Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/29/2004 08:08 AM Senate JUD
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 369-UNIV. STUDENT PRACTICUM LIABILITY/WAGES
SENATOR PETE KELLY, representing the University of Alaska (UA),
told members that SB 369 addresses a problem that UA has
encountered. About five years ago, UA was given money for the
first time over and above the amount needed for operating costs.
With that, the Board of Regents and President established a
number of new degree programs that are more "hands on," most of
which deal with medical professions and the construction
industry. A number of these programs require a certain number of
hours of practicum work. As UA has approached providers for
practicum purposes, it has learned that liability has become
more of a problem that is discouraging some employers from
participating in the programs. Many of the programs are growing
and UA anticipates continued growth. This year in Fairbanks, UA
was able to only arrange the bare minimum requirements for its
dental program. That situation brought the UA's attention the
need to address a statutory resolution to give some relief from
liability to the providers.
MR. KELLY said SB 369 states that for purposes of a practicum
program, the students are not to be considered employees. If
they were considered as employees, the employer would be
strictly liable, which is where the problem lies. SB 369 makes
participants responsible for their own liability. If UA is
negligent, it would be responsible, likewise with the employer
or student. He explained, "Also, in anticipation that the courts
might determine that the experiential benefit of being able to
...derive experience and education from these companies might
trigger the Fair Labor Standards Act, we also have a recommended
section in there dealing with minimum wage so that it could not
be claimed that the students who are currently not paid - and as
a matter of fact that is the nature of a practicum program is
that they are not paid, they are different from interns - that
they couldn't trigger the Fair Labor Standards Act and require
these providers to give them minimum wage." He deferred to Mr.
Parrish to answer questions. He affirmed that Mr. Parrish
produced the 6-page analysis in members' packets.
CHAIR SEEKINS asked Mr. Parrish to summarize the liability that
UA would have if SB 369 does not pass.
MR. JAMO PARRISH, general legal counsel for UA, said SB 369
addresses the liability of the practicum site, not the liability
of UA. However, UA currently is liable for any negligence it
commits and SB 369 would not change that. The practicum site
would be liable for any negligence it commits; SB 369 does not
seek to change that. However, as Mr. Kelly said, the practicum
site, if it is determined to be an employer, would be liable for
any negligence committed by the student, which is the concern
that SB 369 would address.
CHAIR SEEKINS asked if SB 369 will prevent a practicum student
from initiating a wage and hour action at a later date against
the company that agreed to provide the student with practical
experience.
MR. PARRISH said that is correct.
CHAIR SEEKINS announced that with no further questions, he would
set the bill aside and move on to HB 188.
Upon reconvening, SENATOR OGAN moved CSSB 369(L&C) from
committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal
note(s). There being no objection, the motion carried.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|