Legislature(2023 - 2024)DAVIS 106
02/24/2024 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB275 | |
HB264 | |
HB196 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 275 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 264 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 196 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 275-SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAMINATION KITS/TRACKING 3:04:24 PM CHAIR PRAX announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 275, "An Act relating to sexual assault examination kits; establishing the sexual assault examination kit tracking system; and providing for an effective date." 3:05:21 PM LISA PURINTON, Director, Division of Statewide Services, Legislative Liaison, Department of Public Safety, spoke in support of HB 275. She explained the bill would codify existing processes and streamline the requirements for processing the sexual assault examination kit. It would require the Department of Public Safety to develop and maintain a system where the sexual assault kits are tracked from the manufacturer through completion of the testing at the state crime lab. The department has sought federal funding and has purchased and implemented this tracking kit system. It is in place, and the department has worked with medical services and providers, law enforcement agencies, and prosecutors to implement and employ the system statewide. The benefit of the system is that it allows accountability and also allows victims of sexual assault to identify the location and the completion of the test. It sets timelines for lab processing; timelines for law enforcement to collect the kits; and timelines for the medical providers to complete the kits and notify law enforcement. 3:08:17 PM CHAIR PRAX opened public testimony on HB 275. 3:08:39 PM KATY BOTZ, representing self, testified in support of HB 275. She described it as a good clean bill and victim oriented. She discussed the trauma of sexual assault and shared her personal experience. 3:10:54 PM LAUREE MORTON, representing self, testified in support of HB 275. She explained that originally, she had planned to speak in her role as deputy director of the Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault (ANDVSA), which also supports the bill; however, she decided to testify for herself. She shared a personal experience and described how difficult it is to speak and how control is taken away. Being able to track the kit would be using technology to bring comfort and a semblance of autonomy. She appreciates the bill giving a victim rights and allowing them to have agency over what happens to them and about them. MS. MORTON also spoke in an official capacity briefly describing the work of the Network. 3:15:29 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether the tracking kits are also a benefit for victims of domestic violence. MS. MORTON explained that under victims' rights, domestic violence victims have opportunities to keep informed through the prosecutor's office. The system is supposed to be responsive to victims of domestic violence. The Department of Public Safety is working to improve access to those rights through victim navigator services. 3:17:33 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER commented that there had been a system for gathering sexual assault evidence. The genesis of this bill is the realization that processing those kits is not happening in a timely fashion. He questioned whether the system for domestic violence is working. MS. MORTON replied that things can always be better. She expanded by explaining that parts are better and pointed out opportunities for improvement. 3:18:40 PM REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK asked about the deficiencies in access to services for individuals living in rural and Bush communities. MS. MORTON touched upon some of her early work in Bethel. There is an awareness of law enforcement deficiencies, response times are difficult, and weather plays a part. She described the network's advocacy programs are the emergency departments in the system. They need to be available and fully equipped, fully staffed 24/7, 365 days a year. They catch people as they are falling. She explained that not enough is done to fund and support victim services and said, "We are still doing bake sales." In the broader context, the criminal justice response is necessary, but the vision of what is possible needs to be expanded to reach the Alaska women who are victims of sexual assault and/or domestic violence. 3:23:16 PM REPRESENTATIVE MCCORMICK expressed his appreciation of the work done to assist Alaska women in crises. 3:23:35 PM MOLLIE MONTAGUE, Director, State Legislative Affairs, Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network (RAINN), spoke in support of HB 275. She discussed the history of RAINN and its work with victims and survivors. She provided examples relating to the importance of transparency and timely processing of rape kits, and mentioned other states that are employing similar ideas. 3:26:12 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER expressed his appreciation for the national perspective and asked whether other states have a similar tracking system to the one proposed by this bill. MS. MONTAGUE replied that she would look at her organization's research and get back to the committee. 3:27:01 PM TARA HENRY, representing self, explained that the concept of HB 275 is good but would have unintended negative consequences. She described the difficulty of meeting the seven-day deadline and the difficulties for nursing and medical staff. She described the steps medical staff must follow in order to complete the kits and stated it was unreasonable to legislate a time limit without discussion with Alaska's healthcare providers. 3:31:32 PM REPRESENTATIVE MINA asked what the average turnaround time would be for a forensic nurse to process a sexual assault examination kit. MS. HENRY discussed a number of factors that would affect the time to process a kit and gave examples of issues. She speculated that the busier programs might take approximately 10 days, but there was not enough information for an informed opinion. 3:33:59 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether Ms. Henry was aware of any other states that have similar tracking requirements and what time frames they have. The committee would like to stay current with best practices and would like to know how other states approach these timelines. MS. HENRY replied that some other states have timelines. Best practices are as soon as possible, ideally within three business days. But there are not many statutes in other states that mandate time frames. Most of the time frames range from 24 hours to a couple weeks to release that information to law enforcement. Things to take into consideration are what the processes are in specific communities, what documentation is required, and the volume of caseloads. Because Alaska just started the tracking system, there is not a lot of data at this time. 3:37:15 PM MAXINE DOOGAN, President, Community United for Safety & Protection, spoke in opposition to HB 275. She explained that her organization's members are Alaska current and former sex workers, sex trafficking victims, and their allies. She expressed concern regarding privacy and that law enforcement might be able to keep the DNA of rape victims for other purposes. 3:39:02 PM The committee took an at-ease from 3:29 to 3:40 p.m. 3:40:37 PM BURCU SAGIROGLU, Policy and Advocacy Associate, Joyful Heart Foundation, spoke in favor of HB 275. He explained the organization he works with has a top priority of processing the backlog of untested rape kits. He discussed how law enforcement, hospitals, and medical facilities have dealt with rape kits. He provided information regarding deadlines for various states. He also discussed the importance of transparency and being able to track the progress of the kits as they are being processed. 3:43:23 PM CHAIR PRAX, after ascertaining there was no one else who wished to testify, closed public testimony on HB 275. 3:43:58 PM CHAIR PRAX announced HB 275 was held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 275 Amendment A.3 #3.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 275 Amendment A.4 #4.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 275 ANDVSA Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 275 Joyful Heart Support.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 275 Support from Alaska Group.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 275 Community United Opposition.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 275 LOS Support.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 196 Fiscal Note DOH-PAFS Revised.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 196 |
HB 196 Fiscal Note DOH-QC Revised.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 196 |
HB 196 White Mountain Support.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 196 |
HB 275 K Botz Support.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 275 |
HB 264 T Rothchild Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 264 |
HB 264 A Nickerson Testimony.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 264 |
HB 264 - Study on Human Trafficking Screening Tool.pdf |
HHSS 2/24/2024 3:00:00 PM |
HB 264 |