Legislature(2005 - 2006)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/16/2005 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR6 | |
| SB98 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SJR 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 97 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 98 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 6
Relating to a reduction in the Federal Medical Assistance
Percentage for Alaskans, and urging the United States Congress
to take action to prevent the reduction.
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Wilken stated this resolution, "addresses a proposed
reduction to the federal share of Alaska's Medicaid program. If the
announced reduction takes place as scheduled on October first of
2005, the estimated loss to the State in FY 06 is approximately $53
million. This resolution encourages that decision to not take
place."
9:06:26 AM
JOEL GILBERTSON, Commissioner, Department of Health and Social
Services, testified that this resolution addresses the fact that
the federal match rate for the Medicaid program is due for a
"sizable reduction" as of October 2005. The Medicaid match rate,
also referred to as FMAP, Federal Medical Assistance Percentage,
for each state is calculated based on the per-capital income of
that state with wealthier states required to contribute a larger
portion to its Medicaid costs. A limit of 50 percent was
established. For several years, this rate applied to Alaska and the
State paid 50 percent of its Medicaid costs.
Mr. Gilbertson informed that in 1997 then U.S. Senator Frank
Murkowski enabled the passage of a temporary adjustment to the
match rate the state of Alaska from 50 percent to 59.8 percent.
This generated approximately $100 in additional federal funding for
the State between the federal fiscal years 1998 and 2000. The
adjustment expired after three years at which time Senator
Murkowski was successful in securing a five-year extension, which
generated an additional $250 million for the State. The second
extension is due to expire in October 2005 and the match rate would
revert to 50 percent if no action were taken.
Mr. Gilbertson stressed the adjusted match rates are not intended
to benefit the state of Alaska without reason, but rather to offset
the higher cost to deliver health care in Alaska in comparison to
other states. Although per capita income is incrementally higher in
Alaska, health care delivery costs are significantly higher as
well. The federal government in the cost of living adjustments paid
to federal employees has acknowledged this. Congress twice
supported higher federal contributions for Medicaid in Alaska.
Mr. Gilbertson spoke to the fiscal impact to the State if the
adjustment were not extended. The federal contribution match rate
would be reduced to 50 percent. The seven percent reduction would
calculate to $53 million for FY 05, which the State would be
required to replace with general funds. He emphasized that the rate
reduction in FY 06 would only affect three-quarters of the state
fiscal year. By FY 07, the revenue reduction would equal almost $73
million. Over ten fiscal years, the total impact to the State
would be $914 million.
Mr. Gilbertson stated that this resolution requests the match rate
hold harmless the state of Alaska. He informed, "It is almost twice
the size of the second most affected state, which is Wyoming, which
sees a three-percentage point drop." The underlying formula that
determines the federal share is fundamentally flawed and does not
reflect the cost of health care. This resolution addresses this
discrepancy.
Co-Chair Wilken noted the $53 million reduction is not reflected in
the FY 06 operating budget. If Congress failed to provide an
extension, a supplemental appropriation would be required.
Co-Chair Green ascertained that the State's revenue for FY 06 would
be reduced $53 million.
Senator Hoffman understood the State's position on this matter. He
employs the same arguments to stress the high cost of delivering
services to rural Alaska. He asked the likelihood that the
extension would be granted.
Mr. Gilbertson replied that the chances are dependent upon various
factors, including other legislation. He worked for former U.S.
Senator Frank Murkowski at the time of the current extension and
reported that the process was challenging. Achieving this extension
would also be a challenge, although possible. The Alaska delegation
is aware of the importance of this funding and U.S. Senator Lisa
Murkowski has introduced legislation to address the matter.
Senator Bunde commented to the issue of reduced government
spending.
Co-Chair Wilken indicated that the matter of whether the fiscal
note for this resolution should be zero or reflect a loss of $53
million. He requested the resolution be held in Committee until the
matter was resolved.
Co-Chair Green ordered the bill HELD in Committee.
AT EASE 9:15:22 AM / 9:16:59 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|