Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/01/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB359 | |
| SSCR11 | |
| SSCR3 | |
| SSCR9 | |
| SSCR1 | |
| HB222 | |
| HB223 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 222 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 359 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SSCR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SSCR 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SSCR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SSCR11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 223 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SSCR11-DISAPPROVE EO 134
1:30:53 PM
CHAIR MCKAY announced that the next order of business would be
SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 11, Disapproving
Executive Order No. 134.
1:31:32 PM
BRENT GOODRUM, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural
Resources, gave a PowerPoint presentation, entitled "Executive
Order 134: Eliminating the Recreation Rivers Advisory Board,"
dated 3/1/24 [hard copy included in the committee packet]. He
began on slide 2, "Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers Advisory
Board," which read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
Created by Recreation Rivers Act of 1988 (AS
41.23.400-510):
The primary purpose of the Act is for the
establishment of the six recreation river
corridors for their maintenance and enhancement
of fish and wildlife population for recreation
and economic use ensuring multiple use
management.
Established a Governor-appointed, 13-member
advisory board representing:
(1) commercial fishing;
(2) sport fishing;
(3) sport hunting;
(4) conservation;
(5) subsistence
(6) forest products;
(7) mining;
(8) powerboat users;
(9) recreationally-oriented commercial users;
(10) other recreational users;
(11) private property owners within the
recreation river corridors;
(12) the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning
Commission from the membership of the planning
commission; and
13) the mayor of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough or
the designee of the mayor
MR. GOODRUM continued to side 3, "Susitna Basin Recreation
Rivers Advisory Board," which read as follows [original
punctuation provided]:
• Requires DNR write a management plan
Original Management Plan adopted in 1991
• Plan establishes management guidelines
Manage activities consistent with statutory
purposes
Protect fish, wildlife, and the river's free
flow
Identify special recreation values and manage
intensity and types of recreational use
Designate management guidelines for development
activities
Designate management guidelines for commercial
recreation activities or development
Provide for transportation and utility
corridors, public safety, and law enforcement
Provide for reasonable access
Establish criteria and timelines to review
future proposed uses for compatibility with AS
41.23.400
1:34:05 PM
MR. GOODRUM advanced to slide 4, "Advisory Board
Responsibilities," which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
The Board assists in preparing, adopting, and revising
the recreation river management plan and regulations
affecting use and management of the recreation rivers.
MR. GOODRUM noted that there have been 19 meetings scheduled
since the board's reconstitution in 2021. Quorum was not
obtained for 4 of the 19 meetings. The next scheduled meeting
of the advisory board is March 13, 2024, as a proposed work
session to review public comments submitted on the public review
draft of the proposed plan.
1:34:28 PM
MR. GOODRUM proceeded to slide 5, "Executive Order 134," which
read as follows [original punctuation provided]:
WHAT:
• Sunsets the advisory council; transfer the functions
and duties of the Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers
Advisory Board to DNR
WHY:
• Creates efficiency and establishes single point of
contact for management
• Eliminates duplication within state government
• Resulting in increased performance and
accountability
FUTURE:
• Any changes to the Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers
management plan must already go through a robust
public process in consultation with affected
municipalities, state agencies, and stakeholders that
requires public notice, public comment periods, and
meetings in the affected communities
1:35:13 PM
MR. GOODRUM concluded the presentation on slide 6 with a
sectional analysis, which read as follows [original punctuation
provided]:
Sec. 1, Page 1
Adds a new section to the uncodified law providing the
governor's findings that it is in the best interests
of efficient administration to transfer the functions
of the Recreation Rivers Advisory Board to the
Department of Natural Resources, and to eliminate the
board as it is no longer needed
Sec. 2, Page 1
Amends AS 41.23.440(a) (relating to management plans
for recreation rivers and corridors) to delete the
reference to the advisory board. The DNR commissioner
would no longer be required to consult with the board
when preparing or revising a management plan for each
of the six recreation rivers and their corridors. The
commissioner and each affected municipality would
still be required to consult with public and state
agencies
Sec. 3, Page 2
Repeals AS 41.23.430 which established the Recreation
Rivers Advisory Board
Sec. 4, Page 2
Adds a new section to the uncodified law to provide
guidelines for the transition period that would be
required by this executive order
Sec. 5, Page 3
Effective date of July 1, 2024
1:36:03 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ARMSTRONG asked Mr. Goodrum to elaborate on
inefficiencies, detail the meaning of "performance", and explain
how these measures would increase accountability.
MR. GOODRUM replied that the department does a vast majority of
the board's work already. He cited an inability to meet quorum
as contributing to the department's frustration.
1:39:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE recalled that the board was reconstituted
in 2021. He asked Mr. Goodrum to comment on the "new
[management] plan."
MR. GOODRUM confirmed that the board was in name only for a
number of decades. He said a new or updated version of the
management plan would likely be finalized and adopted.
1:41:20 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked what issues would be addressed by
the management plan.
MR. GOODRUM referred back to slides 2 and 3, which outlined the
board's interests and management guidelines.
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether there are other geological
groups of rivers similar to the Recreational Rivers Advisory
Report on Susitna.
MR. GOODRUM responded that to his knowledge, there is not
another grouping of recreational rivers within the state
containing several different water bodies being managed for
special purposes.
1:43:41 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed interest in the management plan
proposed by the board, which he characterized as restrictive and
catering to special interests. He shared his understanding that
the Susitna Basin Rivers would be put in the same category as
the boundary waters canoe area with no motorized vehicles and
limited camping. He asked how that would best serve Alaskans.
MR. GOODRUM declined to speak on behalf of the board. He
surmised that in the 1990s, the board may have anticipated the
best use of these areas with strong interests in commercial and
sport fishing. He reiterated that ultimately, the advisory
board puts forth recommendations, adding that the commissioner
decides whether to adopt them.
REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE reiterated that the plan is significantly
more extensive and restrictive to Alaskans' recreational use.
He recalled that the governor "was forced" to remove board
members in the past and asked whether the board had become too
politicized.
MR. GOODRUM shared his belief that DNR feels capable of doing
the planning on its own.
1:47:22 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether current laws are sufficient
to maintain the health of the wild recreational resources in
these rivers.
MR. GOODRUM answered yes.
[SSCR 11 was held over.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| exor0126.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 3 |
| exor0132.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
| exor0134.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR11 |
| exor0124.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 1 |
| Sect. Analysis for HB-359.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 359 |
| HB-359 PFD Cash Out Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 359 |
| EO 126 Wood-Tikchik State Park Management Council DNR Presentation 03.01.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 3 |
| 2024 Executive Order 134 - Rec Rivers Advisory Board Overview 03.01.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR11 |
| EO 132 Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Advisory Council DNR Presentation 03.01.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
| EO 132 Supporting Doc - Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Management Plan 2.1.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM SRES 2/14/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
| EO 132 Testimony - Received as of 2.13.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM SRES 2/14/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
| HB 223 HRES Amendment Packet.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/4/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 223 |
| HB 223 Legal Memo on CS.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 223 |
| HB 359 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 359 |