch Harbor or in                                                               
Kodiak.   He offered his  belief that  Seward is the  right place                                                               
for operations that need rail and road access.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:18:09 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  SADDLER asked  how he  envisioned this  financing                                                               
tool being used in his community.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR.  LONG suggested  that  the  public-private partnerships  have                                                               
worked successfully at Red Dog and  the North Slope.  In terms of                                                               
fisheries,  such as  the Bering  Sea fleet,  the CDQ  groups have                                                               
allocated  10  percent  of  the  resource  to  Alaskans  and  the                                                               
remaining  90 percent  is largely  being capitalized  outside the                                                               
state.   He  suggested  that the  state could  create  a new,  or                                                               
augment an  existing, fisheries processing  plant.   He commented                                                               
that if  the shoulder seasons could  be expanded to bring  in new                                                               
product by  leveraging state guarantees on  private capital loans                                                               
using this  program, it  makes that process  more viable  for the                                                               
offshore fisheries and for the  state fisheries it also supports.                                                               
He  suggested that  in port  development, piles,  dock materials,                                                               
staging  and  logistics, and  assembly  for  construction in  the                                                               
Arctic could  be done.   He offered his  belief that the  City of                                                               
Seward  can  be  competitive  for  these  projects  through  this                                                               
program  and private  capital.   He  envisioned  that the  pieces                                                               
could be assembled in Seward and barged when needed.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
4:20:07 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  SADDLER   asked  whether   he  would   have  some                                                               
advantage over other food processing  plants due to the proximity                                                               
to  the  ocean.   He  asked  whether  there  is anything  a  port                                                               
facility  would offer  that other  Cook Inlet  or Gulf  of Alaska                                                               
fisheries could not  access.  He further asked if  there would be                                                               
any limitations on it.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. LONG  answered no.  He  related that as Mr.  Davis suggested,                                                               
it would be done through AIDEA's  due diligence process.  He said                                                               
that each proposal  would need to be a good  business case and he                                                               
anticipated  that AIDEA  would  be doing  its  due diligence  and                                                               
measuring the financial  aspects to ensure that it is  a good and                                                               
viable project before "they sign on the bottom line."                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
4:20:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
SARA  LUKIN,  Chief Operating  Officer,  Pt  Public Policy,  LLC,                                                               
stated  briefly Pt  Public Policy's  support  of this  bill as  a                                                               
whole,  and,  more  specifically, for  the  fisheries  provision.                                                               
Speaking   as   the  only   private   equity   firm  in   Alaska,                                                               
headquartered in  Anchorage, and focused exclusively  on building                                                               
private equity and investment in  Arctic Alaska, she said that Pt                                                               
is supportive of the bill  and the company is "hugely" supportive                                                               
of the fisheries  provision.  In response to a  comment, she said                                                               
that Pt Public Policy has worked  in partnership with the City of                                                               
Seward,  the  Association  of  Village  Council  Presidents,  and                                                               
[Aleutian  Pribilof  Island  Community  Development  Association)                                                               
(APICDA) with  the fisheries portion  of this bill.   In response                                                               
to  a  question,  she  clarified  that  APICDA  is  the  Aleutian                                                               
Pribilof  Island Community  Development Association,  which is  a                                                               
community development quota (CDQ) group.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
4:22:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  SADDLER asked  whether  APICDA would  be the  CDQ                                                               
organization  that  would  envision  taking  advantage  of  these                                                               
opportunities to "plus up" the facilities in Seward.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MS. LUKIN answered  that the organization doesn't  have a project                                                               
in mind, but  if she would envision a project  for this committee                                                               
she would  suggest it might  be a  partnership between AVPC  as a                                                               
majority  owner and  APICDA as  a  minority owner,  using a  loan                                                               
guarantee  from AIDEA  to  purchase vessels  and  quota that  are                                                               
currently  housed in  Washington  State.   The partnership  would                                                               
bring the quota and vessels  back to Alaska, specifically to fish                                                               
the Bering  Sea fishery.   They  would be  required to  house the                                                               
boats in a port in Alaska, perhaps in Seward.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
4:24:01 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  HERRON  commented that  Pt  Public  Policy is  an                                                               
important partner for  a lot of western and  northern Alaska, but                                                               
the issue  is that when the  Arctic opens up, a  lot of resources                                                               
will need  to be developed.   He  envisioned that these  would be                                                               
world class projects,  not just "mom and pop"  organizations.  He                                                               
emphasized the importance of  sustainable communities and offered                                                               
his  belief that  Seward can  help  the Arctic  by having  fleets                                                               
stationed there,  as well as  in Unalaska and some  smaller ports                                                               
in the Bering Sea.   He said it is not  just about development of                                                               
fisheries, but  to have the  ability to respond to  accidents and                                                               
to  provide  a safe  refuge  for  vessels operating  in  Alaska's                                                               
waters.  The  communities of Unalaska and Seward  are examples of                                                               
established ports that will expand due to Arctic development.                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR OLSON remarked that Seward has  also been a railhead and an                                                               
export  facility  for  coal.    He suggested  that  it  could  be                                                               
activated again pretty easily.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
4:25:36 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  OLSON,  after first  determining  no  one else  wished  to                                                               
testify, closed public testimony on SB 140.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  SADDLER  asked  whether  the  sponsor  considered                                                               
placing limitations on where funds  could be used.  He understood                                                               
this bill relates to things that  will service the Arctic but not                                                               
be  located in  the Arctic.   He  asked whether  the sponsor  has                                                               
considered any geographical limitation  on where facilities would                                                               
need to be built.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
MR.  LOGAN referred  to  page  8, lines  4-7,  that describe  the                                                               
geographical boundary of  the Arctic.  He pointed  out that other                                                               
provisions that will  allow Seward to provide  support for Arctic                                                               
development.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
4:26:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER read the definition, in part, which read:                                                                
                                                                                                                                
(19) "Arctic infrastructure development" means                                                                                  
     (A) the construction, improvement, rehabilitation, or                                                                      
     expansion of a facility                                                                                                    
          (i) in the Arctic to aid in development or meet                                                                       
     emergency response needs; or                                                                                               
       (ii)   in   the   state   if   the   construction,                                                                       
     improvement,                                                                                                               
     rehabilitation, or expansion supports or furthers the                                                                      
     development of a facility in the Arctic; or                                                                                
     (B)    the    purchase,   construction,    improvement,                                                                    
     rehabilitation,  or expansion  of a  shore-based plant,                                                                    
     facility,  equipment, or  assets used  in support  of a                                                                    
     fishery in the Arctic.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
4:27:04 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER  asked where financing for  quota share or                                                               
vessel purchasing  envisioned in this  bill fit in  the financial                                                               
opportunities  of fishing  loans,  boat loans,  and  quotas.   He                                                               
asked whether this  was the only financing or  if other financing                                                               
was available.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR.  LOGAN prefaced  his  response  noting he  is  not expert  on                                                               
fisheries financing, but  the floor of $7 million and  the cap of                                                               
one-third was  specifically designed  to not conflict  with other                                                               
state or  federal programs that provide  financing for fisheries.                                                               
He  referred to  page  7,  lines 8-15,  which  provides for  loan                                                               
guarantee only, but does not provide any direct loans.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
4:28:08 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  REINBOLD moved  to  report CSSB  140(FIN) out  of                                                               
committee  with individual  recommendations and  the accompanying                                                               
fiscal notes.   There being  no objection, the CSSB  140(FIN) was                                                               
reported from the House Labor and Commerce Standing Committee.                                                                  

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
SB99 ver P.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Sponsor Statement.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Sectional Analysis ver P.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Fiscal Note-DCCED-AIDEA-02-14-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Summary of Changes ver A to ver P.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Marble Construction 4-03-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Austin Powder West LLC 4-04-2014.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Southeast Stevedoring Corporation 2-02-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Resolution 142546 City of Ketchikan.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Greater Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce 3-31-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Amak Towing Co 4-02-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Tyler Rental 4-02-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB99 Supporting Documents-Letter Alaska Miners Association 4-04-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 99
SB140 ver E.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Sponsor Statement.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Sectional Analysis.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Fiscal Note-DCCED-AIDEA-02-14-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Summary of Changes ver U to ver E.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Letter North Slope Borough 3-19-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Letter NANA 2-27-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Letter PT Public Policy 3-20-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Letter City of Seward 2-26-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Letter Trimble Strategies.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-ARPA Polar map.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Planning and Infrastructure Section of AAPC Preliminary Report.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB140 Supporting Documents-Letter AVCP 3-18-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 140
SB194 ver Y.PDF HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Sponsor Statement.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Fiscal Note-DCCED-DED-04-03-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Fiscal Note-LEG-COU-3-26-14.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Fiscal Note-DCCED-DED-3-24-14.PDF HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Summary of Changes ver A to ver Y.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Draft Proposed Blank CS ver R.PDF HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Supporting Documents-Visit Anchorage Resolution.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194
SB194 Supporting Documents-Letter AkHLA 3-31-2014.pdf HL&C 4/14/2014 3:15:00 PM
SB 194