Legislature(2011 - 2012)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/17/2012 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB195 | |
| SB110 | |
| SJR13 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 110 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 195 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR 13 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SJR 13-AMEND U.S. CONST RE CAMPAIGN MONEY
2:43:31 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SJR 13.
SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, sponsor of SJR 13, introduced the
resolution speaking to the following sponsor statement:
Many Americans recognize that the ability of large
contributions from corporations, wealthy individuals
and organizations to political candidates harms the
ability of citizens to have a voice in their own
government. Prior to the landmark United States
Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. Federal
Election Commission, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010), unlimited
independent expenditures from corporations and unions
was prohibited. Now, corporations and unions can make
unlimited independent expenditures supporting or
opposing a candidate for public office. This directly
goes against the American idea of one person one vote,
when one corporation can spend more than thousands.
This decision only made the cynicism most Americans
feel about politics stronger. If people feel as if
their vote does not matter, then voter participation
will continue to decline.
The massive amount of money in politics following this
decision is exploding the expense of campaigns, making
it difficult for new or unknown candidates to enter a
race. More and more, the money spent by corporations
and unions is going to negative attack ads that often
misinform voters rather than promote productive
discussion. Allowing unlimited campaign donations by
corporations and unions takes the focus for candidates
away from individual voters to those whose money can
afford to sway hundreds of votes.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said there are only two ways to fix this
problem. Either the Supreme Court reverses itself or Congress
amends the U.S. Constitution. The first option is unlikely at
this point. Thus, SJR 13 urges Congress and the President to
work to amend the constitution to prohibit corporations, wealthy
individuals and unions from making unlimited independent
expenditures in elections.
CHAIR FRENCH stated that he couldn't agree more.
2:46:14 PM
CHRISTINA MOUNCE, representing the Juneau chapter of Move to
Amend, explained that the mission of this nationwide
organization was to amend the U.S. Constitution to limit the
amount that corporations can spend in elections. After the
Citizens United decision nearly $4 billion was spent during the
2010 congressional election, and according to the Center for
Responsive Politics, 85 percent of House seats and 83 percent of
Senate seats went to the candidate that spent the most money in
that election cycle. She said the playing field is no longer
level but in passing the resolution Alaska would be asserting
itself in support of fair campaigns and representation of
average Americans. She submitted a letter that was signed by 10
Juneau residents who were unable to attend the hearing but
supported SJR 13.
2:48:27 PM
LARRY HURLOCK, representing himself, said he was testifying to
highlight the harm that the Citizens United decision had done to
investors. He spoke of his expectations as a shareholder and his
fear of large bureaucracies hiding expenditures from
shareholders. Archer Daniel Midland (ADM), for example, reports
aggregated amounts for campaign contributions. The political
activism is hidden in plain view, he stated. Although ADM says
information about its spending is publicly available,
shareholders do not get an itemized accounting. He concluded by
stating support for SJR 13.
2:52:01 PM
ROBERT BUSCH, representing himself, stated that the Citizens
United opinion gave corporate personhood the green light to use
money as speech. Corporations now have the ability to spend
unlimited amounts of money to influence local, state, and
federal elections. According to Stephen Wayne, author of "The
Road to the White House 2012," 94 percent of candidates with the
most money were elected to Congress. The decision expanded the
divide between rich and poor by adding weight to the political
influence that overwhelmingly favors corporations. It will make
it increasingly difficult for the middle class to maintain
housing, get jobs, and deal with debt. He concluded by stating
that SJR 13 was a good vehicle to inform the public and those in
Washington D.C.
2:55:05 PM
KATE VEH, representing herself, Kenai, AK, stated emphatic
support for SJR 13. She asserted that her voice was being
drowned out by corporations, unions, and enormously wealthy
individuals who were donating vast amounts of money to
politicians. She maintained that this was corruption. As a proud
American she said she wanted three things: political leaders who
listen, political leaders who can manage money without relying
on global corporations, and a government that Americans can be
proud of.
SCOTT SHAW, representing himself, Soldotna, AK, stated support
for SJR 13. "We all believe corporations and unions are not
people and money is not speech." This notion has huge grassroots
support, he stated.
PATRICK COYAVISTO, representing himself, Kenai, AK, stated
support for SJR 13. He agreed with a recent statement by
Representative Les Gara that politicians should be elected on
their ideas, not the size of their own or their supporters'
pocketbooks. He maintained that more people would participate in
politics if corporations weren't so heavily involved.
3:00:18 PM
MARK HAYES, campaign coordinator, Public Citizens Democracy is
for People, said this organization is working to build public
support for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens
United decision and challenge corporate power in this democracy.
Taking the step to amend the constitution is timely, relevant
and impactful. Independent expenditures by special interests
have skyrocketed since the Supreme Court ruling, so it is
timely. It is taking away the state's ability to regulate
campaign spending, so it is relevant. With regard to impact, he
said that taking action on this resolution is a way to show
concrete political support at the state level for a
constitutional amendment. Congress is starting to move in this
direction, but without state support it won't go anywhere.
CHAIR FRENCH closed public testimony on SJR 13.
3:04:24 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report SJR 13 from committee with
individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s).
CHAIR FRENCH announced that without objection, SJR 13 moved from
the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 195.PDF |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 195 |
| SB 195-Sponsor statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 195 |
| SB 195 backup NCSL.PDF |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 195 |
| SB 195 backup -ADN articles.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 195 |
| SB 195 letter of support.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 195 |
| SJR 13 Ver.M.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR13 Sponsor statement.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR13 ADN Editorial.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SJR13 Center for Responsive Politics article.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 13 |
| SB110 Version M (1).pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 110 |
| SB110.APOA Letter of Support.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 110 |
| SB110.Support Ltr.Violent Crimes Compensation Board.pdf |
SJUD 2/17/2012 1:30:00 PM |
SB 110 |