Legislature(1993 - 1994)
04/13/1993 08:30 AM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HOUSE BILL NO. 212
"An Act relating to a factor in aggravation of the
presumptive term of a criminal sentence, and
prohibiting the referral of a sentence based on
application of that factor to a three-judge sentencing
panel as an extraordinary circumstance."
Co-Chair MacLean explained that the intent of HB 212 is to
insure offenders receive the most serious sentences for
sexual abuse against a minor in cases where the offender is
in a position of authority to the minor or the minor lives
in the same household.
Co-Chair MacLean pointed out that the bill adds an element
of sexual abuse of a minor crimes to the list of aggravators
considered at sentencing. In addition, section 2 of the
bill furthers a similar effort of the 1992 legislature in
adding this crime to the list of crimes not to be referred
to the three judge panel.
Co-Chair MacLean emphasized that an offender would be in an
established trust relationship with a minor. She asserted
that the most serious of sentencing provisions should apply
in this situation. She noted that it is more difficult for
a child to defend him or herself, both physically and
verbally, from someone in a position of authority. She
maintained that it is the vulnerable nature of the
relationship that warrants more severe punishment.
Co-Chair MacLean felt that it is more suitable to add this
form of crime to the aggravator list rather than create an
entirely different crime category. This would ensure that
offenders receive the most severe sentence possible under
the existing ranges for these crimes.
Co-Chair MacLean noted that the Judiciary Committee made two
technical changes to the bill on page 3. On line 16, they
deleted a reference to 11.41. 440 which relates to sexual
abuse of a minor in the 4th degree, a misdemeanor crime and
not subject to felony sentencing. They also removed
language on lines 17-18, which was redundant to other
provisions of this section.
Representative Brown MOVED to report CSHB 212 (JUD) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
accompanying fiscal notes. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
CSHB 212 (JUD) was reported out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with three zero fiscal notes by the
Alaska Court System, dated 4/5/93; Department of
Corrections, dated 4/5/93; Department of Law, dated 4/5/93;
and with two zero fiscal notes by the Department of
Administration, dated 4/5/93.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|