Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/06/2004 03:40 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SJR 30-AMEND & FUND NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT
CHAIR GARY STEVENS announced SJR 30 to be up for consideration.
DANA OWEN, staff to Senator Johnny Ellis, sponsor, explained
that SJR 30 asks Congress to revisit the No Child Left Behind
Act. He read the following sponsor statement:
School districts across Alaska and the nation are
increasingly discovering that the federal No Child
Left Behind Act of 2001, the most far reaching
intrusion of federal control into education in the
nation's history, imposes mandates that are awkward at
best and counterproductive at worst. Moreover, these
federal mandates are under funded, further burdening
already strained budgets.
Much of the problem lies in the act's one-size-fits-
all approach. Policies that may appear workable from
the vantage of Washington, D.C., turn out to be
obstacles to success in practice. For example, under
the act many excellent teachers would be prevented
from teaching subjects they fully understand. An
advanced degree in economics or physics would not
qualify a teacher to teach basic mathematics,
presenting a serious problem in small Alaska schools
where a single person typically teaches all sciences
and math.
Schools are also required to demonstrate adequate
yearly progress as defined by the act, not just for
the majority of students, but for each subgroup
defined in the act. Under this provision, many very
successful schools can find themselves labeled as
failing. Each year of failure brings increasingly
harsh sanctions that would significantly drive up
costs for school districts.
Passage of SJR 30 would add Alaska's voice to those
nationwide that are speaking out about problems with
the No Child Left Behind Act. States as diverse as
Arizona, Vermont, Hawaii, Virginia and Utah have seen
legislative efforts protesting the burdens placed on
them by the act. Some states and school districts are
even considering opting out of federal oversight
altogether. While such a drastic step would mean
losing federal education grants and perhaps other
monies, these states and school districts believe that
the cost of complying with the act would be greater
than the federal dollars they receive.
SJR 30 recognizes that Alaska had taken strong steps
to improve school performance even before passage of
the federal law and asks that Congress give states
more flexibility and greater financial support in
meeting the act's mandates.
SENATOR STEDMAN referred to page 2, line 25 and asked which
changes they'd like to see Congress make.
MR. OWEN noted that there are a number of suggested changes in
the packets, but they aren't endorsing any specific changes
because they recognize that the complaints regarding the act are
so strong and diverse that it would be a huge effort for the
Alaska Legislature to outline specific changes. It's better to
send the legislation back to the drafters. It was a strong
bipartisan Congressional effort that produced the bill and the
original authors are best suited to address changes.
Many states have outlined suggestions and the sponsor statement
highlighted a very few.
SENATOR STEDMAN asked for confirmation that the resolution would
go unattached in that case.
MR. OWEN said that's correct.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS remarked that it's problematic in small
communities where teachers teach multiple subjects even though
they don't have advanced degrees in those subjects and may not
meet the requirements. The fact that they may be very fine
teachers wouldn't be taken into account.
MR. OWEN agreed that is one of the main failures of the act. The
sciences are an excellent example. Someone may have an advanced
degree in physics or economics but they wouldn't be qualified to
teach mathematics. That's a huge burden in small schools, he
said.
CHAIR GARY STEVENS repeated that this is a problem and a good
reason to ask for relief. He asked for the pleasure of the
committee.
SENATOR STEDMAN motioned to move SJR 30 from committee with the
attached fiscal note and individual recommendations. There being
no objection, it was so ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|