Legislature(2001 - 2002)
03/22/2002 09:38 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 38
Proposing amendments to the Constitution of the State of
Alaska relating to information regarding proposed
expenditures.
This was the first hearing for this resolution in the Senate
Finance Committee.
Co-Chair Kelly noted this constitutional amendment allows the
previous bill, HB 349, to be implemented.
Representative Dyson relayed his experiences serving on the
Anchorage Assembly where a similar prioritization process is in
use. He noted this process was never codified in law, but is
nonetheless effective and had been "greatly refined".
Representative Dyson shared discussions on this legislation with
Annalee McConnell, former leader of the budget department in the
Municipality of Anchorage and current director of the state's
Office of Management and Budget. He noted they talked about the
process employed in the Municipality, whereby the budget analysts
were required to calculate the "exact cost of every component of
every output of every department." He relayed Ms. McConnell's
concerns that these efforts were wasted for those programs that
were of either very high priority, and would not be eliminated, or
low priority and would not receive funding. He countered there is a
benefit for the legislative body to know the cost of all operations
regardless of whether those functions were considered for
reductions.
Senator Ward asked how the items in the Municipality of Anchorage
budget are prioritized.
Representative Dyson replied that the services and outputs are
ranked from most valuable to least valuable by the departments.
Senator Olson asked about transferring this method from a single
municipality to the state, which has more complexity.
Representative Dyson replied this principal is universal, is
practiced by individuals and businesses, and is therefore
reasonable to expect of the state.
Representative Dyson noted the municipality system identifies those
expenditures that are statutory required, those that are
constitutionally mandated, and those that are supported by user
fees. He suggested the state employ this method as well. These
functions, he stressed, would become higher priorities. He stressed
his intention is not to "take a sledgehammer or meat cleaver
approach" but rather one that is thoughtful and rational.
Senator Austerman asked what timeframe would be provided to the
Administration to allow this prioritization process to be
undertaken within the normal budget cycle.
Co-Chair Kelly responded this constitutional amendment only allows
the Legislature the authority to require the Administration to
perform prioritization. He stated that statutes would be the
appropriate venue to provide for an implementation timeframe. He
anticipated statutory changes would be necessary to "refine the
process".
Senator Green offered a motion to report SJR 38 from Committee with
a $1,500 fiscal note from the Office of the Governor, Division of
Elections.
The bill MOVED from Committee without objection.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|