Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/05/2000 03:20 PM Senate RES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SCR 3-SOVEREIGNTY OF THE STATE; RESOURCES
SENATOR TAYLOR, sponsor of SCR 3, explained that SCR 3 addresses
where Alaska stands in regard to the federal mandate over fish and
game management on federal lands in Alaska. At present, the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) is negotiating with
federal agencies about fish and game management in rivers. Senator
Taylor said he believes the ADFG negotiations completely violate
the Governor's comment that no Governor should ever barter away the
state's sovereign right to manage its lands, waters and resources.
The federal government is violating the Tenth Amendment and
attempting to treat Alaskans as second class citizens. It is also
violating the 14th Amendment and about 11 different provisions of
the Alaska Constitution according to two different court cases; the
Totemoff case and the McDowell case. SCR 3 tells Congress it has
made a mistake and asks it to remove the federal mandate and to
support the Governor's efforts to overturn the Katie John case.
MR. DALE BONDURANT, representing himself, stated support for SCR 3.
He recounted a discussion between Senator Stevens and Mr. Mitchell
at a Congressional hearing in 1978 in which Senator Stevens said,
It's another thing to give the Secretary of Interior veto
rights and on the pretext of saying that subsistence
provisions in Alaska law are not adaptable to protect the
Alaska Natives and give them the right to give back to the
Department of Interior the overriding controls of fish and
game on federal lands in Alaska. It violates the intent of
the statute that would deny the states the [inaudible] and, in
violation of what I consider to be inherent constitutional
rights, of the State to equality. We are an equal partner in
the Union and we are not to be treated that way. Now, if we
want to go into some cooperative management program where the
federal government participates in it and if it appoints the
joint board that's one thing, but to leave veto powers and the
right to preempt the state is wrong.
Mr. Mitchell responded,
The federal government has an interest out there. They can
enforce, and all we do with oversight provision - I can't
expect the Senator to respectfully disagree with me - is to
force the Secretary of the Interior to do something positive
for a change. He's got that last right.
Senator Stevens then said,
He does not have it today. The [inaudible] Act does not give
him the right. He has the right to post an area for hunting
but he does not have a right to take away from the state the
right to manage hunting. Now, under this bill, he would be
entitled again, under the pretext that the state subsistence
provision for Natives was not sufficient and to take over the
entire management on federal lands, military posts, BLM, park
lands, fish and wildlife lands, under the pretext of one
incident, he could take back the whole thing.
MR. BONDURANT stated it is time for Alaska to stand up and say it
has a sovereign right like any other state.
There being no one else wishing to testify on SCR 3, SENATOR TAYLOR
moved SCR 3 from committee with individual recommendations. There
being no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|