Legislature(2017 - 2018)BUTROVICH 205
03/07/2017 03:30 PM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SJR1 | |
| SCR1 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SJR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SCR 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SCR 1-UNIFORM RULES: ABSTAIN FROM VOTING
4:16:14 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY called the committee back to order and announced
the consideration of SCR 1.
4:16:48 PM
SENATOR BERTA GARDNER, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska,
sponsor of SCR 1, set forth that SCR 1 can be described by a
quote from "To Kill a Mockingbird," "The one thing that doesn't
abide by majority rule is a person's conscience."
She said the Legislature relies on Uniform Rule 34(b) when it
comes to conflict of interest for legislators' voting. She
summarized that Uniform Rule 34(b) says a member can ask for
unanimous consent that he or she be excused from voting because
they have a conflict of interest and then the member describes
their conflict of interest. She explained that theoretically if
nobody objects, the person is allowed not to vote. She pointed
out that in her years in the Legislature, someone in the body
has always objected and the presiding officer says the person
must vote.
She noted that the conflict of interest rule has regularly been
an issue with the public. She disclosed that there have been 13
bills and resolutions that have tried to address the issue of
conflict of interest in voting since 2007 and none have passed.
She revealed that she has addressed a variety of ideas and
talked to legislators, but she has not found a good solution.
She said the bottom line is a person's conscious should be the
guide.
She explained that SCR 1 proposes to simply require that when a
person stands up and asks to be excused for voting, describes
the conflict of interest and somebody objects, all three parts
become part of the record. She noted that she has claimed a
conflict of interest on things that she knew were not really a
conflict of interest; however, she pointed out that nobody wants
to be accused of failing to disclose. She detailed that she has
claimed a conflict of interest regarding real estate because her
daughter sells real estate as well as claiming a conflict for
her son-in-law because he works for an oil company. She opined
that legislators tend to over-disclose to "cover our bases."
SENATOR GARDNER set forth that she is trying to solve the
conflict of interest problem so that when a person has a genuine
conflict there ultimately is a path. She said she wants to
change the culture because the culture is to always make people
vote. She asserted that a person's conscious should hold if
there really is a conflict of interest.
She stated that SCR 1 is a clear proposal to just make a
conflict of interest part of the record. She remarked that the
resolution is a "sunshine measure" that is not complex or hard
to understand.
4:20:13 PM
SENATOR COGHILL thanked Senator Gardner for tackling the
conflict of interest issue and stated that the subject has been
a conundrum for many years. He agreed that putting a
legislator's conflict of interest on the record is a good idea.
He stated that the final sentence has some good parts and bad
parts:
Upon a member's request to be excused from voting, the
clerk or secretary shall record in the journal the
member requesting to be excused, the stated reason for
the request, and, if an objection to the request is
made, the member or members who objected.
He said SCR 1 is one good way of saying that if a legislator is
going to declare a conflict of interest, at least the
declaration will be a matter of record. He expressed that he is
grateful that Senator Gardner "wondered out into this
territory."
SENATOR GARDNER replied that her resolution is, "Just the toe
into the deep water."
SENATOR GIESSEL asked if the committee could hear from Mr.
Anderson from Legislative Ethics and noted that she was
interested in his opinion on the legislation.
4:21:29 PM
JERRY ANDERSON, Administrator, The Select Committee on
Legislative Ethics, Alaska State Legislature, Juneau, Alaska,
explained that the SCR 1 is from the Uniform Rules and not from
the Legislative Ethics Act itself. He detailed that the
Legislative Ethics Act statute references the Uniform Rules and
that is the only connection with the Legislative Ethics Act.
4:22:40 PM
SAMANTHA HARRIS, Staff, Senator Berta Gardner, Alaska State
Legislature, Juneau, Alaska, explained that Mr. Anderson was
asked to be available if the committee's conversation entered
the Legislature's ethics laws. She pointed out that there is
some documentation that occurs when a legislator declares a
conflict, but the nature of the conflict is not recorded, and
the practice is that if multiple objections are made the record
will just say, "objections were made." She added that if the
Senate secretary or chief clerk can discern who the legislator
was that objected, on occasion they will record who made the
objection, but the act is not always the practice.
She disclosed that legislative research was unable to determine
any instance in the Alaska Legislature's history when unanimous
consent was given for a declaration of a conflict of interest.
She added that the National Conference of State Legislatures
provided a summary of voting recusal provisions and in the end
the summation was unable to identify any other state that dealt
with conflict of interest declarations as Alaska where unanimous
consent was required.
MS. HARRIS summarized that SCR 1 seeks to put more conflict of
interest declarations on the record as a matter of transparency.
4:25:00 PM
CHAIR DUNLEAVY held SCR 1 in committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SCR 1 - Version A.PDF |
SSTA 3/7/2017 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 1 |
| SCR 1-Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SSTA 3/7/2017 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 1 |
| SCR 1 - Supporting Document - Voting Recusal Provisions in 50 states.pdf |
SSTA 3/7/2017 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 1 |
| SCR 1- Fiscal Note LEG.pdf |
SSTA 3/7/2017 3:30:00 PM |
SCR 1 |
| SJR 1 - Fiscal Note Division of Elections.pdf |
SSTA 3/7/2017 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |
| SJR 1 - Written Testimony.pdf |
SSTA 3/7/2017 3:30:00 PM |
SJR 1 |