Legislature(2011 - 2012)BUTROVICH 205
03/28/2011 03:30 PM Senate RESOURCES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB85 | |
| HJR19 | |
| SCR9 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 85 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SCR 9 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HJR 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SCR 9-TAKU RIVER TASK FORCE
4:40:11 PM
CO-CHAIR WAGONER announced the consideration of [SCR 9] and
asked the co-chair for a motion to bring the resolution before
the committee.
4:41:31 PM
Brief at ease.
CO-CHAIR PASKVAN moved to bring SCR 9, version A, before the
committee.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER objected for discussion purposes.
JESSE KIEHL, staff to Senator Egan, sponsor of SCR 9, said that
over the last few years, Alaskans in Southeast have discussed a
wide variety of ideas about the Taku River, and sometimes the
conversations were heated. He explained that the proposed Taku
River Task Force would provide a forum for future discussions
and recommendations for the best management of the resources in
that river. The task force was designed to represent a balanced
cross section of user-groups and was small enough so as to not
be unwieldy. Their recommendations would be due by December 1,
2011.
SENATOR STEDMAN said he wasn't sure what the resolution did.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER summarized that it establishes a task force to
review the requests for restrictions and opinions about what
should be done with the waterway. A proposal from a Canadian
mining company was to run a hovercraft up the river. He asked if
that was two years ago.
MR. KIEHL clarified that there wasn't a current proposal for
permits, but past proposals have raised concerns and questions
about activity on the river. The task force would review the
issues and the associated science, but the sponsor didn't want
the resolution to presuppose anything. The idea was to gather
the best knowledge and consider all the interests of all
resource users before making any recommendations to public
agencies. Recommendations to change regulations would go through
a public process and recommendations to change the law would go
before the legislature.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER asked if it was presumptuous to suggest putting
sideboards on the task force.
4:46:07 PM
MR. KIEHL replied the first thing a task force like this should
do is to get up to speed on the existing rules, regulations and
sideboards.
SENATOR STEDMAN asked for confirmation that the resolution
wouldn't preclude a recommendation to build a road or railway
into the area.
MR. KIEHL replied this resolution does not tie the hands of the
group before it starts meeting. If the recommendation of the
task force was to build a road or railway, that's what it would
bring forward.
SENATOR STEDMAN asked if the task force would be precluded from
asking for an expansion of wilderness designations.
MR. KIEHL replied the task force could theoretically come up
with that recommendation as well.
SENATOR STEDMAN pointed out that both the Taku River valley and
the Stikine River valley have been trade routes for thousands of
years, and a long-term goal in Southeast has been to develop
access to the outside. One corridor was north up the Lynn Canal
and others were the Taku, the Stikine and the Bradfield. He
questioned the composition and narrow representation of the task
force.
MR. KIEHL explained that the task force would include the three
elected legislators from the Juneau area, and their positions on
increasing access to the area are matters of public record. The
commissioner of fish and game or the commissioner's designee
would also be a member. The four public members would include 1)
one owner of private recreational property in the Taku river
valley; 2) one commercial fishing permit holder registered in
area A; 3) one owner or employee of a business that derives
significant income from transportation to or within the Taku
River; and 4) one person who uses but does not consume Taku
River resources.
MR. KIEHL said he had no reason to believe that radical or
extreme recommendations would come from the task force.
SENATOR STEVENS asked for an explanation of a "person who uses
but does not consume Taku River resources."
MR. KIEHL replied the notion of a non-consumptive user was
initially inspired by the local fish and game advisory
committee, and was designed to provide some breadth of opinion
on the issues. It would, for example, include people who float
rivers or take photographs.
4:50:37 PM
SENATOR MCGUIRE noted the controversy related to developing an
economic barging or traffic corridor in the area, and asked if
consideration was given to putting someone from the
transportation community on the task force.
MR. KIEHL replied the task force does have one business member
that derives significant income from transportation to or within
the Taku River. There is an established business that hauls
supplies to the area, there's a lodge in the area and the area
is serviced by a number businesses that provide air
transportation in and out. All of these businesses have an
interest in the future of the river.
SENATOR MCGUIRE responded that there's a distinction between
those businesses and a marine transportation company or a barge
owner and their perspectives would be widely divergent. She then
expressed reservation about delving into a very local issue
about which she knew very little.
4:53:48 PM
CO-CHAIR WAGONER agreed that this was a local issue and
suggested that the City and Borough of Juneau should bring the
resolution to the legislature.
SENATOR STEDMAN highlighted that there were long-standing treaty
issues with Canada related to the Stikine corridor and that may
or may not be the case with the Taku corridor as well. In any
event, that should be sorted out before going forward.
MR. KIEHL said the Taku River flows across the international
boundary so treaties are involved, and there was also interplay
between the local municipality and various departments within
the state. Those are the complexities the task force would
address and then bring their recommendations to the appropriate
agencies.
4:57:11 PM
KIRK HARDCASTLE, commercial fisherman and owner/operator, Taku
River Reds, stated support for SCR 9. He highlighted that the
economic road map of Taku River salmon shows that they interact
with all the commercial fish processing plants in Southeast
Alaska. The Taku River sustains all five species of salmon and
has active commercial, sport and subsistent fishing for nearly
six months each year.
4:58:58 PM
CHRIS CASEY, professional fly fishing guide, stated support for
SCR 9. He described the Taku River as a vital public economic
and cultural resource. It is Southeast's largest overall salmon
producer, and according to the 2004 McDowell report, the fishery
is worth over $7 million annually and supports nearly 500 jobs.
There is broad support for increased protection through
legislation.
NEIL MACKINNON, secretary, Taku Users Group, stated that the
Taku River was the last trans-boundary river not encumbered by a
park, wilderness, wild and scenic or other restrictive
designation. That alone was reason for cautious and careful
consideration of the present and future effect of any action. In
particular, a critical habitat designation would be an
unjustifiable misallocation of Alaska's resources that could not
provide commensurate benefit to its citizens.
5:03:10 PM
CHERI RUDOLPH, president, Taku River Recreational Association
(TRRA), said it is TRRA's position that the need for the Taku
River Task Force was unwarranted. The impetus for the resolution
was to further a continuing agenda for special interest groups
seeking a critical habitat or a wild and scenic designation for
this watershed.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER asked the current membership of the TRRA.
MS. RUDOLPH replied one year ago 414 members voted against
critical habitat for the area and 18 in favor. She noted that
the tally was submitted to the sponsor.
5:05:13 PM
NIEL ATKINSON, representing himself, said he was a Taku River
property owner who opposed SCR 9. He opined that appointments to
any task force can be made to ensure a certain end result. The
resolution doesn't direct the task force to look at historic
commercial and private uses and future operations that some may
feel are critical to the enjoyment of their lifestyle.
5:06:51 PM
CARLEEN CONWAY, representing herself, said she was a cabin owner
on the Taku River who opposed SCR 9. The idea for the task force
was primarily brought up by a special interest group with a
specific agenda. Furthermore, the task force would not supersede
the ADF&G advisory committee or the international trans-boundary
laws.
5:07:59 PM
ERROL CHAMPION, representing himself, said the supporting
material for the resolution included an article from the Juneau
Empire about wintertime barge traffic on the Taku River. He was
quoted expressing deep concern about the project and was a
little resentful that it was included since the information
dated back to 2008. At this point, both the business and the
project were defunct, and there was nothing on record about
future permit applications. He said he was also troubled by the
efforts to get the Taku River area designated as critical
habitat. He urged the committee not to pass the resolution.
5:09:34 PM
JEV SHELTON, representing himself, said he had commercially
fished the Taku River for at least 40 years and hoped to
continue. He stated support for proceeding with the review
because the Taku River problems were real. The mining company
that proposed the hoverbarge operation up and down the river did
fail financially, but not before it put a scare in the
community. Even though it was clear that it would wreak havoc
with the fishery resource, it appeared to be on the verge of
being permitted. He said the fishing-related industry in Juneau
supports getting more sensible control over the things that can
occur to the Taku River fishery habitat. He emphasized that the
interest was only in maintaining the habitat in the river and
not sacrificing a significant part of the non-government
employment in the Juneau community. He said there was already
another applicant for that mine and it was a misconception to
think that it wasn't the right time to set up a proper
procedure, because the proposal will come up again.
5:12:09 PM
RON SOMERVILLE, Territorial Sportsmen Inc., cautioned that the
environmental community had for some time been focused on
establishing an international body to govern trans-boundary
rivers like the Stikine and Taku. He said he was also somewhat
disappointed that the task force did not include a sport
fisherman. He pointed out that the resolution was about barging
down the Taku River and possibly impacting fisheries, but it
covered game as well. He recommended removing any reference to
game and appointing more people to the task force, with
particular consideration given to the Territorial Sportsmen
since it was the largest conservation group in Juneau. He
further suggested that if the report to the legislature was
majority based that there should also be an opportunity for a
minority report so that legislators could get the whole picture.
CO-CHAIR WAGONER announced he would hold SCR 9 in the Senate
Resources Standing Committee.
5:15:16 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
CO-CHAIR WAGONER adjourned the Senate Resources Standing
Committee meeting at 5:15 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| CSHJR 19 sponsor statement.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - EDT and RES Changes (for Senate Resources).pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Leg Research Report (revises 3.11.11).pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Senate Resources Hearing Request.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR 19 - Zero Fiscal Note.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| HJR019C.PDF |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
HJR 19 |
| SCR 9_Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Version A.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_Juneau AC Letter.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_Map.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_McDowell Taku Report ExSumm.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |
| SCR 9_Supporting Documents_News Articles.pdf |
SRES 3/28/2011 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 9 |