Legislature(2019 - 2020)GRUENBERG 120

02/10/2020 01:00 PM JUDICIARY

Note: the audio and video recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.

Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ HB 201 DEFENSE OF PUB. OFFICER: ETHICS COMPLAINT TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
-- Public Testimony --
+= HJR 15 CONST. AM: VOTES NEEDED FOR VETO OVERRIDE TELECONFERENCED
Moved HJR 15 Out of Committee
+= HB 133 JUVENILES: JUSTICE,FACILITES,TREATMENT TELECONFERENCED
Moved HB 133 Out of Committee
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
        HB 201-DEFENSE OF PUB. OFFICER: ETHICS COMPLAINT                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:15:49 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN announced  that the next order of  business would be                                                               
HOUSE BILL NO.  201, "An Act relating to  legal representation of                                                               
public officers in ethics complaints."                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:16:30 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  GABRIELLE LEDOUX,  Alaska  State Legislature,  as                                                               
prime sponsor  introduced HB 201.   She stated  that HB 201  is a                                                               
simple  bill.   She remarked  that in  the past,  when an  ethics                                                               
complaint has been  filed against the governor  or the lieutenant                                                               
governor, the defense  of the complaint has  not been represented                                                               
by  the attorney  general.    She remarked  that  there are  some                                                               
regulations in  the works that  will allow the  attorney general,                                                               
in his/her  sole discretion,  to determine  whether to  defend an                                                               
ethics  complaint against  the governor  or lieutenant  governor.                                                               
She expressed that  she thinks returning to  the regulations that                                                               
previously existed is  the proper way to go.   She explained that                                                               
in the system  proposed under HB 201, the  governor or lieutenant                                                               
governor would pay his/her own fees  up front, or the state would                                                               
pay  the  fees up  front  when  necessary,  and he/she  would  be                                                               
reimbursed  after he/she  was completely  exonerated.   She added                                                               
that she  does not think it  is appropriate to spend  state funds                                                               
when the governor or lieutenant  governor may have done something                                                               
unethical and  is not completely  exonerated.  She  remarked that                                                               
HB 201 "takes  us back to the status quo  and doesn't allow those                                                               
regulations to supersede the status quo."                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX  remarked that  she would  like to  make it                                                               
perfectly clear  that HB 201  is not  a criticism of  the current                                                               
governor  or  lieutenant  governor  of Alaska;  as  a  matter  of                                                               
course, she  said that she thinks  it is more appropriate  for an                                                               
individual who has been charged  with an ethics violation to have                                                               
his/her  fees paid  by the  state only  if he/she  is exonerated.                                                               
She added that she does not  think the attorney general should be                                                               
defending the governor or lieutenant governor.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:19:51 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE STUTES  asked whether  HB 201 would  be applicable                                                               
to legislators overall, in addition to the executive branch.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:19:59 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX  answered that  HB 201  would not  apply to                                                               
legislators.   She  offered her  understanding that  currently, a                                                               
legislator  pays  his/her  own  fees  and  can  then  go  to  the                                                               
Legislative Council  for reimbursement,  if he/she  is completely                                                               
exonerated.   She added that she  thinks it would be  a good idea                                                               
to put  a reimbursement policy  into statute, rather  than having                                                               
an anecdotal system which legislators  may know about through its                                                               
previous use by another legislator.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  STUTES asked  Representative  LeDoux whether  she                                                               
would  propose   that  a  legislator  exonerated   of  an  ethics                                                               
violation complaint  go to  the Legislative  Council and  ask for                                                               
reimbursement,  or whether  she  proposes  an established  system                                                               
that automatically reimburses an exonerated legislator.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX clarified  that  she is  not suggesting  a                                                               
change to the  current system.  She opined that  if the committee                                                               
was concerned  about this  issue and  wanted to  amend HB  201 to                                                               
include legislators, the system should  work the same way it does                                                               
currently.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:22:58 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN remarked that  the committee had discussed                                                               
how HB 201  would affect the legislative  and executive branches.                                                               
He  questioned  how the  proposed  legislation  would affect  the                                                               
judicial branch;  for example, what  would happen if a  judge was                                                               
involved in an ethics violation complaint?                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX  replied that she  did not know  the answer                                                               
to that question,  but Dan Wayne from  Legislative Legal Services                                                               
might be able to answer the question.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
2:23:32 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
DAN  WAYNE,  Attorney,  Legislative  Legal  Counsel,  Legislative                                                               
Legal   Services,  Legislative   Affairs  Agency,   Alaska  State                                                               
Legislature, remarked that he helped to  draft HB 201.  He stated                                                               
that the  bill currently amends  the executive branch  ethics act                                                               
only.  Referencing  page 1, lines 5-6, of HB  201, he pointed out                                                               
some cited  sections of  the Alaska  Executive Branch  Ethics Act                                                               
which could  be potential hurdles to  reimbursing public officers                                                               
in the executive branch in an exoneration.                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:24:17 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN  clarified that Representative  Eastman did  not ask                                                               
about  the executive  branch; he  asked  what would  happen if  a                                                               
judicial officer was accused of an ethics violation.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
MR. WAYNE replied that he  thinks judicial officers follow a code                                                               
of ethics that they administer  themselves through the Alaska Bar                                                               
Association or the Alaska Supreme Court.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN  remarked that he  thinks it is called  the Judicial                                                               
Conduct Commission,  which consists  of members appointed  by the                                                               
governor and approved by the legislature.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR.  WAYNE replied  that he  thinks  Chair Claman  might be  more                                                               
knowledgeable on  the topic than  he is, and probably  also knows                                                               
that this is not in statute or regulated by the legislature.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
2:25:22 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  CLAMAN  stated  that  he  did not  think  that  Mr.  Wayne                                                               
provided  the  answer  the  committee was  looking  for,  and  he                                                               
suggested  that someone  from the  court system  or the  Judicial                                                               
Conduct Commission  answer the  question for  the committee  at a                                                               
future  time.     He  remarked   that  the  question   he  thinks                                                               
Representative Eastman is hoping to  hear an answer to is whether                                                               
the state  ends up  paying when  there is  a complaint  against a                                                               
judge.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:26:03 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN confirmed  that  that is  correct; he  is                                                               
hoping to find out who pays  in that situation and the effects of                                                               
extending HB 201 beyond just the executive branch.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
2:26:39 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX reiterated that HB  201 only applies to the                                                               
executive branch, but if the committee  were to amend the bill to                                                               
include the other  branches, she is sure it would  get answers to                                                               
all those questions.                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
2:27:05 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN remarked that  he noticed it was mentioned                                                               
that HB  201 was introduced  in response to a  regulation change,                                                               
and he  wondered why  HB 201  would be a  better option  than the                                                               
legislature clarifying the regulation itself.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX  replied  that   she  had  approached  the                                                               
Legislative  Legal Counsel  and asked  to have  something drafted                                                               
that would address  the new regulations, which she  does not want                                                               
to see go in to effect.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
2:27:54 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN  asked whether the reimbursement  structure would be                                                               
a "pay to  be paid clause," in which the  executive would have to                                                               
write  a  check to  his/her  attorney  for representation  on  an                                                               
ethics violation complaint and would  then seek reimbursement, or                                                               
the  executive would  be  able  to send  the  bills directly  for                                                               
payment and not  have to pay out-of-pocket at  all, unless he/she                                                               
lost the ethics  violation complaint, in which  case he/she would                                                               
have to pay the fees back.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:28:29 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX  replied that she  thinks the idea  is that                                                               
an executive could  either pay up front and be  reimbursed by the                                                               
state if  he/she is exonerated, or  the state could pay  the fees                                                               
and the  individual would have to  agree to pay the  fees back if                                                               
he/she  were not  totally  exonerated.   She  suggested that  Mr.                                                               
Wayne might have more information on the subject.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:29:02 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. WAYNE  remarked that HB  201 does not  go into detail  on who                                                               
the payment  would go to; it  just specifies that there  would be                                                               
an   authorization  of   reimbursement.      He  suggested   that                                                               
reimbursement  could  be  interpreted  differently  by  different                                                               
people.    As  an  example,  he explained  that  money  could  go                                                               
directly  from the  stated  to a  law firm  and  could be  called                                                               
reimbursement.  He expressed that  the bill was based on existing                                                               
regulations, which  is where the  criteria for  reimbursement was                                                               
drawn.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:30:04 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN, referencing  page 1,  lines 9-11,  of HB
201,  stated, "It  would seem  to me  that somebody  could accept                                                               
reimbursement  before the  case is  finally adjudicated,  because                                                               
otherwise why are we  asking them to pay it back  if it turns out                                                               
they're not fully exonerated?"                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:30:24 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  CLAMAN,  referencing the  eighth  edition  of Black's  Law                                                             
Dictionary,   defined   reimbursement   as:     "Repayment"   and                                                             
"Indemnification."   He  added that  indemnification was  defined                                                               
as:   "The action of  compensating for loss or  damage sustained"                                                               
and "The compensation so made."                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN asked  Representative LeDoux  whether she                                                               
considers  everything pertaining  to the  current regulations  as                                                               
excellent,  considering  that  HB   201  would  put  the  current                                                               
regulations into  statute, or whether  there are some  areas that                                                               
work better  than others.   Referencing  page 1,  line 11,  of HB
201, he remarked that it  states, "exonerated of all violations".                                                               
He  expressed  that  he  thinks  there could  be  more  than  one                                                               
allegation lodged against  an executive official at a  time.  For                                                               
example,  if  one  is  an  egregious  violation  that  he/she  is                                                               
exonerated  of  but  the  other  is a  minor  violation  akin  to                                                               
littering  that he/she  is found  guilty of,  then the  executive                                                               
official  would  be required  to  pay  for  the expenses  of  the                                                               
egregious offense  that he/she was  exonerated of, even  if those                                                               
expenses comprised 99 percent of the total cost.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
2:33:08 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX replied  that Representative  Eastman made                                                               
an excellent point,  and she had wondered if it  might make sense                                                               
to  consider  a system  similar  to  that  used  in a  court  fee                                                               
situation with  attorney fees, where  fees are reimbursed  if the                                                               
individual is exonerated on most of the charges.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
2:34:03 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN remarked that in  a court fee system, the prevailing                                                               
party is  entitled to  get back  his/her attorney  fees; however,                                                               
the attorney  fees are almost never  100 percent fees.   He asked                                                               
Representative LeDoux  whether this factors  in to how  she would                                                               
approach the situation.                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX replied that she  is not certain.  She said                                                               
that she thinks  in public interest litigation it  is 100 percent                                                               
of the fees,  and she thinks that if the  individual prevailed on                                                               
99 percent of  the claims, he/she would be  reimbursed 99 percent                                                               
of  his/her fees.    She  remarked that  HB  201  was written  to                                                               
parallel the  existing regulations, but  she is not  sure herself                                                               
of what the correct approach is.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
2:35:50 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  STUTES  asked  whether she  understood  correctly                                                               
that  an  official  must  be   exonerated  in  order  to  receive                                                               
reimbursement.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX  replied that  that is not  the case.   She                                                               
Referenced  language on  page 1,  lines  9-11, of  HB 201,  which                                                               
read:   "A public  officer or former  public officer  who accepts                                                               
the  reimbursement under  this section  shall promptly  repay all                                                               
money  received  if   the  officer  is  not   exonerated  of  all                                                               
violations."  She remarked that  an official could accept payment                                                               
to begin  with, as  not everyone  has the funds  to pay  up front                                                               
out-of-pocket.                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  STUTES remarked  that  she thinks  Representative                                                               
LeDoux  may have  just  made  a point  for  her;  if an  official                                                               
doesn't have the funds to pay  up front, and the state covers the                                                               
up front cost but the official  is not exonerated, when the state                                                               
looks for  the official to pay  back those fees he/she  might not                                                               
pay the fees back.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
2:37:17 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  CLAMAN remarked  that "nothing  of Representative  Stutes'                                                               
question is to  suggest that any legislator, or  the governor, is                                                               
a deadbeat."                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  STUTES remarked  that that  is certainly  not the                                                               
case.   She asked whether there  would be an adversity  to having                                                               
legislation requiring  an official to  be exonerated in  order to                                                               
apply  for  reimbursement.    She  added  that  she  thinks  most                                                               
attorneys would be amenable to that idea.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
2:37:49 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX  replied  that  many  attorneys  might  be                                                               
amenable to  that idea, if there  were a standard in  place which                                                               
allowed for most  prevailing counts - and not all  counts - to be                                                               
exonerated.  She  added that she thinks there  would be political                                                               
considerations; not only would the  official be facing the stigma                                                               
of having  faced an ethics  violation, he/she would have  to face                                                               
his/her    next   election    with    public   knowledge    that,                                                               
"Representative so-and-so is  a deadbeat; they owe  the state 'X'                                                               
number of dollars."                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:39:08 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE   STUTES  remarked   that  she   appreciated  what                                                               
Representative  LeDoux was  saying; however,  she recounted  that                                                               
many people  in Juneau have commented  to her that they  will not                                                               
rent to legislators, as they will  not pay their rent.  She added                                                               
that she has  heard this approximately four  times from different                                                               
people.                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX commented  that  she  finds that  somewhat                                                               
appalling.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:39:40 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  CLAMAN noted  that there  is potential  for an  attorney's                                                               
fees  bill to  range from  $25,000  to $50,000  in a  complicated                                                               
ethics  violation case.   He  stated  that the  questions of  the                                                               
ability to repay and whether  the state should be advancing these                                                               
funds are  significant.  He  added that these dollar  amounts may                                                               
not seem to be big items  compared to some of the items discussed                                                               
in the state  budget; however, public suspicion may  be raised if                                                               
funds were being  routinely advanced for fees  relating to ethics                                                               
complaints,  where  the essence  of  the  complaint is  that  the                                                               
official is acting outside of the law.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:40:41 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  EASTMAN asked  whether the  executive branch  has                                                               
the same limitations  on accepting legal help  as the legislative                                                               
branch.  He clarified that in  the legislative branch it would be                                                               
considered  unethical  for  a  legislator   to  accept  pro  bono                                                               
representation  from  an  attorney,  as it  would  be  considered                                                               
accepting a gift over $250.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
2:41:32 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE LEDOUX replied  that she did not  know whether the                                                               
executive  branch has  the same  limitations  as the  legislative                                                               
branch, but her understanding is  that the legislative branch can                                                               
set up  a legal defense fund,  which is not governed  by the $250                                                               
gift rule.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
2:42:37 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR   CLAMAN  asked   Mr.  Wayne   whether  he   could  clarify                                                               
Representative LeDoux's comment and question.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:42:47 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. WAYNE  asked Representative LeDoux whether  she could clarify                                                               
her question.                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
2:43:09 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  LEDOUX clarified  that the  question was  whether                                                               
the  executive  branch has  the  same  restrictions on  receiving                                                               
money as the  legislative branch.  In addition,  she repeated her                                                               
understanding  that the  legislative branch  can set  up a  legal                                                               
defense fund, which is not governed by the $250 gift rule.                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR.  WAYNE  responded that  he  did  not  know whether  this  was                                                               
correct.   He remarked  that it  could raise  a concern  under AS                                                               
24.60.080  for  a legislator  accepting  a  gift of  legal  fees;                                                               
however, he  stated that  he did  not know if  there has  been an                                                               
exception carved out for that.                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
2:44:35 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE EASTMAN  asked whether  anyone could  clarify what                                                               
the limitations are on the  executive branch regarding gifts.  He                                                               
remarked that  during his  time on the  Ethics Committee,  it was                                                               
explained to him  that the committee's understanding  was that an                                                               
official charged  with a violation  could not receive  legal help                                                               
totaling over $250  in a calendar year.  Replying  to a follow-up                                                               
question from Chair  Claman, he clarified that  an attorney could                                                               
volunteer  only $250  worth  of his/her  time  and nothing  more,                                                               
regardless of whether it was offered as pro bono.                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
2:45:48 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR CLAMAN  asked Mr.  Wayne whether  he could  provide insight                                                               
into what  the limitations are  on the executive branch  in terms                                                               
of acquiring  legal advice  from outside  counsel.   He clarified                                                               
that  he  thinks  Representative   Eastman's  question  was  very                                                               
specific:    If the  governor  has  an ethics  complaint  brought                                                               
against him/her, and  asks for advice from  an attorney regarding                                                               
the complaint,  the governor is  barred from getting  advice that                                                               
would equate to over $250 pro bono.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
2:46:27 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. WAYNE replied that this  would fall under AS 39.52.130(a)(b),                                                               
which read as follows:                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
      Sec. 39.52.130.   Improper gifts.                                                                                         
          (a) A  public officer may not  solicit, accept, or                                                                    
     receive,  directly or  indirectly, a  gift, whether  in                                                                    
     the   form    of   money,   service,    loan,   travel,                                                                    
     entertainment, hospitality, employment,  promise, or in                                                                    
     any  other form,  that is  a benefit  to the  officer's                                                                    
     personal  or financial  interests, under  circumstances                                                                    
     in which it could reasonably  be inferred that the gift                                                                    
     is intended  to influence  the performance  of official                                                                    
     duties,  actions, or  judgment.  A gift  from a  person                                                                    
     required to  register as a lobbyist  under AS 24.45.041                                                                    
     to  a public  officer or  a public  officer's immediate                                                                    
     family member  is presumed to be  intended to influence                                                                    
     the  performance   of  official  duties,   actions,  or                                                                    
     judgment  unless  the  giver  is  an  immediate  family                                                                    
     member of the person receiving the gift.                                                                                   
          (b) Notice of  the receipt by a  public officer of                                                                    
     a gift  with a value  in excess of $150,  including the                                                                    
     name of  the giver  and a description  of the  gift and                                                                    
     its  approximate   value,  must  be  provided   to  the                                                                    
     designated supervisor within 30  days after the date of                                                                    
     its receipt                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. WAYNE interpreted that if a  gift is worth more than $150, it                                                               
must  be reported,  but he  was not  sure if  there is  a defined                                                               
upper limit to what could be accepted.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
2:47:50 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  CLAMAN  asked Mr.  Wayne  whether  his  view was  that  an                                                               
officer is  not prohibited from  receiving services  greater than                                                               
$250, just  that the  services must be  declared after  they have                                                               
exceeded the $250 amount.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
MR.  WAYNE answered  that he  does not  see a  limitation defined                                                               
anywhere in  statute, unlike AS  24.60.080, which applies  to the                                                               
legislature and has  a defined yearly limit.  He  said that it is                                                               
possible the  attorney general has  established a limit  based on                                                               
statute, but he does not know for sure.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
2:49:04 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The committee took a brief at-ease at 2:49 p.m.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
2:49:24 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  CLAMAN  opened   public  testimony  on  HB   201.    After                                                               
ascertaining  that there  was no  one who  wished to  testify, he                                                               
closed public testimony.  He announced  that HB 201 would be held                                                               
for further review.                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
HB 201 v. U 2.10.2020.PDF HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/17/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/24/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HB 201 Sponsor Statement 2.10.2020.pdf HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/17/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJUD 2/24/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 201
HJR 15 v. M 1.21.2020.PDF HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HSTA 1/23/2020 3:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 Sponsor Statement 1.21.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HSTA 1/23/2020 3:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 Sectional Analysis v. M 1.21.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HSTA 1/23/2020 3:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 Supporting Document - NCSL Table 1.21.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HSTA 1/23/2020 3:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 Presentation 2.5.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 Testimony HJUD Received by 2.7.2020.pdf HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 v. M Amendment #1 HJUD 2.10.2020.pdf HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 Fiscal Note OOG-DOE 1.29.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HJR 15 v. M Amendment #1 HJUD (Withdrawn) 2.10.2020.pdf HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HJR 15
HB 133 v. M 2.3.2020.PDF HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Sponsor Statement 2.3.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Sectional Analysis v. M 2.3.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Supporting Document - One-Sheeter 2.3.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Supporting Document - Carey Case 4.22.2019.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Supporting Document - Temporary Secure Juvenile Holding Areas 2.3.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Supporting Document - Questions and Answers 2.3.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Supporting Document - DJJ Letter 5.13.19.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 PowerPoint Presentation 2.4.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Memo to HJUD 2.6.2020.pdf HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133
HB 133 Fiscal Note DHSS-PS 1.16.2020.pdf HJUD 2/5/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/7/2020 1:45:00 PM
HJUD 2/10/2020 1:00:00 PM
HB 133