Legislature(1993 - 1994)
04/26/1994 09:02 AM Senate CRA
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
The next order of business to come before the committee was SB 375 (GENERAL GRANT LAND ENTITLEMENTS). SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS stated testimony would be taken over the Legislative Teleconference Network. Number 355 GEORGE WAGNER, Vice Chair, Denali Borough Planning Committee, related that the planning committee has been directed by the borough assembly to formulate a comprehensive land use plan for the borough, as well as to identify specific lands and related criteria for municipal entitlement lands as provided for in statute. He stated the Denali Borough's strong support for SB 375. Number 368 DOUG BRADDOCK, representing the Fairbanks North Star Borough, voiced their support for the passage of SB 375. The borough has been very aggressive in developing a plan to not only increase the local tax base, but also to generate revenue for the borough, which they believe is especially important with the proposed cuts to state revenue sharing and assistance to local governments. Number 380 SENATOR ADAMS asked if the Fairbanks North Star Borough has an economic plan they can utilize if SB 375 passes. DOUG BRADDOCK replied that they are in the process of putting together what they have been calling a business plan for the management of their entitlement lands, but it is not yet complete. However, if the bill passes they would include that 58,000 acres of land in their plan. Number 388 KEITH QUINTAVELL, representing the North Slope Borough, said the borough endorses a proposal that would be the most equitable to Alaska's municipalities. SB 375 would establish a single simple formula for municipal land entitlement which is applicable to all cities, boroughs and unified municipalities; it would return to the Legislature, not the Division of Lands, the authority for designating which lands are of such paramount importance to statewide interest that they should not be made available for economic development by municipalities, but should be designated as state parks; and it would delete the certification deadlines, vesting dates, and application deadlines currently contained in statute. Number 425 JEFF PARKER, Anchorage Fish & Game Advisory Committee, stated the committee opposes SB 375 for the same reasons it opposes HB 259. There is no information that supports the 10 percent figure, or any other figure. There is concern with the redefinition of VUU lands in that it eliminates from the present statutes the provisions that effectively require that if land is classified in the DNR land use planning process as habitat it is not available for selection. With passage of SB 375 the state will give away its most valuable habitat and its most valuable lands for public use. Number 466 RON SWANSON, Director, Division of Land, Department of Natural Resources, stated the department does not support SB 375 because they do not believe it is equitable to grant land entitlements based on a formula. The department also does not support the elimination of the definition of VUU, which, he said, basically throws the land use planning process in chaos. He added that if the committee decides to move the bill, he has some amendments he would like the committee consider. Number 490 SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS asked if there was any support to combine HB 259 and SB 375. It was agreed to by the members that each bill be dealt with separately. Number 500 RON SWANSON outlined the department's proposed amendments to SB 375: (1) Delete the term "Vacant, Unappropriated, Unreserved" wherever it occurs in the bill and insert "state general grant land" in its place. (2) Delete Section 6 in its entirety. The section basically orders the director to rescind conveyances that were made to land that was not Vacant, Unappropriated, Unreserved. Once land has been conveyed to a municipality, the director has absolutely no authority to rescind that conveyance. (3) Amend Section 7 to eliminate the requirement for the director to approve or disapprove each selection for patent within nine months of its selection by a municipality, because it would create an unreal workload on the Division of Land. (4) If VUU is eliminated, the definition of "general grant land" needs to be changed in Section 10. There being no other witnesses to testify on SB 375, SENATOR RANDY PHILLIPS stated the bill and the proposed amendments would be back before the committee at its next meeting.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|