Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
02/16/2010 03:30 PM Senate COMMUNITY & REGIONAL AFFAIRS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR1 | |
| SB109 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SJR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 109 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SJR 1-LIMITING TERMS OF STATE LEGISLATORS
3:33:33 PM
CHAIR OLSON announced the first order of business to come before
the committee was SJR 1.
SENATOR MENARD, sponsor of SJR 1, said the resolution seeks to
put the question of term limits for legislators on the next
general election ballot. She said she strongly believes this
issue should be put to a vote of the people. According to SJR 1,
representatives would be limited to four terms and senators to
two terms, resulting in the ability for legislators to serve
eight years in their respective body. He or she must wait until
one complete term intervenes before running for office again.
She stated that Alaska's legislature was created with the
citizen legislator in mind and the state's founders never
intended for citizens to become career politicians. By limiting
the terms of law makers, other qualified persons in the state
would have a better chance to use their skills for the
betterment of Alaska. Typically, an incumbent in a House or
Senate race has the upper hand and legislators should not think
they are the only ones who can do the job.
She said term limits would end the perpetual election cycle and
allow legislators to concentrate on decisions that are best for
the state as opposed to their reelection chances. If term limits
were enacted by voters in the next general election, law makers
elected before the 2010 election would be grandfathered in and
their previous terms would not be counted against them.
3:36:16 PM
SENATOR THOMAS said Senator Menard would get more support from
the Senate if the term limit for senators was also four terms.
SENATOR MENARD said she understood that.
CHAIR OLSON asked how Senator Menard came up with two terms for
the Senate and four terms for the House.
SENATOR MENARD said she considered what would be fair. Term
limits in place in 15 states and under consideration in 6 more
states are "all over the board." A typical career is 20 years,
or 10 years for younger people; in 2050, young people will have
had four different careers.
She said she had heard a lot of pushback, including the feeling
that term limits are enforced by the polls already. She felt a
career politician has become connected and networked and has an
advantage over anyone trying to break through. She explained
that corruption in a state triggers legislation, resolutions to
reach voters and examination of career politicians. She said she
serves with the best legislators she could hope for but she ran
on the issue of term limits and is serious about it.
3:39:07 PM
SENATOR FRENCH read from the resolution: "No person who has
served as senator for two full or partial successive terms shall
again be eligible to hold that office until one term has
intervened." He said he assumed a full term is four years and a
partial term is anything less. He said he ran right after a
redistricting effort and was given a two-year term. Under the
terms of SJR 1, he would have been limited to six years in the
Senate. He asked Senator Menard if that was her understanding.
SENATOR MENARD replied that was her understanding and said the
appointment of a position like Senator Coghill's is another
similar situation.
SENATOR FRENCH asked if Senator Coghill would be limited to five
years: his current one-year term and then the next four-year
term.
SENATOR MENARD replied that was correct. She noted that she had
gone back and forth on that issue and it could be changed in the
Judiciary Committee.
CHAIR OLSON asked if a person could serve a term or two in the
House and subsequently run for the Senate.
CHAIR MENARD answered yes. She said a person could start in the
House for six years and then move to the Senate for eight years.
CHAIR OLSON noted that a learning curve exists for many
legislators, including him, who had never been involved in any
other office, such as a city council or school board. He asked
if Senator Menard expected legislators to be productive during
the first year or two while they get their feet on the ground.
3:41:53 PM
SENATOR MENARD replied that helpful staff, with a lot of
longevity, work with the legislators. She noted that the
lobbyists are helpful as well. After one year, a legislator
should be catching on. She said getting up to speed is not as
difficult as the public had been told.
SENATOR FRENCH encouraged Senator Menard to look at states with
term limits to see if the public is happier with their
legislators and if the term limits alleviate concerns about
career politicians. He said a 2004 paper on term limits by the
National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL) was referred to in
the committee packet and he would like to look at it.
SENATOR MENARD said she met Mr. Patrick Taylor's wife, of the
Taylor Foundation in Louisiana, a state with term limits. She
learned that some of the students that the Taylor Foundation had
put through college are now legislators. She said those students
would not have had that opportunity without term limits.
She recognized that legislators are protective of their jobs and
love what they do. She reiterated, however, that SJR 1 was
spurred on by the recent corruption in the Legislature.
3:44:45 PM
SENATOR THOMAS asked how long term limits have been in place in
other states, about the history of term limits and about the
results.
MICHAEL ROVITO, staff to Senator Menard, replied that many
states adopted term limits in the early 1990's, with Nebraska
being the most recent to do so in 2000. All states enacted the
term limits several years after adopting them. Voters in these
states approved term limits overwhelmingly.
SENATOR THOMAS said he was relatively new himself and thinks a
learning curve exists; one feels better after the first year of
dealing with the issues. He pointed out that the Legislature has
huge issues to deal with and it is important that people have
the ability to look back. He pointed out that getting up to
speed on something like ACES would take a great deal of effort.
He felt that even with helpful staff, if he had not sat through
the 2007 ACES hearings himself, he would have little idea what
is going on now and perhaps less interest. Long time legislators
have built up historical knowledge.
3:47:12 PM
CHAIR OLSON opened public testimony.
DON BENSON, representing himself, Matanuska Valley, said term
limits come into play after major cases of corruption and often
would have curtailed some of the long-term relationships that
possibly led to some corruption. He said the Constitution never
intended for career politicians and we need new people and fresh
ideas. He felt term limits do not keep citizens from returning
to office, and after sitting out one term they can go back into
office again. He pointed out that many offices only get eight
years or less. Because the state is supposed to be run by and
for the people, he urged the committee to let the people vote on
term limits.
3:50:29 PM
CHAIR OLSON closed public testimony and held SJR 1 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsor Statement SJR1.pdf |
SCRA 2/16/2010 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| SJR1 Back up information.pdf |
SCRA 2/16/2010 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| SJR 1 Frequently Asked Questions.pdf |
SCRA 2/16/2010 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| SB 109 Memo re Moore vs State.pdf |
SCRA 2/16/2010 3:30:00 PM |
SB 109 |