Legislature(2013 - 2014)BUTROVICH 205
02/14/2014 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB138 | |
| SJR5 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 138 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SJR 5 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SJR 5-OFFSHORE OIL & GAS REVENUE
4:49:59 PM
CHAIR GIESSEL announced that the next order of business would be
SJR 5.
4:50:40 PM
MICHELLE SYDEMAN, staff to Senator Bill Wielechowski, sponsor of
SJR 5, presented it on behalf of the sponsor. She said everyone
is aware of the vast oil and gas potential in the federal waters
off our coasts (OCS) - more than a billion acres on more than
6,000 miles of coastline. This area is believed to contain the
largest undiscovered energy resources in the United States,
estimated to be 25 billion barrels of oil and 132 tcf/natural
gas; more than the current estimates for the Atlantic and
Pacific regions of the OCS combined. The potential for
development is obviously enormous as is the potential benefit to
the U.S. Treasury.
A University of Alaska study found that energy production off
Alaska could generate 35,000 jobs on average annually over a 50
year period; the total payroll an estimated $80 billion. Since
statehood, the federal government has held numerous lease sales
off our coasts and collected more than $8 billion for them.
Unfortunately, Alaska has received little revenue in contrast to
what happens when the federal government leases within the
state's boundaries, in which case the host state receives 50
percent of the revenue - to compensate for any impacts they may
bear as a result of that development. This is an automatic
process that occurs off-budget at the federal level. The same
should hold true for offshore development where costs and risks
are often much greater.
MS. SYDEMAN said in 2006, the federal government recognized the
inequity and gave four states a 37.5 percent share of revenues
generated from offshore development; that did not include
Alaska. It did include Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, and
Alabama, and it makes to no sense for us to be left out of that
sort of arrangement.
She said fortunately the stars are coming closer in alignment in
Washington, D.C. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Committee is being by Senator Mary Landrieu, who has been a huge
advocate of OCS revenue sharing. She has joined forces with
Senator Lisa Murkowski and introduced a bill called Fixing
America's Inequities with Review Act (FAIR). The White House is
opposing this act and the primary reason is the cost and concern
over the federal deficit. Senator Murkowski said this was short
sighted because revenue sharing will enable the states to
support offshore development by investing in roads, ports, and
other necessary facilities, and to invest in the infrastructure
that will enable that development to be safe and environmentally
responsible. More off shore development will lead to greater
revenues for the federal government.
4:55:22 PM
MS. SYDEMAN said they had developed a committee substitute (CS)
after consulting with Mr. Adrian Herrera oh Arctic Power who
walked them through the White House's main concerns and those
were addressed in the CS. He advised that action very soon would
be helpful because Senator Landrieu would be pushing this in the
near term; and having a resolution sponsored by a Democratic
member of the state legislature would be helpful, because they
were trying to convince a Democratic administration.
SENATOR GIESSEL opened public testimony.
4:57:03 PM
ADRIAN HERRERA, Coordinator, Arctic Power, Anchorage, Alaska,
testified in support of SJR 5. He said their sole purpose is to
argue for the environmentally responsible development of the
federal lands in the Alaska Arctic, both on and offshore. He
cautioned that the resolution must address the White House's
specific concerns as laid out by the Congressional Budget Office
Secretary during the hearings for the FAIR Act last year. Senior
members of the committee support the bill and he expects it to
move this year. It is also supported by Senator Begich who has a
similar bill on revenue sharing but it is region specific.
He said the FAIR Act had one hearing last year in July and will
need another one. They have not come up with $6 billion, which
the Congressional Budget Office warns the bill asks to pay, but
it is spread over ten years. The White House's argument has to
do with the reduction of funds going to the national Treasury.
The President wants to use offshore revenues to fund the Land
Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) nationwide and other
environmental projects. But there is no intent to take a penny
away from LWCF; so for SCR 5 to succeed, it has to address this
concern.
5:00:30 PM
He opined that both sides can be aligned, but it's a case of the
state providing a rebuttal to the White House's arguments
against this to say we understand your concerns, but you can
fund LWCF and arrange the funding to states so that
environmental projects are mitigated. He explained that the 37.5
percent is made up of two sectors: 27.5 percent goes to the
state and then the state would have to apply to the Treasury for
an additional 10 percent, which could only be spent on
alternative energy development or environmental mitigation.
Until the Treasury was satisfied of the projects submitted for
money, it wouldn't award that 10 percent. He said this 10
percent is going for projects that are exactly the same as those
in the LWCF and the President's other environmental projects.
The new chairwoman has stated that these projects will be much
better mitigated on a state level than by the Treasury of
Department of Interior on a national level, since states are
much more efficient at environmental mitigation and spending
money appropriately with regard to OCS development.
5:02:30 PM
SENATOR GIESSEL, finding no questions, thanked him for his
testimony and closed public testimony.
SENATOR GIESSEL thanked Ms. Sydeman for updating them on this
legislation and said she was considering some amendments;
therefore, SJR 5 would be held in committee.
SENATOR MCGUIRE expressed her frustration about how Alaska is
viewed by the federal government and she would love to see a few
more whereases about what has been done in the state already to
relocating villages to prevent coastal erosion, funding the
Arctic University in Fairbanks, helping look at affordable
housing in villages, and looking at funding for deep water
ports. It's important to educate the federal government about
what the state is doing with these funds and what it is already
doing. For 20 years they had been asking for a Polar-class ice
breaker and haven't gotten one and they had been asking for help
developing the Arctic. Alaska has dug into its own coffers to do
this and it would be nice to have some additional revenue
sharing the way other Gulf Coast states have.
She said $250 billion in infrastructure needs had been
identified for the people of Alaska; it comes down to the
potential for oil spills occurring in the Bering Sea that has
fed the earth almost a billion tons of Pollock.
SENATOR GIESSEL said those were excellent comments. [SJR 5 was
held in committee.]
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SJR 5 vs A.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| SJR 5 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| SJR 5 Fiscal Note.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| Gov Parnell letter on OCS Revenue Sharing.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| Gulf of Mexico Act Sec 5.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| Petroleum News March 2 2008.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 5 |
| SRES, enalytica 20140214 UPDATED.pdf |
SRES 2/14/2014 3:30:00 PM |
SB 138 |