Legislature(2001 - 2002)
04/17/2002 09:23 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 43(STA)
Requesting the United States Congress to grant a two-year
moratorium on requirements for certain state payments under
federal programs.
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Kelly complimented Co-Chair Donley for his effort and the
forethought on this "the maintenance of efforts resolution."
AT EASE 9:28 AM / 9:29 AM
Co-Chair Donley moved to adopt CS SJR #43, 22-LS1632\F as a working
draft, and explained that this proposed committee substitute
inserts the language "maintenance of effort" into the title of the
bill for clarification purposes.
Without objection, the committee substitute was ADOPTED as a
working draft.
Co-Chair Donley explained to the Committee this resolution "asks
the federal government to consider a one or two year moratorium on
maintenance efforts requirements so that states can adjust their
spending consistent with current needs and budgetary restraints."
Co-Chair Kelly noted that Co-Chair Donley recently presented this
intent language to an Alaska United States Congressman and received
favorable response. He furthered that this intent language has
never been formally presented at the federal level and would
probably begin debate, as this language would allow "states to
establish a new level of maintenance of efforts" so that they "are
not constantly held" to historical levels of efforts. He continued
this would, in effect, request a moratorium on the maintenance of
effort requirement provisions.
Senator Olson inquired how Senator Donley determined the two-year
time frame presented in this legislation.
Co-Chair Donley replied that 43 states currently have budget
shortfalls. He voiced understanding of the federal government's use
of maintenance of efforts requirements; however the problem is once
the maintenance of efforts requirements are established, they are
permanent. He reasoned that this language would provide the states
"a window of opportunity to readjust their budgets" while keeping
the federal maintenance of efforts program intact. He noted, "the
key to the feds is that you're not taking federal funds and
replacing them with State funds, as they want you to keep moving
toward whatever program they want and that is reasonable." He
contended it would also "be reasonable to allow the states the
freedom to adjust once in a while" based on a multitude of factors.
JIM NORDLUND, Director, Division of Public Assistance, Department
of Health and Social Services, commented that Co-Chair Donley was
"probably motivated" to present this bill because of the Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program that has the largest
maintenance of efforts program, in addition to other block grants
such as the Maternal/Child Health Block grant. He stated the
maintenance effort in effect for the TANF program under the
original program was fifty percent State funded and fifty percent
federally funded; however, when the program transitioned to a block
grant, discussions ensued as to what the states' proper role in
financing the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program
should be. He noted there was concern that states "would de-fund
the program and create what is known as "a Race to the Bottom, to
be the state to have the lowest welfare benefits, and therefore
save state funding in that fashion."
In response to this concern, Mr. Nordlund continued, Congress
established the maintenance of effort regulations mandating states
to be responsible for 80 percent of the block grant funding levels
that were in effect in 1994; therefore, he clarified, 1994 is the
year that maintenance efforts levels are based.
Mr. Nordlund stated "there is some flexibility under the TANF
program that allows the Legislature to realize general funds
savings by using federal TANF dollars to supplant primarily child
care dollars, general funded childcare dollars," in addition to
welfare reform savings. He maintained the Division supports
Congress keeping the maintenance of efforts in place, and no one at
the federal level is considering "getting rid of the maintenance of
efforts."
Co-Chair Kelly asserted, "no one is talking about revising the
maintenance of efforts," and as mentioned, the reaction by Alaska's
Congressman was encouraging.
Co-Chair Kelly stated Co-Chair Donley developed the idea of re-
adjusting it, which was, when first presented, met with opposition.
Co-Chair Kelly stated the idea has grown, and has prompted this
resolution. Co-Chair Kelly stated the discussion on the maintenance
of efforts would continue to grow in the next few years.
Co-Chair Donley asserted, "if ever there was a gap in the
philosophy between the Knowles' Administration and fiscal
discipline, boy, it just emerged." He continued that the
Administration would rather "rely on the federal government to
dictate spending levels" than allow state governments the option to
make their own decisions on their individual budgets, especially in
light of the current state of Alaska's economy.
Co-Chair Donley moved to report "Senate Joint Resolution 43, the
committee substitute, from Committee with individual
recommendations."
There being no objections, CS SJR 43(FIN) was REPORTED from
Committee with a previous zero fiscal note for all departments,
dated 4/03/02, from the Senate State Affairs Committee.
AT EASE 9:40 AM / 9:43 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|