Legislature(2001 - 2002)
02/26/2002 03:37 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SJR 38-CONST AM: PRIORITY OF EXPENDITURES
SENATOR KELLY explained the resolution would require the
administration to submit subsequent budgets with each
department's activities ranked in order of value. Though it is
the Legislature's responsibility to appropriate funds, the
departments are better equipped to evaluate and prioritize their
own activities and production.
The passage of SJR 38 would put this resolution to a vote of the
people and, if approved, would amend the Constitution of the
State of Alaska.
This is similar to the statute that Representative Dyson is
passing through both bodies. He said he is of the opinion that
the statute alone isn't sufficient because of the separation of
powers and the discussion that was held for SJR 37.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT stated that, by law, the governor must submit
the budget to the Legislature by a certain date. He asked whether
the concern is that with Representative Dyson's legislation the
governor would choose to ignore the requirement.
SENATOR KELLY replied that is his concern.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT noted that Section 1 places the existing
language into subsection (a) and subsection (b) is added. He
confirmed that Senator Kelly was anticipating that a statute
would flesh out the particulars if this were enacted. He asked
for an explanation of a prioritized fashion.
SENATOR KELLY replied that the prioritized fashion would be
established by law. The Legislature would decide on some form of
prioritization, then pass that statute and require the governor
to submit it in that form. "Like in the last one, [SJR 37]
governors may veto these statutes, they have that right, but at
some point a governor is not going to veto this and then that
statute is going to sit there almost dormant and then, like in a
resolution form, you could require them to do that on the other
one. On this one, you've got the constitutional authority. … At
some point it is going to require the governor to participate in
this process. Some governor is going to have to pass this statute
and not veto it. It will have the luxury, so to speak, of a
gubernatorial veto whereas the last one we were talking about
didn't because it's enacted by resolution."
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if he envisioned the mechanism would
have to be "turned on" each year or once the Legislature does it
by resolution the governor shall submit the budget with this
detail year after year.
SENATOR KELLY said the form would be determined by the different
Legislatures. He assumes it would be passed just once, but
different Legislatures in different years may choose different
forms and they would have to pass the change by law.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked what action would be taken if a
Legislature no longer wanted the information at all.
SENATOR KELLY said it would be repealed.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT said this Legislature might want this
information, but there will be an election this fall and the
governor is building the budget during the election process. He
asked whether he puts the prioritized document together for the
next Legislature.
SENATOR KELLY replied he envisions it the same way that the
budget is created every year. There would just be a rider added
requiring prioritization.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT asked if this would be the budget document
itself or a separate document.
SENATOR KELLY said the budget document would have the rider.
There was no further testimony.
CHAIRMAN THERRIAULT stated there was no proposed committee
substitute and no proposed amendments. The attached fiscal note
for $1,500 is standard for anything that will be placed on the
ballot.
He asked for the will of the committee.
SENATOR PHILLIPS made a motion to move SJR 38 and attached fiscal
note from committee with individual recommendations.
There being no objection, SJR 38 moved from committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|