Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/08/2004 08:00 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 336(JUD)
"An Act imposing a correctional facility surcharge on persons
convicted of a crime under state law and on persons whose
probation is revoked; relating to fees and expenses for
interstate transfer of probation or parole; and providing for
an effective date."
This was the first hearing for this bill in the Senate Finance
Committee.
Co-Chair Wilken stated this bill, sponsored by the Senate Rules
Committee at the request of the Governor, "imposes a surcharge on a
person arrested and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. The amount
of the surcharge depends on the seriousness of the crime."
PORTIA PARKER, Deputy Commissioner, Department of Corrections,
testified this bill would impose $100 surcharge to those convicted
of a felony and a $50 surcharge to those convicted of a
misdemeanor. In addition, she stated a surcharge of $100 is imposed
to those serving probation, which is suspended unless the offender
violates the terms of their probation, the probation is revoked and
the offender is returned to custody.
Ms. Parker continued that this legislation would also impose a $100
application fee for probationers and parolees transferring
residency to another state under the interstate compact. She noted
most other states currently impose this fee. She furthered that
this provision would require that bond be posted before the
probationer or parolee could transfer to another state. She gave
the reason for this fee as the high expense to retrieve and
transport back to Alaska, an offender who has violated parole
conditions. She qualified this fee is far below the actual costs,
but would serve to offset the expenses. She added that most
jurisdictions, whether counties, municipalities or states, impose
these fees, commonly referred to as "booking charges" in amounts
from $50 to as high as $50 per day.
MARK ANTRIM, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, expressed the
proposed fee amounts are average or below average the amounts
charged in other jurisdictions. He added that the bonding fee
amount of $1250 is derived from U.S. Marshals Service calculations
based on the average cost of retrievals across the country.
Co-Chair Wilken asked why the fiscal note reflects a rapid increase
in costs, then levels off.
Ms. Parker replied this is a common with the implementation of all
new court fees or collections. She stated this fiscal note was
drafted based on other situations whereby new court fees were
imposed. She calculated the increase would level off at
approximately 60 to 65 percent collection rate, which is estimated
to be approximately $1.3 million.
Senator Dyson appreciated the intent of the legislation. He asked
if assets of a parolee could be seized to fulfill a standing
restitution order, if that parolee were returned to Alaska for
violation of parole conditions.
Commissioner Antrim replied that as a matter of practice, the
Department does not permit parolees or probationers to leave the
State if a restitution order is outstanding. He qualified that if
an offender flees the jurisdiction, the situation is different.
Senator Dyson clarified that parolees are not permitted to transfer
out of Alaska if a restitution order is outstanding.
Commissioner Antrim affirmed.
Senator Bunde pointed out that suspects are often encouraged to
plead guilty, as the costs to the State are lower if no trial is
involved. He wondered whether the proposed surcharge would provide
a disincentive to offenders to plead guilty.
Co-Chair Green offered a motion to report the bill from Committee
with individual recommendations and accompanying fiscal note.
Senator Bunde objected for discussion.
Senator Bunde proposed waiving this fee for those who plead guilty.
Commissioner Antrim informed that the expenses incurred in booking
a suspect are significant, which this fee would partially offset.
Ms. Parker furthered that 90 percent of criminal cases are settled
either with a plea agreement or a bargaining of the charges
imposed. Therefore, she stated that an exemption for these
offenders would eliminate the majority of revenue generated from
the fee program.
Senator Bunde removed his objection to reporting the bill from
Committee.
Without objection, CS SB 336 (JUD) MOVED from Committee with fiscal
note #2 of $46,500 from the Department of Law.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|