Legislature(2021 - 2022)BUTROVICH 205
09/08/2021 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR301 | |
| SJR302 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SJR301 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR302 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SJR 301-CONST. AM: APPROP LIMIT
1:33:25 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND announced the consideration of SENATE JOINT
RESOLUTION NO. 301 Proposing amendments to the Constitution of
the State of Alaska relating to an appropriation limit; and
relating to the budget reserve fund.
1:33:43 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND recognized Senator Reinbold's presence.
CHAIR HOLLAND opened public testimony on SJR 301.
1:34:16 PM
QUINN TOWNSEND, Policy Manager, Alaska Policy Forum, Anchorage,
Alaska, read the following written testimony:
Chair Holland and members of the Judiciary Committee,
thank you for the opportunity to testify today. I am
Quinn Townsend testifying on behalf of Alaska Policy
Forum.
Alaska has had a history of high spending during times
of economic growth that has led to fiscal problems
today. One mechanism to reign in the tendency to
increase spending when times are good is through an
appropriation limit, or spending cap. Implementing an
effective spending cap will help stabilize future
state budgets and can encourage private sector growth.
Economic literature shows that a spending cap is
beneficial in curbing the growth of state spending, as
long as it is structured correctly. There are four
main aspects that are integral to a well-
designed cap: how it is enforced, what it limits, how
it limits spending growth, and how it can be
overridden.
1:35:15 PM
MS. TOWNSEND continued:
First, how should a spending cap be enforced? To be
effective, limits need to be constitutional rather
than statutory. Constitutional limits are much more
resilient to the ups and downs of politics than
statutory limits. This means that constitutional
spending caps are more binding than
statutory constraints.
Second, what should a spending cap limit? Ineffective
spending caps allow for workarounds and loopholes,
such as only including appropriations from tax
revenues. Instead, the base of spending limited by the
cap needs to be broad. All state expenditures for a
fiscal year should be covered, not just budgeted
general revenue fund items. This includes fee- and
user charge-based activity.
Third, how does an effective spending cap limit the
growth of state spending? Economic literature has
demonstrated that the most effective spending cap
grows by population and inflation rather than personal
income or another economic measure. However, that
literature also acknowledges that Alaska's economy is
unique and typically excludes the state from national
analyses. Therefore, using a running average of GDP
minus government services to reflect Alaska's private
sector may also be an effective growth rate, even
though it is not a mechanism that other states
typically use.
1:36:42 PM
Fourth, what are the ways to override a spending cap?
An effective spending cap should be extremely
difficult to override and have few exceptions, such as
disasters. To allow spending beyond the limit should
require either a vote of the people, a supermajority
legislative vote, or even both.
Alaska needs an effective limit on state spending.
Every dollar spent by the state is a dollar not being
used by the private sector. Alaska also needs a strong
private sector, especially now as Alaskans are
recovering from the economic effects of the pandemic.
Alaska Policy Forum encourages the implementation of
an effective constitutional appropriation limit.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to testify.
1:38:39 PM
At ease
1:39:00 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND reconvened the meeting.
1:39:18 PM
VIOLET APALAYAK, representing self, Dillingham, Alaska, stated
that late Governor Jay Hammond's wife, Bella, was from the
region. She referred to his book, Diapering the Devil: How
Alaska Helped Staunch Befouling by Mismanaged Oil Wealth: A
Lesson for Other Oil Rich Nations. She offered her support for
issues other than SJR 301. She offered support for restriction
of disposal sites under the Clean Water Act, Section 404 (c),
and requiring Alaska Native cultural courses in Alaska history
curriculum. She recalled that then Governor Hammond suggested
that tax revenue from natural resources be placed in a
conservatively managed account and issuing a new dividend
earnings stock. In closing, she stated support for protecting
the permanent fund into perpetuity.
1:42:17 PM
DON DYER, President, Mat-Su Economic Development Corporation,
Palmer, Alaska, stated support for SJR 301. He offered his
belief that the structure is based on common sense and practical
ways of accomplishing things to provide the right budget
controls in Alaska. It will also help drive economic
development. He emphasized elements, including the five-year
rolling average, which can be adjusted annually but is capped at
14 percent. He stated the spending cap could be a boon for
investment in Alaska because it would provide predictability to
Alaska's budget and it guarantees constitutional budget
controls. He stated support for basing the cap on GDP.
1:44:42 PM
CHAIR HOLLAND closed public testimony on SJR 301.
[SJR 301 was held in committee.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SJR 302 PowerPoint Slides for SJUD.pdf |
SJUD 9/8/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR302 |
| SJR 302 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SJUD 9/8/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR302 |
| SJR 302 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 9/8/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR302 |
| SJR and HJR 301 AML Input.docx |
SJUD 9/8/2021 1:30:00 PM |
HJR301 |
| SJR301 - APF Testimony - 08 Sept 2021.pdf |
SJUD 9/8/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR301 |