Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
03/31/2010 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB33 | |
| SB305 | |
| SB139 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 305 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 33 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 139 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 174 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 235 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 236 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 224 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
SENATE BILL NO. 305
"An Act relating to the tax on oil and gas production;
and providing for an effective date."
9:22:29 AM
Co-Chair Stedman informed the committee about a new CS for
SB 305 and a new Senate Finance Committee zero fiscal note.
He said there was also a small technical amendment to the
new CS. He noted that public testimony had been previously
taken on the bill.
9:23:04 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT a CS for SB 305, labeled
26-LS1577\T, Bullock, 3/30/2010, as the version before the
committee.
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED.
9:23:34 AM
DON BULLOCK, ATTORNEY, LEGISLATIVE LEGAL SERVICES, reminded
the committee about the definition of production taxes and
lease expenditures. The production tax value of oil and gas
is what the tax is applied to. Starting with PPT and ACES,
the production tax value is basically the gross value at
the point of production minus allowable lease expenditures
under AS 43.55.165 adjusted under AS 43.55.170. Because the
lease expenditures are related to the production tax value,
whenever oil and gas are separated for tax purposes, lease
expenditures must be allocated. They are addressed in the
bill.
Mr. Bullock explained that currently the allocations are
required because of special provisions that relate to oil
and gas produced in Cook Inlet, as well as gas produced
outside of Cook Inlet and used in the state. The tax is
basically "25 percent plus". The 25 percent rate is applied
to the production tax value of all oil and gas. The "plus"
is a progressive tax that increases in rate as the
production tax value rises above $30. The main difference
between Version T and the previous version of the bill is
that the new version provides for a progressive tax on gas,
whereas the previous version just had a progressive tax on
oil.
Mr. Bullock pointed out that the title of the bill has been
amended to reflect the contents of Version T and is
narrowed to address the progressive rates.
9:25:51 AM
Mr. Bullock addressed the first section of the bill, which
amends AS 29.60.850(b), and did not appear previously in
Version P, the earlier version of the bill. It says that
money that is generated by the progressive taxes on oil and
gas is available for appropriation to the Community Revenue
Sharing Fund. The Fund was made for the purpose of making
community revenue sharing payments to municipalities,
reserves, and communities for public purposes. It is not a
dedicated fund, it merely identified money that is
available for appropriation.
Mr. Bullock explained that Section 2 amends AS
43.55.011(e), the main tax provision, to make separate
references to the monthly progressive taxes on oil and gas.
The progressive tax on oil, gas produced in Cook Inlet, and
gas produced elsewhere and used in the state are used to
determine the rate, which is the average amount of those
three values compared to $30. If that amount is greater
than $30, the rate is increased.
Mr. Bullock related that Section 3 Amends AS 43.55.011(g)
to have the tax rate determined using the production tax
values of oil and the production tax values on a BTU
equivalent basis of gas produced in Cook Inlet and gas
produced elsewhere and used in the state. Gas in and
outside of Cook Inlet are subject to caps on the tax. They
are considered "tax-favored production".
Mr. Bullock explained that Section 4 provides for a
progressive tax applicable to gas production that is not
included in AS 43.55.011(g) as amended in Section 3 of the
bill. It provides that the tax rate is applied to the
production tax value of a BTU equivalent of gas. There was
no counterpart to this section in the earlier version of
the bill. For both progressive taxes in (g) and (p), there
is no change in the range from which that tax rate is
determined.
9:28:55 AM
Mr. Bullock stressed that every time there is a change in
the tax scheme, there must be a corresponding change in the
installment payments. Section 5 amends AS 43.55.020(a) to
describe the determination of the amount of a monthly
installment. There is also a makeup payment at the end of
the year. The monthly payments should reflect one-twelfth
of the liability for the tax for the year.
Mr. Bullock said that Section 6 Amends AS 43.55.020(d)
relating to a settlement with the royalty owner, by adding
references to the production tax on gas. He emphasized that
the production tax values are what the tax rates are
applied to.
Mr. Bullock explained that Section 7 amends AS
43.55.160(a), relating to the determination of the
production tax value of oil and gas, by providing the means
for determining the production tax value of oil and the
production tax value of gas separately. It also reorders
some subparagraphs.
9:30:38 AM
Mr. Bullock noted that Section 7 in the prior version
amended the same section. This version provides for
determination of the value with reference to both oil and
gas.
Mr. Bullock informed the committee that Section 8 relates
to the allocation of lease expenditures between oil and
gas. Currently, the Department of Revenue has the authority
to make the allocation under AS 43.55.165(h). Section 8 of
Version T amends that section by requiring that the
Department of Revenue consider allocating lease
expenditures in proportion to the BTU equivalent barrels of
oil and gas produced from each lease or property. The
purpose is to provide a reasonable allocation of
expenditures between oil and gas. He explained how taxes
were on the gross value at the point of production prior to
PPT and ACES, which is now the starting point for
determining the production tax value. Since lease
expenditures are applied to the gross value at the point of
production to determine the production tax value, the
leases for oil and gas need to be allocated separately.
9:32:21 AM
Mr. Bullock spoke of Section 9 as being similar to the
provision in Section 8. This section adds a new subsection,
AS 43.55.170(d), which has to do with adjustments to lease
expenditures. It directs the Department of Revenue to
consider allocating adjustments based on the proportion of
the BTU equivalents of oil and gas produced.
Mr. Bullock turned to Section 11 which makes progressive
tax provisions in the bill retroactive to January 1, 2010.
There was no similar provision in the earlier bill. Because
of the retroactive effect and because installment payments
will be made after December 31 and before the effective
date, Section 10 requires that should there be an
installment payment, that underpayment would be made up at
the first installment payment due after the effective date.
Mr. Bullock concluded with Section 12 which makes the Act
take effect immediately.
9:33:58 AM
Mr. Bullock said there were some sections in the previous
version that don't have corresponding provisions in the
current bill. Sections 3, 4, and 8 in the previous version
are no longer needed.
9:35:08 AM
Senator Thomas asked if Section 4 is specific to producers
with production in both Prudhoe Bay and Cook Inlet. Mr.
Bullock clarified that the tax caps apply after the tax is
determined.
Senator Huggins referred to Section 8 and asked if there
was a separate effective date for the allocation of lease
expenditures for oil and gas. Mr. Bullock said the
department is required to have separate effective dates
now. Section 8 introduces a new provision which suggests
the department should consider allocating on a BTU-
equivalent basis.
ROGER MARKS, PETROLEUM CONSULTANT, LOGSDAN & ASSOCIATES,
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET & AUDIT, explained that the department
had the authority to adopt regulations for a cost
allocation method to implement the tax as it currently
works. The method the department adopted is the method in
Version T.
9:37:48 AM
Senator Egan asked about the sunset date of 2022 in Section
5, page 6, line 21. Mr. Bullock said the special tax breaks
for Cook Inlet gas and gas produced and used within the
state are applicable before 2022. Senator Egan understood
that the tax breaks go away in 2022.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION to adopting Version
T. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 1:
Page 9, line 29
Delete "oil produced during a month from"
Co-Chair Stedman OBJECTED.
Mr. Bullock explained that the amendment corrects an
oversight made when drafting the bill. It removes
extraneous language.
Co-Chair Stedman WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, Amendment 1 was adopted.
9:40:32 AM
Senator Olson asked about the distinction between Cook
Inlet gas and other gas fields above the 68th parallel. He
wondered if the Nenana gas field was included. Mr. Bullock
responded that the law applies to all gas and oil produced
in the state. The special provisions are narrowly focused
on gas and oil produced in Cook Inlet and gas produced
outside of Cook Inlet and used in the state. Senator Olson
commented that those who live above the 68th parallel "feel
like a stepchild".
9:41:55 AM
Mr. Marks explained the fiscal note by discussing some of
the technical changes made in the bill. He related that two
progressivity buckets have been established. One represents
current oil and gas activity, and the other bucket is
export gas. The progressivity surcharges for oil and Cook
Inlet and in-state gas would be calculated together. If the
two were to be separated, progressivity on oil would
increase and there would be a tax increase, which is not
the intent of the bill. There was a concern about keeping
the bill revenue neutral.
Mr. Marks pointed out that in the previous version of the
bill there was some discussion of a credit for the
difference between the taxes calculated after the bill
passed and before. That was deemed to be cumbersome, so the
two buckets were rated for progressivity. No current
activity would see a tax increase. Export gas would not
dilute the oil progressivity factor. The Department of
Revenue fiscal note is a zero note because of the changed
progressivity structure.
Co-Chair Stedman added that it would simplify the process
so the industry does not have to do two sets of
calculations. Mr. Marks said that was correct.
9:46:24 AM
Senator Huggins asked if progressivity on gas in this bill
is the same as it currently is. Mr. Marks concurred.
9:47:01 AM
Co-Chair Hoffman MOVED to report CSSB 305 (FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
CSSB 305 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee, as amended,
with a "do pass" recommendation and with a new fiscal note
by the Senate Finance Committee for the Department of
Revenue.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| Explanation of Changes for Senate Bill 33.doc |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| FNSB_SB_33_Resolution.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| FNSB_SB_33_Resolution.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| Res2462-support_HB94_SB33_re_scholarships.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
HB 94 SB 33 |
| SB33 Report Card.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| SB 33 Letter ACDE.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| SB 33 Sectional.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| SB 33 Sponsor Statement.doc |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| Taylor Plan Endorsement.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| testimony Fabian Philipp.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| University Memo Senator Ellis SB33 .doc |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| SB 139 Letters of Support 032510.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB 139 Written Testimony Myers.doc |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM SFIN 4/1/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB 139 Data Health Care Professions Loan Repayment Program Concept Proposal.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Sponsor Statement.doc |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Paskvan Response 4-1-09.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 News Article ADN 121609.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Data 3 AHWV Study.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Data 2 UA_RS14.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Data 1 HPSA_MUA.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 ADN Articles.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Data 4 MedCare_2004_StateProgsOutcomes.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Data 6 Chart from Dr Pathman.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Data 7 JAMA_2000_StateServicePrograms.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB 33 Proposed CS Version W SFIN 033110.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| SB305 Sectional Summary CSSB v. T.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| SB 305 Proposed CS 033110 Version T.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| SB 305 2010 03 31 FN CSSB305 SFIN.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| SB 305 Amendmetn 1 SFIN 033110 T.1.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 305 |
| SB 33 Additional backup 033110 SFIN.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 33 |
| SB139CS Version N.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139 Explanation of Changes in the CS Version N.PDF |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |
| SB139CS(HSS)-DHSS-MAA -03-29-10.pdf |
SFIN 3/31/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 139 |