Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/01/1995 09:05 AM Senate HES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SHES - 3/1/95
SJR 17 NAT'L ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES
Number 435
CHAIRMAN GREEN called the committee back to order at 9:40 a.m. and
introduced SJR 17 as the last order of business before the
committee.
SENATOR RIEGER, prime sponsor, stated that SJR 17 addressed the
National Endowment for the Humanities which is under federal
consideration for reauthorization. He noted that the National
Endowment for the Humanities is a far-reaching organization in
Alaska. He supported budget reductions at the federal level, but
all aspects of federal spending should be reviewed. SJR 17 does
not request a hold harmless for this endowment, but it would
request a fair and equitable solution. He encouraged the committee
to review the backup of SJR 17, a lot of benefits have been
achieved with little money.
CHAIRMAN GREEN asked if there were other questions.
SENATOR LEMAN agreed that the National Endowment for the Humanities
has achieved many beneficial programs. However, should the general
public be forced to contribute to these programs through taxation?
He reiterated that there are benefits gained, but he objected in
principle to this non-core governmental function. Obtaining
private donations or other funding mechanisms in order to end
federal funding and control would seem more appropriate.
SENATOR MILLER stated that he shared some of the concerns of
Senator Leman. He asked at what point should the government be
involved in the arts and when should private donations come into
play. Government funding carries government control. He did not
want censorship; do not require that everyone fund these programs
some of which are felt to be objectional to some people, use your
own funding. The vast majority of the programs in the Alaska
Humanities are good programs, however, programs regarding political
issues do not seem appropriate. Perhaps, the funding of political
programs should be obtained elsewhere. In conclusion, this
legislation seems to be a philosophical debate.
Number 499
SENATOR RIEGER acknowledged that he had given that point some
thought, but throughout history most great cultures have devoted a
portion of their national resources to the arts and humanities. In
a historical context, the amount of funding of this would be
considered low in comparison to previous cultures.
CHAIRMAN GREEN moved that SJR 17 be moved out of committee with
individual recommendations. SENATOR LEMAN objected to the funding
mechanism.
Upon a roll call vote, Senators Green, Ellis, and Salo voted "Yeah"
and Senators Leman and Miller voted "Nay." The motion passed and
SJR 17 was passed out of committee with individual recommendations.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|