Legislature(2003 - 2004)
04/29/2004 12:27 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 315
An Act relating to the administration of commercial
fishing entry permit buy-back programs.
CHERYL SUTTON, JOINT LEGISLATIVE SALMON INDUSTRIES TASK
FORCE, SENATOR BEN STEVENS, stated that SB 315 was the
Senate companion to HB 410. It is precisely the same bill
as HB 410. There have been no amendments on the Senate side
and it passed the Senate unanimously. SB 315 modifies
existing law governing buy-back programs. It would allow
the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission to "front fund" a
buy-back program if an appropriation were received. The
commission would then continue to collect funds through the
designated rate of assessment in the buy-back program to
"pay back" the indebtedness. She added that when the
optimum number of permits is reached in a buy-back and the
reasonable costs of the program have been met, the
Commission would terminate the assessment in the affected
fishery. SB 31 will make the administration of a buy-back
program more workable.
Representative Chenault asked about current law buy-backs
contained in the bill analysis.
FRANK HOMAN, COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ENTRY
COMMISSION, explained that current law is that the
Commercial Fisheries Limited Entry Commission, after the
determination of the outcome number and when that number
indicates too many permits in the fishery, a buy-back
program could be established. That language is already in
the fish law. It could increase to 7%, up to 1 through 7
depending on how much money is needed for the buy back
program.
Representative Chenault asked if it would be voluntary, or
would the commission make the determination regarding the
optimum number. Mr. Homan responded that it would come
about through the interaction with the fishing community.
Representative Chenault pointed out that was a concern with
commercial fishermen in his area whether or not they were
interested in a buy-back. These fishermen want to be
"heavily involved in that process". Mr. Homan responded
that there would be a public hearing process.
DON BREMNER, CENTRAL COUNCIL BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT, JUNEAU, voiced opposition to the proposed
legislation. He noted handouts that support his position.
(Copy on File). Mr. Bremner pointed out that there is no
justification or complete analysis for the legislation and
how the buy backs would affect the fishermen. He spoke to
finding solutions experienced by the fishermen. The
fishermen want to find options. Mr. Bremner recommended
that the State should be looking at adding back permits for
the rural communities, as it is the only resource for many
of them. He reiterated that strong enough reasons have not
been addressed.
Mr. Bremner noted that the Central Council sent out a
proposal to Senator Elton and Senator Stevens requesting a
further look at the proposal. The proposal suggests that a
complete analysis be performed of the buy back and limited
entry systems. He did not know how the legislation would
affect the prices to the fishermen. He reiterated that
special attention needs to be given to rural communities.
Mr. Bremner suggested that the permit banks would be a
better idea for taking care of future generations and then
they would not have to come back to the Legislature to
address these concerns. Ms. Sutton commented that the bill
does not establish or promote any buy back.
Representative Chenault noted that he had no fiscal note in
his file. Ms. Sutton said that was correct.
Representative Foster MOVED to report SB 315 out of
Committee with individual recommendations and with the
fiscal note.
Mr. Homan pointed out that there was a zero note and that
there would be no buy back and that could be used if the
State ever got to that point. The only thing the bill does
at this time, is indicate that there could be a buy back
program if there was an opportunity to get up-front funding
from some source, then the legislation would allow that to
happen rather than waiting for years to accumulate an
assessment.
Representative Stoltze commented that there are options and
that when the bill gets to the House floor, discussions
should be made regarding these concerns.
There being NO OBJECTION, SB 315 was reported out of
Committee with a "do pass" recommendation and with zero note
#1 by the Department of Fish & Game.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|