Legislature(2003 - 2004)
02/11/2003 03:30 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SJR 6-CONST AM: 90 DAY LEGISLATIVE SESSION
SENATOR GRETCHEN GUESS, bill sponsor, explained the resolution
would place a constitutional amendment on the ballot to change
the current 120-day legislative session to a 90-day legislative
session. She opined legislators could accomplish their work in
that time frame and save the state $888 thousand a year.
CHAIR TAYLOR called for questions.
SENATOR COWDERY asked whether she would support elimination of
the five-day notification rule.
SENATOR GUESS said she would give it some thought.
CHAIR TAYLOR said the issue needs periodic debate. Legislators
haven't received a salary increase for 16 years and perhaps
reducing the length of the session would allow more people to
participate in the legislative process.
He thought the work could be accomplished in a shortened time
frame, but he couldn't say whether it would result in better
legislation for the people of Alaska.
SENATOR COWDERY noted he has been as busy in the interim as he
is during the 120-day session.
CHAIR TAYLOR said legislative leaders always have demands upon
their time and are busy year round. The questions of how they go
about doing business and whether more or less should be done in
the interim are policy calls that are deserving of review.
SENATOR DYSON identified with the Chair's ambiguous feelings and
expressed a desire to hear additional testimony before passing
the bill to the next committee. He wanted to hear about any
impacts experienced by other states after shortening their
legislative sessions. He also wanted to hear from political
scientists because he could argue that shortening session length
could change the balance of power vis-à-vis the administration.
In addition it might rob power from a minority that uses
deadlines to force the majority into accommodations.
He asked what the other committees of referral were and where
the Chair expected the continued debate to occur.
CHAIR TAYLOR replied the next committee is Judiciary and then
the bill would be referred to Finance because a fiscal note
would be attached to put the issue on the ballot.
He anticipates the major debate would occur in the Judiciary
Committee. The Senate President is seated there and he hopes
they would take the time to discuss the bill. Moving bills
stimulates interest in a debate.
SENATOR DYSON said that would be fine, but because it is a bill
dealing with a fundamental role of a branch of government, he
thought State Affairs is the committee where substantive debate
on the philosophical and policy issues should occur.
SENATOR GUESS made a commitment to Senator Dyson to begin
collecting information on lessons learned from other states as
well as from the academic community.
CHAIR TAYLOR had no objection to holding additional hearings in
the State Affairs Committee, but he contends movement from one
committee to another serves to stimulate interest and
discussion.
He said he would entertain a motion to move the bill, but none
was forthcoming.
SENATOR DYSON assured members his questions were not meant to
kill the bill and he looked forward to hearing enlightened and
expert opinion on the matter.
CHAIR TAYLOR held SJR 6 in committee and announced the bill
would be heard in two weeks.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|