Legislature(2023 - 2024)GRUENBERG 120
04/04/2024 09:00 AM House FISHERIES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB297 | |
HB294 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 297 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 294 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HB 297-SPORT FISHING ANGLER ACCESS ACCT/SURCHARGE 10:07:44 AM CHAIR VANCE announced that the first order of business would be HOUSE BILL NO. 297, "An Act establishing the sport fishing angler access account; establishing the sport fishing angler access surcharge; and providing for an effective date." 10:07:47 AM CHAIR VANCE opened public testimony. After ascertaining that there was no one who wished to testify, she closed public testimony. 10:09:56 AM REPRESENTATIVE STUTES expressed the opinion that the fees associated with HB 297 would be reasonable. REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed the intention to offer an amendment to add $1 to the $4 surcharge, so an economic impact study could be done. He argued that [an impact study on sport fish] has not been done in over 20 years, and Alaska needs to know what has happened since the COVID-19 pandemic. He stressed that the state needs the data so there could be a logical debate. In response to a question from Representative Stutes, he stated that the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) should do this. He suggested that it would be better coming from ADF&G than an industry group, and it should be funded through sport fish licenses. REPRESENTATIVE HIMSCHOOT posed a hypothetical for a possible sport fish study, and she questioned whether increasing the fee by $1 would be the correct mechanism. 10:12:57 AM DOUG VINCENT-LANG, Commissioner, Department of Fish and Game, answered questions on HB 297, on behalf of House Rules by request of the governor. He responded that there have been many requests for an updated study on sport fish, but there has been no funding. He suggested that the funding [from the proposed fee increase] would need to be built up over a few years, as some of the work would need to be contracted out. In response to a follow up question, he expressed the intention to build up the funding over time, so the survey could be periodically conducted. 10:14:29 AM CHAIR VANCE pointed out that the proposed legislation does not have a sunset date. She referenced the sunset of a previous hatchery surcharge and questioned the justification for the proposed legislation not having a sunset date. She questioned the cost of a sport fish license when the hatchery surcharge had been in effect. COMMISSIONER VINCENT LANG responded that the hatchery surcharge was created to pay off a bond, and it was calculated for this. Per statute, once the bond was paid off, the surcharge went away; therefore, it was not a sunset date. He stated that given the license sells, the bond was paid off earlier than thought. He explained that the proposed legislation does not have a sunset clause because angler access funding would still be needed in the future. CHAIR VANCE reiterated the question on the cost of a sport fish license when the hatchery surcharge had been in effect. 10:16:01 AM JOSEPH FELKL, Legislative Liaison, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, answered questions on HB 297, on behalf of House Rules by request of the governor. He responded that the hatchery surcharge amount had been an additional $5, so the fee for an annual resident sport fish license was $29. In response to a follow-up question, he stated that the fee is now less than what residents had paid while there was a hatchery surcharge. 10:16:33 AM REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE questioned how the cost of fishing licenses in Alaska compares with other states. COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded that Alaskan residents "get a fairly good deal." He expressed the opinion that the state probably does not have the lowest cost, but it is low. CHAIR VANCE questioned the fact that individuals from the Yukon in Canada pay the same sport fishing license fees as resident Alaskans. She questioned this reasoning. COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded that this has been in effect for a long time in a "friendship effort" with the Yukon government. He explained that the reasoning is because the Yukon Territory is landlocked with no access to marine waters. CHAIR VANCE questioned if it is known how many Canadians utilize the license. She expressed the understanding there have been concerns in Southeast Alaska that the fisheries are being abused. She questioned if there is any up-to-date justification for the fees the Yukoners receive. She pointed out that there is a responsibility by the legislature to put Alaskans first. COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG responded that the number of these permits could be provided. He estimated that there are around 35,000 Yukoners, but not everyone comes to Alaska to fish. He approximated that there are around 100 permits annually. He expressed the opinion that these permits are not affecting conservation, and he added that this is not allowed for personal-use fishing. CHAIR VANCE questioned whether Alaskans receive any reciprocal benefits. COMMISSIONER VINCENT-LANG stated that negotiations on this have been opened. In response to a follow-up question, he stated that Canadians have had this benefit for around 20 years. 10:21:00 AM REPRESENTATIVE STUTES questioned what is considered "marine fishing." COMMISSIONER VINCENT LANG responded that "marine fishing" is sport fishing that occurs in marine waters. 10:21:37 AM CHAIR VANCE announced that HB 297 was held over.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 297 - Transmittal Letter v.A.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
HB 297 - v.A.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
HB 297 - Sectional Analysis v.A.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
HB 297 - ADF&G-SF Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
HB 297 - Supporting Document Surcharge Revenue Breakdown 01.31.24.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
HB 294 - Transmittal Letter v.A.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
HB 294 - v.A.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
HB 294 - Sectional Analysis v.A.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
HB 294 - ADF&G-SFM Fiscal Note.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
HB 294 - UFA Letter of Opposition.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
HB 297 - Supporting Document License Fees & Surcharge (04-04-24).pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 297 |
HB 294 - UFA Letter of Opposition.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
HB 294 - Letters of Opposition.pdf |
HFSH 4/4/2024 9:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |