Legislature(2015 - 2016)BUTROVICH 205
04/15/2015 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HJR24 | |
| SJR18 | |
| SB50 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 50 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 137 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HJR 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR 18 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SJR 18-SUPPORT SHELL PORT OF SEATTLE LEASE
3:41:37 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced consideration of SJR 18.
KARI NORE, staff to Senator Giessel, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, explained SJR 18 for the sponsor. She said this
resolution supports the Royal Dutch Shell Port of Seattle
leases. It also urges the State of Washington to stop
interfering with Alaska's economic development, especially when
it comes to developing the oil and gas deposits in the Beaufort
and Chuckchi Seas and the Alaska Arctic.
She said this resolution also offers Seward and/or Dutch Harbor
as possible ports for Royal Dutch Shell in the event that
Seattle and the State of Washington move forward with the
termination of their current leases.
SENATOR STEDMAN said Shell had been looking at several ports and
that Dutch Harbor and Seward are far from the supply chain. He
was wondering why those were picked from the whole gamut of
choices they have in Alaska.
CHAIR GIESSEL replied that Dutch Harbor is an actual location
where Shell has harbored their vessels before and they have some
facilities set up for them there; Seward is in the process of
developing a harbor. Ketchikan is an option and she wasn't sure
that Whittier could accommodate the drilling vessels.
SENATOR STEDMAN said Sitka has a dock facility that is capable
of accommodating Panamax-sized ships. It appears that no one
port will have the capacity to facilitate offshore and that
Alaska will end up with multiple ports. Seattle is being
extremely rude and Alaska would like to get Shell's business.
SENATOR STOLTZE said Seward has a rich history in the
development of Alaska and asked if they had received support
from the City of Seward for economic development because of the
National Park issue and politics involved in Seward. He asked if
they had received any support from the City of Seward for
economic development and bringing something as evil as fossil
fuels into its port.
CHAIR GIESSEL responded, as the immediate past senator for
Seward, that Seward was the home port for at least one of
Shell's vessels and is quite open to development. An industrial
harbor is being developed across the bay from the city.
3:46:40 PM
SENATOR STEDMAN moved conceptual Amendment 1 to add "has
available potential home ports at Dutch Harbor, Seward,
Ketchikan, Sitka, and anywhere in Prince William Sound" on page
3, line 13, to leave the all the options open for companies.
There were no objections and conceptual Amendment 1 was adopted.
3:47:42 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL opened public testimony on SJR 18.
REED CHRISTENSEN, Board Member, Alaska Support Industry
Alliance, Anchorage, Alaska, strongly supported SJR 18. He is
also the President of Dowland-Bach Corporation. He said the
Alaska business climate is like the weather: if you like it or
not, just wait five minutes because it will change. This rugged
environment and remoteness is part of the natural challenges of
doing business in Alaska, but most people don't realize it or
our resiliency and capacity to rise to them.
However, the recent stance by neighbors in Washington State and
others are much worse than the flooding of the Dalton Highway.
The Alliance strongly supports this resolution and echoes
remarks made by Mayor Brower of the North Slope in her open
letter to Lieutenant Governor Hensley that says statements from
current leadership in Washington State and Seattle "reflect a
lack of basic knowledge about our region and are offensive to
people who live in America's Arctic."
3:51:23 PM
SARAH ERKMANN, Manager, External Affairs, Alaska Oil and Gas
Association (AOGA), Anchorage, Alaska, supported SJR 18. She
said the Arctic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) holds enormous oil
and gas resources, approximately 27 billion barrels of oil and
132 tcf of natural gas. In comparison, the Trans Alaska Pipeline
System (TAPS) has carried just more than 17 billion barrels in
over 30 years. At one point, it carried more than 2 million
barrels of oil a day, but now it transports an average of
550,000 barrels a day. TAPS has played a critical link in the
nation's energy security and OCS development in the Beaufort and
Chukchi Seas could feed into TAPs and maintain its viability for
years to come.
Additionally, oil and gas development in the Arctic OCS means
jobs for Alaskans. Development of the Chuckchi and Beaufort Seas
is predicted to produce an annual average of 35,000 direct and
indirect jobs over the next half century for Alaska, alone.
Those jobs represent a total payroll of more than $70 billion.
When it comes to the Pacific Northwest, Shell's decision to
stage its Arctic operation in Seattle in 2012 poured hundreds of
millions of dollars into the Seattle economy and employed more
than 400 people. Seattle stands to benefit from similar economic
benefits in 2015. On a broader scale, the State of Washington
and City of Seattle benefit from the development of Alaska's
resources via 113,000 jobs for Washington residents and annual
business sales to the state of $5 billion.
3:54:11 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL finding no further comments on SJR 18, closed
public testimony.
SENATOR STEDMAN commented that Washington State might do a
refined products tax on exports next year, and maybe Alaska
might have a difference of opinion on that. So, it goes beyond
just what they are doing with Shell.
3:55:04 PM
SENATOR MICCICHE said he appreciated SJR 18 very much. The point
is not lost of the hypocrisy of some communities; it seems like
the more btus they use per capita the more they are against oil
and gas development. He suggested encouraging developers of
waters off of Alaska to start a little earlier on to keep their
investments in the state. The more that occurs, the more our
infrastructure will be capable of servicing those vessels and
assets.
SENATOR COGHILL remarked that one of the things that gets lost
by many people who live in Seattle is that Alaska is trying to
build an infrastructure for power here. They have lived for
almost a century with hydro projects put together by the federal
government and run by the Army Corps of Engineers that has given
them 4-cent power that they lean on, and they are quite often
accusing Alaskans of leaning on the federal government. Boeing
would not have moved to Seattle if it hadn't been for low cost
power that was created a century ago.
SENATOR STEDMAN added that it goes beyond the western side of
the State of Washington; "it goes into the eastern side when you
look at damming of rivers for hydro-generation and the farm belt
that sprang up once they had the ability to water the desert."
In the event legislators ever go down that road and mention it
formally to their legislature, he would like to use a broader
brush and remind them of development on both sides of the
mountains.
SENATOR COSTELLO moved to report SJR 18, as amended, from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s). There were no objections and CSSJR 18(RES) was reported
from the Senate Resources Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HJR024A.PDF |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 Sponsor statement.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR24 Fiscal Note-.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 2008 ltr.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 BLM Cover sheet.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 chapter_1.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJr 24 chapter_2.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 chapter_3.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJr 24 chapter_4.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJr 24 DNR Land sheet.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 H. floor vote.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJr 24 map.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 Res Vote.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| HJR 24 sec207_akd1withdrawls.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 24 |
| SJR 18 Version W.PDF |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Fiscal Note.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Seattle City Council.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Seattle Chamber Study.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 North Slope Borough Letter.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Gov. Inslee Letter.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SJR 18 Export-Import Bank Articles.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 18 |
| SB50- Proposed CS- Version E.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |
| SB50- Explanation of Changes- Version W to Version E.pdf |
SRES 4/15/2015 3:30:00 PM |
SB 50 |