Legislature(2021 - 2022)BARNES 124
03/23/2021 01:30 PM House TRANSPORTATION
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s): Board of Marine Pilots | |
| SJR9 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| + | SJR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SJR 9-URGE EXEMPTION FOR CRUISE SHIPS
1:49:40 PM
CO-CHAIR HOPKINS announced that the final order of business
would be CS FOR SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 9(L&C), Urging the
United States Congress to exempt cruise ships from certain
provisions of the PVSA and other applicable provisions of
federal law for the period during which Canadian ports are
closed to cruise ships carrying more than 100 people; and urging
the President of the United States not to fine or take actions
against cruise ships sailing to the state.
1:49:51 PM
SENATOR JESSE KIEHL, Senator, Alaska State Legislature, shared
in 2019 Alaska had 2.2m tourists, most of whom came in on big
ships. The tourists were responsible for about $4B in economic
activity across Alaska, he shared. In 2020 the number was close
to zero, he shared, putting small- and medium-sized Alaska
businesses and their employees at great risk. There were
federal payroll protection programs, disaster loans, Alaska
CARES Act money, and unemployment assistance; yet, if the 2021
numbers looked similar, there would be very few businesses which
would survive.
SENATOR KIEHL stated in 2021 with the Canadian closure, a series
of American federal laws were positioned to prevent another
cruise ship season. In effect, with big ships' obligatory stops
in Canada on their way to Alaska canceled, SJR 9 would ask for
temporary reprieve during the pandemic and closed Canadian
waters. He noted SJR 9 had been developed with the
Congressional delegation; that all three members had introduced
legislation that would do what SJR 9 requested. If SJR 9 did
not pass, it would ensure prohibitive laws did not pass. It did
not ask for any breaks or shortcuts on COVID-19 safety, he
pointed out. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) put out a 40-
page manual for COVID-19 mitigations should sailing again become
safe. There were safe ways for cruising to resume, he added.
1:55:14 PM
CO-CHAIR HOPKINS thanked the sponsor for bringing forth the
statewide issue.
1:55:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked about the similarity between SJR 9
and House Bill 13.
SENATOR KIEHL said the only change was some clarifying language
in the second resolved clause to clarify no enforcement would be
taken against ships under the Passenger Vessel Services Act
(PVSA).
1:56:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK asked when Congress would "deal with this,"
and if getting ships to Juneau in the summer of 2021 were a
possibility.
SENATOR KIEHL said he could not predict Congress. At one time
he thought the provisions could have been inserted into the
American Rescue Act because it was done through the budget
reconciliation process and was not an order, he shared.
Congressman Don Young originally introduced legislation on the
matter, he stated, and shared he thought the solution "elegant."
There are a couple potential vehicles in which to insert this
resolution, he said. There was no date, he said. The cruise
lines needed to make decisions; the CDC was still in partial
shutdown mode; and it would take 90 days "from the word go" to
get paying passengers on board, so there was very little chance
before mid- or late-July.
REPRESENTATIVE CRONK said he supported SJR 9.
1:59:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE DRUMMOND asked if other states impacted had asked
for similar dispensation; for example, Washington, where many of
the cruise ships originated.
SENATOR KIEHL said he had been working with the Washington State
delegation and several members of their legislature, but there
had been no resolution from Washington. There were several
issues, and the Port of Seattle would see significant impacts if
the big ships didn't begin any voyages there this summer, he
added.
2:00:31 PM
CO-CHAIR HOPKINS opened public testimony.
2:00:45 PM
ANDREW CREMATA, Mayor of Skagway, testified in support of SJR 9.
Mr. Cremata said the PVSA presented a "significant hurdle" to
cruises resuming their ability to pay visits to Skagway and
described the dire situation in that community due to the
pandemic and subsequent loss of cruise ship revenue income to
the tune of $160m in 2020. The loss of the 2021 cruise season
would mean 2.5 years in the best-case scenario. Has sent letter
of support of SJR 9 to federal delegation and spoken with
legislators, he stated. He has also encouraged independent
traffic, but the border is closed for many of the same reasons
Canada's were, he said. Other port communities were affected,
as is Denali Borough, he imparted.
2:03:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN asked about the total revenue loss
compared to total of $160m in 2020.
MR. CREMATA responded it was almost an entire year's income and
that property taxes even had to be waived for businesses that
couldn't afford to pay. Going into 2021 budget cycle with 6%
revenue projected, which is optimistic. There was still sales
tax revenue, but the significance of the impact wasn't shown, he
said. It was 96% - 98% percent of revenue, he shared.
2:04:32 PM
CO-CHAIR HOPKINS asked if Skagway had a similar problem with
allocations based on population like Denali.
MR. CREMATA responded CARES Act money was put back into the
hands of residents and created a grant program for businesses
out of sales tax. He emphasized SJR 9 was a matter of survival
for the community of Skagway.
2:06:27 PM
CO-CHAIR HOPKINS closed public testimony on SJR 9.
2:06:40 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HANNAN moved to report SJR 9 out of committee
with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal
notes. There being no objection, SJR 9 moved out of the House
Transportation Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| HTRA Confirmation Hearing - Board of Marine Pilots - Lucas Hasenbank 3.23.2021.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
Confirmation Hearing |
| HTRA Confirmation Hearing - Board of Marine Pilots - Richard Harris 3.23.2021.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
Confirmation Hearing |
| SJR 9 Letters of Support 2021-03-15.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 Explanation of Changes.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 Letters of Opposition 2021-03-15.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 Supporting Document KTOO Article on Federal Legislation.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 ver. B.PDF |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 Zero Fiscal Note.PDF |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |
| SJR 9 Letter of Support Fairbanks Chamber 3.23.2021.pdf |
HTRA 3/23/2021 1:30:00 PM |
SJR 9 |