Legislature(2023 - 2024)BARNES 124
03/01/2024 01:00 PM House RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB359 | |
SSCR11 | |
SSCR3 | |
SSCR9 | |
SSCR1 | |
HB222 | |
HB223 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 222 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HB 359 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SSCR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SSCR 3 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SSCR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | SSCR11 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 223 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SSCR11-DISAPPROVE EO 134 1:30:53 PM CHAIR MCKAY announced that the next order of business would be SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 11, Disapproving Executive Order No. 134. 1:31:32 PM BRENT GOODRUM, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Natural Resources, gave a PowerPoint presentation, entitled "Executive Order 134: Eliminating the Recreation Rivers Advisory Board," dated 3/1/24 [hard copy included in the committee packet]. He began on slide 2, "Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers Advisory Board," which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: Created by Recreation Rivers Act of 1988 (AS 41.23.400-510): The primary purpose of the Act is for the establishment of the six recreation river corridors for their maintenance and enhancement of fish and wildlife population for recreation and economic use ensuring multiple use management. Established a Governor-appointed, 13-member advisory board representing: (1) commercial fishing; (2) sport fishing; (3) sport hunting; (4) conservation; (5) subsistence (6) forest products; (7) mining; (8) powerboat users; (9) recreationally-oriented commercial users; (10) other recreational users; (11) private property owners within the recreation river corridors; (12) the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Commission from the membership of the planning commission; and 13) the mayor of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough or the designee of the mayor MR. GOODRUM continued to side 3, "Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers Advisory Board," which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: • Requires DNR write a management plan Original Management Plan adopted in 1991 • Plan establishes management guidelines Manage activities consistent with statutory purposes Protect fish, wildlife, and the river's free flow Identify special recreation values and manage intensity and types of recreational use Designate management guidelines for development activities Designate management guidelines for commercial recreation activities or development Provide for transportation and utility corridors, public safety, and law enforcement Provide for reasonable access Establish criteria and timelines to review future proposed uses for compatibility with AS 41.23.400 1:34:05 PM MR. GOODRUM advanced to slide 4, "Advisory Board Responsibilities," which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: The Board assists in preparing, adopting, and revising the recreation river management plan and regulations affecting use and management of the recreation rivers. MR. GOODRUM noted that there have been 19 meetings scheduled since the board's reconstitution in 2021. Quorum was not obtained for 4 of the 19 meetings. The next scheduled meeting of the advisory board is March 13, 2024, as a proposed work session to review public comments submitted on the public review draft of the proposed plan. 1:34:28 PM MR. GOODRUM proceeded to slide 5, "Executive Order 134," which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: WHAT: • Sunsets the advisory council; transfer the functions and duties of the Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers Advisory Board to DNR WHY: • Creates efficiency and establishes single point of contact for management • Eliminates duplication within state government • Resulting in increased performance and accountability FUTURE: • Any changes to the Susitna Basin Recreation Rivers management plan must already go through a robust public process in consultation with affected municipalities, state agencies, and stakeholders that requires public notice, public comment periods, and meetings in the affected communities 1:35:13 PM MR. GOODRUM concluded the presentation on slide 6 with a sectional analysis, which read as follows [original punctuation provided]: Sec. 1, Page 1 Adds a new section to the uncodified law providing the governor's findings that it is in the best interests of efficient administration to transfer the functions of the Recreation Rivers Advisory Board to the Department of Natural Resources, and to eliminate the board as it is no longer needed Sec. 2, Page 1 Amends AS 41.23.440(a) (relating to management plans for recreation rivers and corridors) to delete the reference to the advisory board. The DNR commissioner would no longer be required to consult with the board when preparing or revising a management plan for each of the six recreation rivers and their corridors. The commissioner and each affected municipality would still be required to consult with public and state agencies Sec. 3, Page 2 Repeals AS 41.23.430 which established the Recreation Rivers Advisory Board Sec. 4, Page 2 Adds a new section to the uncodified law to provide guidelines for the transition period that would be required by this executive order Sec. 5, Page 3 Effective date of July 1, 2024 1:36:03 PM REPRESENTATIVE ARMSTRONG asked Mr. Goodrum to elaborate on inefficiencies, detail the meaning of "performance", and explain how these measures would increase accountability. MR. GOODRUM replied that the department does a vast majority of the board's work already. He cited an inability to meet quorum as contributing to the department's frustration. 1:39:27 PM REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE recalled that the board was reconstituted in 2021. He asked Mr. Goodrum to comment on the "new [management] plan." MR. GOODRUM confirmed that the board was in name only for a number of decades. He said a new or updated version of the management plan would likely be finalized and adopted. 1:41:20 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked what issues would be addressed by the management plan. MR. GOODRUM referred back to slides 2 and 3, which outlined the board's interests and management guidelines. REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether there are other geological groups of rivers similar to the Recreational Rivers Advisory Report on Susitna. MR. GOODRUM responded that to his knowledge, there is not another grouping of recreational rivers within the state containing several different water bodies being managed for special purposes. 1:43:41 PM REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE expressed interest in the management plan proposed by the board, which he characterized as restrictive and catering to special interests. He shared his understanding that the Susitna Basin Rivers would be put in the same category as the boundary waters canoe area with no motorized vehicles and limited camping. He asked how that would best serve Alaskans. MR. GOODRUM declined to speak on behalf of the board. He surmised that in the 1990s, the board may have anticipated the best use of these areas with strong interests in commercial and sport fishing. He reiterated that ultimately, the advisory board puts forth recommendations, adding that the commissioner decides whether to adopt them. REPRESENTATIVE MCCABE reiterated that the plan is significantly more extensive and restrictive to Alaskans' recreational use. He recalled that the governor "was forced" to remove board members in the past and asked whether the board had become too politicized. MR. GOODRUM shared his belief that DNR feels capable of doing the planning on its own. 1:47:22 PM REPRESENTATIVE SADDLER asked whether current laws are sufficient to maintain the health of the wild recreational resources in these rivers. MR. GOODRUM answered yes. [SSCR 11 was held over.]
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
exor0126.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 3 |
exor0132.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
exor0134.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR11 |
exor0124.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 1 |
Sect. Analysis for HB-359.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 359 |
HB-359 PFD Cash Out Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 359 |
EO 126 Wood-Tikchik State Park Management Council DNR Presentation 03.01.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 3 |
2024 Executive Order 134 - Rec Rivers Advisory Board Overview 03.01.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR11 |
EO 132 Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Advisory Council DNR Presentation 03.01.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
EO 132 Supporting Doc - Chilkat Bald Eagle Preserve Management Plan 2.1.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM SRES 2/14/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
EO 132 Testimony - Received as of 2.13.24.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM SRES 2/14/2024 3:30:00 PM |
SSCR 9 |
HB 223 HRES Amendment Packet.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM HRES 3/4/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 223 |
HB 223 Legal Memo on CS.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 223 |
HB 359 Fiscal Note.pdf |
HRES 3/1/2024 1:00:00 PM |
HB 359 |