Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 17
02/15/2011 01:00 PM House TRANSPORTATION
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR6 | |
| HJR4 | |
| HB30 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SJR 6 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HJR 4 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 30 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SJR 6-JT. PACIFIC ALASKA RANGE COMPLEX CHANGES
1:07:28 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON announced that the first order of business would
be SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 6, Urging the United States Army
and United States Air Force to extend the public comment period
for the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex Modernization and
Enhancement Environmental Impact Statement that ends February
18, 2011, for a minimum of 90 days to allow for effective
communication and full state and user involvement during the
comment period.
1:07:49 PM
DAVID SCOTT, Staff, Senator Donny Olson, Chair, Senate
Transportation Committee, Alaska State Legislature, ,on behalf
of the Senate Transportation Committee, sponsor, chaired by
Senator Olson, related that this resolution urges the U.S. Army
and the U.S. Air Force (USAF) to extend the comment period for
the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC) modernization and
enhancement environmental impact statement (EIS). He explained
that JPARC reduces the standard flight "floor" of 5,000 to as
low as 500 feet. Military training typically takes place above
5,000 feet but this training is for low flight training. The
Air Carriers Association and the Alaska Aviation Advisory Board
approached Senator Olson because of his long standing
involvement in the aviation industry. Originally the resolution
asked for a 90 day extension to the public comment period, but
this resolution reduces that extension to 30 days. In response
to Chair P. Wilson, he affirmed the two branches of service are
the USAF and U.S. Army.
1:10:44 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON related her understanding the military needs
additional air space, that Alaska's airspace is less occupied,
plus the military in interested in low flying flights for
training purposes.
MR. SCOTT related that the sponsor recognizes the military's
needs, the training is vitally important, and the sponsor
supports aviation. This resolution would allow citizens in the
affected area to have an expanded comment period. The original
comment period began on December 10, 2010 but the Air Carrier's
Association representative indicated the first JPARC meeting was
held on January 6, 2011, just prior to session.
1:12:13 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ asked whether any alternate sites are under
consideration.
MR. SCOTT answered several sites are under consideration, with
most of the sites located south of Fairbanks and in the
Matanuska-Susitna valley. He did not believe any training would
occur in Southeast Alaska.
1:12:50 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked whether the military would be
testifying.
MR. SCOTT indicated the military did not respond during the
Senate Transportation hearings. He offered that he spoke with
General Atkins and his subordinates, but they made a decision
hot to not testify.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG asked if notified of this hearing.
MR. SCOTT answered no.
CHAIR P. WILSON related if the military is following the issue
that staff would be aware of today's hearing.
1:13:58 PM
REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN recalled hearing testimony on this issue
in another hearing. He related his understanding that the
military would like to be able to train some pilots to fly at
lower level altitudes which is not feasible in the Lower 48
since the population density is much higher in the Lower 48.
Thus, Alaska is considered a good location for the low altitude
flight training due to its low density population.
1:14:56 PM
MIKE MORGAN, Board Member, Alaska Air Carriers Association,
Director of Operations; Warbelows Air Ventures, stated that the
main issue for the air carriers is a concern over access to
several villages within the military operations area (MOA) and
the effect of the proposed scoping changes on air
transportation. Several significant safety issues have created
conflicts with airline traffic. Therefore, the parties would
like a 30-day extension to allow the Native community and others
to comment on the planned scoping phase by the JPARC since the
comment period ends on Friday, February 18, 2011. He stated
that U.S. Senator Begich is meeting with the Alaska Air Carriers
Association Board on this subject. He offered his belief it is
possible to accommodate the military but that the parties simply
need more time to discuss the issues. He attended the January
6, 2011 JPARC meeting at Eielson AFB, but he recalled the public
was basically told, "This is the way it's going to be and
comments are welcome but they're not going to change their
mind." He reported he held conversations with the newly
appointed Deputy Commissioner of Department of Transportation &
Public Facilities (DOT&PF) and it seems that the air carriers
and DOT&PF are "not on the same page." He stressed that the air
carriers would like an additional 30 days in order to get the
communities involved, including the hunters, and private pilots
who fly in these areas. He expressed concern for their safety
and economic impact as the pilots need to fly out of their way
and use additional fuel to avoid the restricted area. He
concluded by reiterating his belief that the military can be
accommodated if the issue is discussed "with the right people in
the room in the planning stages."
1:17:43 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked what kind of changes would be
necessary on the north end of the Yukon MOA.
MR. MORGAN responded that three villages: Chalkyitsik, Circle,
and Central have restricted access for air transportation when
the MOAs are active. Currently, the air carriers can fly to
anytime using visual flight rules (VFR) but during inclement
weather instrument flight rules (IFR) rules are used and the
carriers cannot obtain clearance through MOA. Technology now
allows for global positioning system (GPS) approaches and GPS
enroute for point-to-point flights. Several villages would have
safer and more reliable transportation services if the MOA
borders were rearranged 15 to 20 miles. He pointed out that
once MOAs are in place they tend to stay in place forever so
this is an ideal time to work with the military to accommodate
them and address the changing transportation infrastructure. He
related his understanding that if the military needs to bring in
pilots from the Lower 48, they will need additional training
room. Currently, MOAs exist that encompass large areas of land
suitable for low flights. He personally recalled that on one
occasion about seven years ago an aircraft was in a flight
pattern in Central when two jets came screaming in below the
airliner at about 400 feet altitude.
MR. MORGAN said he would like to address incidents like this
one, and still keep corridors for civil transportation open. He
offered his belief that if he could discuss matters with the
USAF planning staff "we could make this work." He reiterated
that once rules are in place they seem to stay forever.
1:20:16 PM
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE asked whether the three villages currently
have GPS approaches.
MR. MORGAN answered that Chalkyitsik does have GPS approaches.
He recalled that Chalkyitsik is located only two miles inside
the MOA. He predicted that before long all villages with
airports will have GPS approaches.
REPRESENTATIVE FEIGE wondered what altitude is necessary to
raise the floor to allow for IFR traffic to pass below it.
MR. MORGAN answered in Chalkyitsik the ceiling could be lowered
3,000 to 4,000 feet, but that Circle and Central have mountains
surrounding them so the minimum altitude would need to be about
8,000 to 9,000 feet. He also expressed concern for access to
another village, the village of Eagle using IFR except by
passing through the MOA. He proposed that an IFR corridor from
8,000 to 10,000 thousand feet be established, which would also
solve Eagle's problem, he said.
1:21:43 PM
MR. MORGAN, in response to Chair Wilson, answered that one
problem is airline schedules are posted in advance, but the
military needs the flexibility to adjust its practice sessions
and may not want to commit to certain times. He said he thought
this point could be negotiated. He advised that this MOA plan
is an entirely new proposal. He remarked he was unaware of any
place in the country where an IFR corridor is approved for a
MOA. He also said that "we're kind of thinking outside of the
box trying to solve both problems."
1:22:28 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG related that both testifiers have
helped put the issue in perspective for him. He recalled the
Council of State Governments (CSG) has considered a new law in
Kansas to encourage the military to work with local government
and to have a continuing open line of communication. He
expressed concern that Alaska does not have something similar in
place. He summarized his understand is that the military hasn't
engaged in any real dialogue or expressed a willingness to do
so. Additionally, the military has not participated in today's
hearing. He suggested that the sponsor consider adding an
additional whereas and an additional resolved clause to address
the legislature's concern about a need for improved dialogue.
He said he hopes that something could be done.
CHAIR P. WILSON pointed out the time limit for public comment
will close on Friday so the committee will not have time to
address this issue in this body and also obtain concurrence.
1:24:53 PM
REX GOOLSBY related that he works for the University of Alaska
but is testifying today as a private pilot. He agreed that the
extension is necessary to allow for more time to consider the
MOAs. He also echoed earlier testimony that once the MOAs are
in place little can be done to change or modify them. He wanted
to round up other people interested in this issue to attend this
hearing, but many of the people who also wanted to weigh in on
this issue are out flying today. He stressed that this issue is
very important. He recollected five or six instances of near
misses in air traffic with the military training. He related a
scenario in which last August during red flag exercises several
incidents occurred with tourism flights. Although complaints
were lodged in those instances nothing seemed to change. He
offered his belief that the issues need to be aired and the
matter needs extra time to allow for open discussions. He liked
the suggestion of "opening the channel of dialogue" along with
obtaining responses to concerns to resolve the matter.
1:27:33 PM
CHAIR P. WILSON, after first determining no one else wished to
testify, closed public testimony on SJR 6.
REPRESENTATIVE GRUENBERG suggested a separate measure be
considered to address ongoing communications with the military.
REPRESENTATIVE MUNOZ moved to report SJR 6 out of committee with
individual recommendations and the attached zero fiscal notes.
There being no objection, SJR 6 was reported from the House
Transportation Standing Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| ATIF Fact Sheet 2011.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 -ATIF Sponsor Stmt ver B.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 ver B.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Persily Report.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 statutes.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 support documents.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB 30 Support Miners 1-2011.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HJR4 -Constitutional Change Sponsor Stmt.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 4 HJR $ |
| HJR004-OOG-DOE-2-11-11.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| HJR 4 Ver B.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| CS HJR 4 Ver I.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HJR 4 |
| HB 30 support Harbormasters.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| CS SJR6 Ver I.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 - sponsor statement.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| SJR 6 Alaska Aviation Support.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
SJR 6 |
| HB030-DOA-DMV-02-11-11.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB030-DOT-CO-2-11-11.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| HB30 appropriations spreadsheet (2).pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |
HB 30 |
| SJR 6 letters of support.pdf |
HTRA 2/15/2011 1:00:00 PM |