Legislature(2019 - 2020)ADAMS 519
03/02/2020 01:30 PM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB127 | |
HB159 | |
HB182 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | HB 127 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 159 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | HB 182 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE BILL NO. 159 "An Act relating to repayment conditions for medical education program participants." 3:07:37 PM Co-Chair Johnston reviewed the testifiers that were available online. 3:08:09 PM REPRESENTATIVE JONATHAN KREISS-TOMKINS, BILL SPONSOR, explained that HB 159 would increase the repayment by a WWAMI Program alumni from 50 percent to 100 percent if that person did not return to Alaska to practice medicine once completing medical school and a residency. Currently, if a WWAMI participant did not return to the state to practice, they were expected to pay 50 percent of the difference between the cost of out-of-state tuition at the University of Washington Medical School and the amount the state was contributing to incentivize its young people to go to medical school and return to practice in Alaska. 3:09:57 PM Representative Tilton asked if he had an idea of the number of people who utilized the WWAMI program who did not return to Alaska. She asked for the criteria for residency. Representative Kreiss-Tompkins deferred to his staff. 3:10:56 PM KEVIN MCGOWAN, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE JONATHAN KREISS- TOMPKINS, reported that about 40 percent of students did not return to the state. Dr. Suzanne Allen from WWAMI was available online. 3:11:28 PM DR. SUZANNE ALLEN, PROGRAM DIRECTOR, WWAMI PROGRAM (via teleconference), responded that currently between 14-15 out of 20 WWAMI students each year returned as physicians to Alaska. In looking specifically at Alaskans returning to the state, the number might be slightly lower, 12-13 students, as there were WWAMI students from the other participating states, 4 in all, that end up practicing in Alaska. Mr. McGowan responded to the question about residency. A person must be a resident for at least 2 years before being allowed into the WWAMI Program. Representative Tilton asked what would determine whether someone was practicing in Alaska after completing their studies. Mr. McGowan replied that a student must practice for 3 years in a rural community or 5 years in an urban community after completing the program to qualify. Vice-Chair Ortiz asked whether implementing the bill would change or dissuade the states talent pool from participating. Representative Kreiss-Tompkins spoke from the perspective of the legislature. He thought the program was stellar. He had several friends who had either gone through the WWAMI program or were currently participating in it. He thought it was important to remember the prestige of the program as well. The University of Washington was one of the best medical schools in the country and extremely difficult to get into. He suggested there was a golden brick path for Alaskans through the WWAMI program for the set-aside spots that were highly sought after. He thought it was a consideration that weighed heavily with many applicants. He thought there might be a dissuasive effect for some applicants. However, given some conversations and the prestigious reputation of the University of Washington, he thought it would be a relatively small factor. 3:17:23 PM Co-Chair Johnston noted that Representative Knopp and Representative Josephson had joined the meeting. Representative Wool asked if scholarships were commonly given out for medical school. Representative Kreiss-Tompkins responded affirmatively. He had friends that had attended medical school and who had received merit and other scholarships. If the representatives question related to whether WWAMI students could receive other scholarships in addition to in-state tuition through WWAMI, he was uncertain. He deferred to Dr. Allen. 3:18:04 PM Dr. Allen responded that Alaska WWAMI students were eligible to receive scholarships. There were some scholarships specific to Alaska WWAMI students and other general scholarships. She elaborated that WWAMI students received scholarships, federal grants, and loans to help with tuition and living expenses during their 4 years of medical school. 3:18:37 PM Representative Wool asked if the scholarships were based on need or academic performance. Dr. Allen did not have the breakdown but both applied. Representative Wool suggested that if a student was accepted and was weighing more than one option, the scholarship payback percentage might influence their decision. Representative Kreiss-Tompkins agreed that there was a possibility of behavior changes with the passage of the bill. However, it was difficult to assign a correlating fiscal impact. The legislation would have a negative fiscal impact on the budget which was part of the reason he had pursued the bill. The impact would be about $600,000 per year but, the figure assumed no behavior change. He indicated that if the passage of the bill proved to be an incentive for WWAMI participants to return to Alaska to practice medicine, the negative fiscal impact of the bill could be eroded. The fiscal impact could be $500,000 or $400,000 per year. He thought it was difficult to determine what behavior changes might occur as a result of the legislation. He argued that it could be positive for Alaska if a greater percentage of WWAMI alumni came back to practice medicine in the state. He thought it would be unreasonable to think there would be zero behavior change on the front end, as he thought it would rebalance medical school applicants decisions. Depending on a financial package and the overall tuition of a school would influence a students decision. He suggested students would be making a slightly different choice with the passage of the bill than without. 3:22:32 PM Representative Wool supposed that if the program was completely successful, all 20 students would come back to the state and the state would have to reimburse all of them. It would cost Alaska more money but, it would have more practicing physicians. Representative Kreiss-Tompkins responded that if 100 percent of alumni returned, it would be beneficial for Alaska. He was unsure of the fiscal crossover point. Co-Chair Johnston directed Representative Kreiss-Tompkins to review the sectional analysis which she anticipated would be brief. Mr. McGowan reviewed the sectional analysis. Section 1 of the bill amended AS.14.43.51(a) and increased the repayment from 50 percent to 100 percent plus interest for students that did not return to the state upon completing the WWAMI Program. Section 2 of the bill specified an effective date which applied to students who entered the agreement on or after the effective date of the act. 3:25:11 PM Representative Kreiss-Tompkins offered that the bill came about in order to make a structural change to take pressure off of the budget in the long term. At one point the WWAMI Program was slated for a gubernatorial veto. It was a compromise in response to a conversation he had had with the governors chief of staff. The compromised allowed for the placement of the WWAMI Program into a stable long-term place. He wanted to provide context to the origin of the bill. Co-Chair Johnston set the bill aside. HB 159 was HEARD and HELD in committee for further consideration. 3:26:45 PM AT EASE 3:28:33 PM RECONVENED HH
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
HB 159 Sponsor Statement 1.31.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 159 |
HB 127 v. M Sponsor Statement 2.28.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 127 |
HB 127 v. M Sectional Analysis 2.28.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 127 |
HB 127 v. M Explanation of Changes 2.28.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 127 |
HB 182 Sponsor Statement 2.28.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 182 |
HB 182 DNA arrest KTVA 11 9.6.19.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 182 |
HB 182 Explanation of Changes v. U 2.12.20.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 182 |
HB 127 v. M Index of Letters of Support 3.1.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 127 |
HB 127 Slideshow 3.1.2020.pdf |
HFIN 3/2/2020 1:30:00 PM |
HB 127 |