Legislature(2025 - 2026)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/25/2025 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB43 | |
| SB40 | |
| SJR6 | |
| SJR10 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 43 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 40 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR 10 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SJR 6-WASHINGTON D.C. STATEHOOD
3:48:16 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI announced the consideration of SENATE JOINT
RESOLUTION NO. 6 Supporting the admittance of Washington, D.C.,
into the Union as a state of the United States of America.
3:48:57 PM
MAGGIE GRENIER, Staff, Senator Loki Tobin, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, co-introduced SJR 6 on behalf of
the sponsor as follows:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Senate Joint Resolution 6 seeks to put the Alaska
State Legislature on record supporting admitting
Washington, D.C. as a new state.
• Specifically, SJR 6 calls on the President and
Congress to enact legislation granting statehood
to the people of Washington, D.C.
• The goal is for that legislation to shrink the
size of the current federal District of Columbia
to only include federal lands and buildings.
• That would include the main symbols of our shared
democracy, including the White House, the Capital
Building, the Supreme Court, and the National
Mall.
• The new state that is envisioned by SJR 6 would
include the residential areas of Washington, D.C.
that includes a population of around 712,000.
The current situation by the residents of Washington,
D.C. is similar to the situation faced by the people
of Alaska prior to statehood.
• To highlight this similarity, I would like to
read a quote from a letter of support in your
packet from the League of Women Voters of Alaska.
• From 1884 to 1912 Alaska was organized as the
District of Alaska.
"Because Alaska's own campaign for statehood is
relatively recent, and we still have citizens who
remember our territorial status before 1959, when we
had federal rule and no voting representation in
Congress, it seems appropriate that Alaskans and the
Alaska State Legislature should speak up in support of
statehood for the citizens of the District of
Columbia, who pay federal income taxes and serve in
the US military without full representation in
Congress." Excerpt from a letter of support from the
League of Women Voters Alaska
3:51:02 PM
MIKE MASON, Staff, Senator Loki Tobin, Alaska State Legislature,
Juneau, Alaska, co-introduced SJR 6 on behalf of the sponsor as
follows:
[Original punctuation provided.]
The District of Columbia Elections Act that was
approved by Congress in 1970 gave the Washington, D.C.
area to send a delegate to the House of
Representatives.
• The delegate can participate in debates but
cannot vote.
• Additionally, the Washington, D.C. area is not
represented in the U.S. Senate.
MR. MASON stated that the District of Columbia is currently
represented by an elected 13-member council and elected mayor,
with limited powers of local self-government granted in 1973 to
ease the burden on Congress. He said Congress and the President
have frequently interfered with D.C.'s self-government by
disapproving, amending, or repealing actions taken by the local
council and mayor. He stated that on multiple occasions, a
majority of Washington D.C. voters have expressed support for
statehood through initiatives and referrals.
The U.S. Government is facing a lot of challenges and
there is little attention paid to the needs and the
rights of the residents of Washington, D. C.
• Statehood would give those residents the right of
self-determination that is currently lacking
under exclusive federal control.
3:54:54 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI [opened public testimony on SJR 6.]
3:55:07 PM
SUE SHERIF, Board Member, League of Women Voters of Alaska,
Fairbanks, Alaska, testified in support of SJR 6. She offered
the following testimony:
[Original punctuation provided.]
Although Washington, DC is a large city by Alaska
standards, the population of the District itself is
only 689.5 thousand people, which would place it as a
state between Alaska and Vermont amongst the five
smallest states. It would join the seven states--
Alaska, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota,
Vermont, and Delaware that have only one delegate in
the House of Representatives. (The district currently
has a non-voting representative in the House who can
draft legislation but cannot vote.)
The League is nonpartisan and does not support or
oppose candidates or parties, but it does take
positions on issues after reaching a consensus based
on careful study. The League of Women Voters US
position states: "The League of Women Voters of the
United States believes that citizens of the District
of Columbia should be afforded the same rights of
self-government and full voting representation in
Congress as are all other citizens of the United
States."
3:58:33 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI stated that the District of Columbia would be the
smallest state geographically and asked how the state would
generate revenue to function.
3:58:48 PM
MR. MASON answered that the residents of Washington D.C. pay
more in federal taxes per capita than any other state. He said
Washington D.C has a strong tax base. He stated that Washington
D.C. is a major metropolitan area with a large population of
visitors, which supports the idea that Washington D.C. would
generate enough revenue to sustain itself as a state.
3:59:27 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI asked if Washington D.C. were to become the 51st
state would there be concerns about the imbalance in the United
States Senate.
3:59:45 PM
MR. MASON responded that expanding the number of members in
Congress and the Senate is a significant policy decision. He
stated there are a lot of good arguments how more representation
is beneficial, especially for underrepresented populations. He
stated that Washington D.C. currently has a larger population
than Wyoming and Vermont.
4:00:28 PM
SENATOR GRAY-JACKSON asked how many states have sent resolutions
supporting Washington D.C.'s statehood.
4:00:43 PM
MR. MASON answered that over the past few years, around 100
resolutions have been filed, with approximately 35 states
involved. He emphasized that no other democracy denies the
people of its national capital the right to vote in its national
legislature. He stated that 700,000 residents of Washington D.C.
currently lack a vote in Congress, which is unique among major
democracies.
4:01:36 PM
SENATOR YUNDT asked whether the country has a plan for
establishing a new seat of government if Washington, D.C. were
to become its own state.
4:01:51 PM
MR. MASON answered that the seat of government would stay where
it is, the District of Columbia would be reduced to include only
federal infrastructure, while the new state would encompass the
residential areas currently part of Washington D.C.
SENATOR YUNDT stated his concern that it would defeat the
purpose of why Washington D.C. was set up in the first place.
MR. MASON stated that there have been concerns to enact the
statehood for Washington D.C., the United States would have to
have a constitutional amendment because of the 23rd Amendment.
He said legal experts suggest that while a federal district
can't be enlarged, it can be shrunk. He said the District of
Columbia has been reduced before, so the district would be
resized to include only federal infrastructure, while the new
state would cover the residential areas, giving representation
to those currently unrepresented.
4:03:56 PM
CHAIR KAWASAKI held SJR 6 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SJR 6.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 Research ND Similar Resolution 1.30.25.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 Research NC Similar Resolution 1.30.25.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 Research MD Similar Resolution 1.30.25.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 D.C. Statehood Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR6 Letter of Support Signed2-23-25(2).pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SB 40 Version N.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Sponsor Statement version N.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 40 |
| SB 40 Sectional Analysis version N.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 40 |
| Fiscal.Note.SB 40.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 40 |
| SJR010A.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 10 |
| AWA SB Support.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
|
| SJR6-LEG-SESS-02-24-2025.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| Hmong Veterans Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
|
| Hmong Resolution Presentation.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
|
| SB 40 Testimony- received as of 02.24.2025-compressed (1).pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 40 |
| SJR10-LEG-SESS-02-24-2025.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 10 |
| SJR 6 letter of Support2.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 Letter of support 3.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR6 letter of support.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 10 letters of support.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 10 |
| SB 40 letter of support.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 40 |
| SB 43 Letter of Support - Congresswoman Mary Peltola.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SB 43 |
| SJR 6 Letter of support 4.pdf |
SSTA 2/25/2025 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 6 |