Legislature(2009 - 2010)HOUSE FINANCE 519
04/12/2010 08:00 AM House FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB294 | |
| HB412 | |
| HB283 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | HB 294 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 410 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 300 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 412 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 301 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 283 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 126 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
HOUSE FINANCE COMMITTEE
April 12, 2010
8:15 a.m.
8:15:52 AM
CALL TO ORDER
Co-Chair Stoltze called the House Finance Committee meeting
to order at 8:15 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Mike Hawker, Co-Chair
Representative Bill Stoltze, Co-Chair
Representative Bill Thomas Jr., Vice-Chair
Representative Allan Austerman
Representative Mike Doogan
Representative Anna Fairclough
Representative Neal Foster
Representative Les Gara
Representative Reggie Joule
Representative Mike Kelly
Representative Woodie Salmon
MEMBERS ABSENT
None
ALSO PRESENT
Representative Mark Neuman; Captain John Kenyon, Chief of
Prevention Division, District 17, Juneau, US Coast Guard;
Greg Winegar, Division of Investments, Department of
Commerce; Representative Harry Crawford; Diane Casto,
Project Manager, Department of Health and Social Services.
PRESENT VIA TELECONFERENCE
Shirley Gifford, Alcohol Board; Kerry Hennings, Drivers
License Manager, Driver Services, Division of Motor
Vehicles.
SUMMARY
HB 126 FOSTER CARE/CINA/EDUCATION OF HOMELESS
HB 126 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.
HB 283 PURCHASE/CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL
HB 283 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for
further consideration.
HB 294 USE, REGULATION, AND OPERATION OF BOATS
CS HB 294 (FIN) was REPORTED out of
Committee with a "do pass" recommendation
and with previously published fiscal note:
FN1 (DNR)
HB 410 AIDEA LOANS
HB 410 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.
HB 412 MICROLOAN REVOLVING FUND
CS HB 412(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee
with no recommendations and with previously
published fiscal note: FN1 (CED)
8:16:00 AM
HOUSE BILL NO. 294
"An Act amending the termination date of certain
statutes relating to the use, operation, and
regulation of boats, a uniform state waterway marking
system, and civil liability for boat owners; providing
for an effective date by amending the effective date
of secs. 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16, 18, 20, 23, 26, and
27, ch. 28, SLA 2000, as amended; and providing for an
effective date."
8:17:58 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED CS HB 294(FIN), 26-LS1282\E as a
working document.
Co-Chair Stoltze OBJECTED for the purpose of discussion.
REPRESENTATIVE MARK NEUMAN presented an overview of the
bill. He noted that he worked closely with the United
States Coast Guard on the legislation, which includes the
Kids Don't Float program.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked if the bill remains unchanged and HB
294 merely extends the sunset. Representative Neuman
concurred.
8:19:07 AM
CAPTAIN JOHN KENYON, CHIEF OF PREVENTION DIVISION, DISTRICT
17, JUNEAU, US COAST GUARD discussed the recreational
boating safety program. The goal of the program is to
encourage boating safety and education in the state. The
program distributes funding for the safety program. The
program produces educated boat owners. In 2009, 12 Alaskans
lost lives, which is the lowest number since inception of
the program. The program saves lives and promotes safe use
of the waters.
Co-Chair Stoltze stated appreciation for the Coast Guard
and their work on the bill. He stressed the lack of
controversy regarding the Kids Don't Float program or the
Coast Guard.
8:24:11 AM
Co-Chair Stoltze WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
further OBJECTION, CS HB 294(FIN), 26-LS1282\E was adopted
as a working document.
Co-Chair Stoltze spoke to the fiscal notes and the impacts.
Vice-Chair Thomas MOVED to report CS HB 294(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
CS HB 294 (FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with previously published fiscal
note: FN1 (DNR)
8:25:56 AM
HOUSE BILL NO. 412
"An Act establishing the Alaska microloan revolving
fund; making loans for commercial purposes from the
fund; and relating to the fund and loans; and
providing for an effective date."
GREG WINEGAR, DIVISION OF INVESTMENTS, DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE spoke to the bill. The loan program is modeled
after a similar program sponsored by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) currently available in 46 states.
Alaska has yet to develop a comparable loan program as an
intermediary lender is currently unidentified. The loans
would include up to $35,000 for an individual and $70,000
for two or more residents. The proceeds would be available
for working capital, equipment, construction, and
improvements. The interest rate would be prime plus one
with a floor of six and a ceiling of eight. The maximum
term is six years. The submitted fiscal note includes $3.5
million from Alaska Industrial Development and Export
Authority (AIDEA) contingent on the passage of HB 411. The
fund would be established as a revolving fund. With the
initial capitalization, 75 loans are possible in the first
year and 100 in the second, with 25 loans per year on an
ongoing basis thereafter.
8:28:32 AM
Representative Fairclough asked about time constraints for
residency requirements listed on Page 3, Line 14-16. Mr.
Winegar responded that the requirements span a 12
consecutive month period. Representative Fairclough
interpreted the section differently. Mr. Winegar suggested
a language change to better communicate the 12 month time
period.
Vice-Chair Thomas recalled multiple definitions of
residency.
8:30:32 AM
Representative Doogan believed Representative Fairclough
was right. He provided three different definitions of
residency.
Representative Gara suggested a conceptual amendment
imposing the one year period used for the Permanent Fund
Dividend (PFD).
Representative Fairclough clarified that the bill states
that a person may not have declared residency elsewhere.
She noted that people migrate to Alaska occasionally
seeking business loans.
Vice-Chair Thomas stated that the definition of residency
at the university is similar to that of the PFD
requirement.
8:33:16 AM
Representative Doogan commented that the agency must
understand the expectation of a clarifying amendment. Mr.
Winegar offered to communicate with the agency.
Representative Fairclough stressed a time commitment.
Representative Kelly requested a list of others concerned
with the bill. Mr. Winegar responded that discussions with
multiple banks did not result in much concern regarding the
lower dollar level.
8:35:48 AM
Representative Gara asked about the eight percent cap. Mr.
Winegar agreed that the cap could be removed. He explained
the goal of maintaining a low interest rate.
Representative Gara MOVED Conceptual Amendment 1.
Page 3, line 26, delete after per year:
"and not more than eight percent per year;"
Representative Austerman OBJECTED for discussion. He
discussed the establishment of acceptable interest rates
for these loans.
Mr. Winegar stated that the prime rate is three and one
quarter so prime plus one would be four and one quarter
with a basement of six. If prime plus one went higher than
eight percent, then eight percent would be the cap.
Representative Doogan understood that if the prime rate was
three and one half or four and one half, a loan is not
possible because the number is less than six.
Mr. Winegar explained that the language reads prime plus
one with a floor of six percent.
Representative Doogan understood the intention of the
amendment yet was not clear on the purpose. If the prime
rate is four and one half plus one, why would the loan be
at six percent? Mr. Winegar responded that six was the
decision for the floor as risk and cost must be factored
in.
8:40:15 AM
Representative Austerman continued to object to the
amendment. He believed that the reason for the loan was the
fostering of economic development. He stated that a higher
interest rate makes it more difficult to pay back the loan.
He opined that an eight percent cap with a $35 thousand
loan allows a wonderful opportunity for the business
sector.
Representative Kelly believed that the committee discussed
the topic in a prior meeting. Mr. Winegar agreed.
Representative Kelly stated that he does not support the
eight percent cap. The intention of the loans is not to
compete with the banks. He understood the floor, as the
loans are often offered to those unable to receive
traditional bank loans.
Representative Foster asked if the cost of capital rises
above eight percent, would AIDEA subsidize the loans. Mr.
Winegar explained that an opportunity cost would have been
lost because the fund is revolving. The money returned is
the interest rate for any given time.
8:43:40 AM
Representative Gara commented that prime plus one is a
favorable interest rate regardless of prime. Mr. Winegar
agreed.
Representative Fairclough asked if the issued loans are on
a fixed versus adjustable rate. Mr. Winegar answered yes.
Representative Fairclough advocated in support of the
amendment on the floor to eliminate the eight percent
ability to draw down. She opined that offering loans
substantially below the market value is unfair to the
private sector.
Representative Doogan understood the range of loans would
exist between 6 and 8 percent with the current language in
the CS. Mr. Winegar replied yes. He explained that rates
are reviewed each quarter and adjusted to create loans on a
fixed rate note for the life of the loan.
Representative Doogan continued that the amendment would
create a rate between six and infinity. He asked if the
legislature would make the change to allow the interest
rate to float up why is the committee concerned about loans
where interest rate floats down. Mr. Winegar responded risk
and operating costs.
8:46:53 AM
Representative Doogan expressed confusion. He believed that
if the interest was lower, the risk was lower. He opined
that the risk calculation was backwards.
Mr. Winegar agreed that six percent may not be the correct
number. Adding one point to three and one quarter percent
is a very low interest rate when cost and risk are factored
in.
Representative Doogan commented that loans for low interest
rates lead to eventual balance. Mr. Winegar explained that
money is required to operate the program and losses do
occur leading to the decision for a moderate interest rate.
8:50:08 AM
Representative Austerman delivered an explanation of the
necessity of interest rates with state or bank loans. Those
loan recipients who make their payments balance those who
cannot, allowing for cash flow.
Representative Doogan understood that the amendment would
allow the state to provide bank luxuries at the low end but
not at the high end.
Representative Austerman reminded about the revolving loan
program. If the operational cost is covered at six percent
there is no need to increase.
Representative Kelly asked if six percent provided a good
rate. Mr. Winegar replied yes.
Representative Kelly asked if lowering the percentage would
compete with banks. He advocated for six percent and
removal of the cap.
8:52:58 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas reminded that the interest rate was 23
percent in the 1980s. He was in support of the eight
percent cap.
Representative Foster stated that his concern was in the
state adopting bank like policies. He asked about the
interest rate structure with the SBA microloan. Mr. Winegar
noted research showing rates at eight percent for SBA in
the lower forty eight.
Representative Foster asked about a cap in the other loans.
Mr. Winegar believed no, but he was unfamiliar with every
plan.
8:54:49 AM
Representative Gara requested that AIDEA consider the issue
and contact the committee with an answer by the end of the
day. He stressed that he understood both sides of the
argument.
Vice-Chair Thomas recalled the time constraints.
Representative Fairclough suggested a vote on the
amendment.
Representative Austerman pointed out that the major banks
are not interested in these loans. The objective of the
microloan program is to help people who cannot receive
traditional bank loans. He stated opposition to the
amendment.
Representative Kelly asked if interest rates are fifteen
percent and the state is loaning at eight percent, what
would happen to the value of the corpus. Mr. Winegar
responded that the corpus of the fund will continue to
grow.
Representative Kelly asked if the growth would continue
with a differential between inflation of three percent. Mr.
Winegar responded that the opportunity cost would be lost.
Representative Kelly commented that with inflation of 12
percent, the value of the corpus would decrease by 50
percent.
Mr. Winegar added that the fund might earn more without the
restriction of eight percent.
Representative Kelly wondered if the fund would depreciate
in real value. Mr. Winegar agreed that when the situation
is compared to the opportunity cost, the fund would
depreciate.
8:59:05 AM
Representative Fairclough stated support of the amendment
because she wanted to prevent the opportunity for citizens
to borrow money for reinvestment at a higher rate
elsewhere. Vice-Chair Thomas agreed.
9:00:03 AM AT EASE
9:01:08 AM RECONVENED
Vice-Chair Thomas restated the amendment.
Representative Fairclough commented on the amendment and
the discussion that lifting the cap would open up
competition with the banking industry so that people would
not access the microloan account and place it in another
financial institution to receive a larger rate of return.
Representative Austerman continued to oppose the amendment
because of the plea from small businesses expressing
difficulty achieving equipment and inventory loans.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Fairclough, Foster, Gara, Joule, Kelly, Salmon,
Doogan
OPPOSED: Thomas, Austerman, Stoltze, Hawker
The MOTION PASSED (7-4).
9:05:15 AM
Representative Fairclough MOVED Conceptual Amendment #2
Page 3, line 17, add after "state,"
"in the previous 12 months."
Representative Gara OBJECTED for discussion.
She explained the amendment which would define the time
limit established in the bill.
Representative Gara WITHDREW his OBJECTION to Conceptual
Amendment #2. There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Representative Doogan MOVED Conceptual Amendment #3.
Page 3, line 25 delete after "point"
"but interest may not be less than six percent
per year"
Representative Austerman OBJECTED for discussion.
Representative Doogan explained that because the cap was
raised with the theory that costs will rise, this amendment
would account for the possibility that costs might
decrease. He understood that the interest rate created by
the amendment would be four and one half percent. The
borrowers would receive the same benefit from a lower rate
that they might receive as a penalty from higher rates.
9:09:30 AM
Representative Fairclough spoke in opposition to the
amendment. She mentioned the risk to the revolving loan
account as the interest collected must be measured against
the risk of potential default.
9:10:34 AM
Representative Austerman objected because he felt that six
percent protects the risk aspect.
Representative Gara stated that protection is offered in
charging a prime plus one interest rate. He understood the
need for a minimum floor, and the negotiable nature of it.
He asked if harm would occur if the minimum floor was five
percent.
Mr. Winegar responded that the proposed scenario would
increase the risk slightly. He pointed out that prime is
the amount loaned to banks from other banks. Prime plus one
is an attractive rate in terms of risk.
9:12:47 AM AT EASE
9:13:56 AM RECONVENED
Representative Doogan restated the Conceptual amendment #3.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Foster, Gara, Doogan,
OPPOSED: Joule, Kelly, Salmon, Thomas, Austerman,
Fairclough, Hawker, Stoltze
The MOTION FAILED (3-8).
9:15:49 AM
Co-Chair Hawker MOVED to ADOPT Conceptual Amendment #4.
Page 1, lines 5-12, Remove Section 1
Representative Gara OBJECTED for discussion. Co-Chair
Hawker explained that the conceptual amendment entails the
ability of the drafters to incorporate it into the entire
context of the bill.
Representative Gara WITHDREW his OBJECTION. There being NO
OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
Co-Chair Stoltze MOVED to report CS HB 412(FIN) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
CS HB 412(FIN) was REPORTED out of Committee with no
recommendations and with previously published fiscal
note: FN1 (CED)
9:17:39 AM AT EASE
9:18:35 AM RECONVENED
HOUSE BILL NO. 283
"An Act relating to the purchasing of and restrictions
concerning alcoholic beverages."
REPRESENTATIVE HARRY CRAWFORD spoke to the reasoning behind
the bill. He believed that prevention is crucial regarding
alcohol related crimes. The bill is directed at identifying
those individuals that cannot handle alcohol. The bill
restricts a person who commits a felony from purchasing
alcohol. The bill also restricts a third misdemeanor
directly or indirectly caused by the consumption of alcohol
and prohibits the purchase alcohol from a person who is
restricted or has a youth driver's license or
identification.
9:23:20 AM
Co-Chair Hawker expressed issues with recent amendments to
the bill, particularly Sections 4 and 5. He asked if the
sections were added to the original bill. Representative
Crawford replied yes.
Co-Chair Hawker stated that Section 5 bothers him because
an Alaska citizen turning 21 years of age with a valid
driver's license is unable to purchase alcohol until he or
she obtains a new license. He pointed out Section 4, which
is in existing statute. He wished to remove the section
from statute.
9:25:53 AM
Representative Crawford commented that the operative word
is "may" as people will occasionally buy alcohol with their
passport because they have the red mark on the license. The
red mark indicates alcohol restriction. He explained that a
person can drive with a vertical (junior) license following
their 21st birthday, but cannot buy alcohol with it.
Co-Chair Hawker recalled certain times in the nation's
history where different views regarding equity were
observed. He observed insult when a young person returns to
Alaska after serving their country in Afghanistan and is
unable to purchase alcohol without renewing his driver's
license.
9:31:09 AM
Representative Joule echoed Co-Chair Hawker's point of
view. In small communities, one lacks the ability to renew
their driver's license without a local Division of Motor
Vehicle (DMV) office.
Representative Austerman shared the concerns of Co-Chair
Hawker. He opined that a law mandating the presentation of
state identification indicating a potential alcohol problem
may be more effective. He compared his solution to a
"filtration system" for those with known problems with
alcohol. He appreciated the efforts of Representative
Crawford.
9:34:23 AM
Representative Crawford stated that these two sections were
a high priority for the industry. Currently an alcohol
restricted driver's license has red stripe. He spoke of
recent contact with a woman who voluntarily deemed herself
alcohol restricted with a red mark on her license as she
could not control her drinking and believed that this tool
would help her. He realized that prohibition of alcohol did
not work, but another tool is necessary for those people
who have proven that they cannot handle alcohol.
9:37:51 AM
Representative Gara stated that the bill makes it illegal
to use another person's identification to buy alcohol. He
opined that Section 4 and 5 make the bill more effective
and balanced.
9:40:08 AM
Vice-Chair Thomas applauded the bill's merits. He shared a
personal story regarding lack of identification upon
discharge from the military. He echoed the concerns of
Representative Joule as his district was also rural and
lacking in DMV offices. He expressed sympathy for the
military and the rural portion affected by the bill as
written.
9:43:09 AM
Representative Crawford provided a personal story regarding
lack of alcohol service without proper identification. He
understood that the law can occasionally create
inconveniences, but the overall benefits of this bill would
outweigh them. He suggested that military identification
would suffice for the purchase of alcohol, but he did not
advocate for use of a passport as proper identification
when purchasing alcohol.
9:45:40 AM
Representative Foster echoed the concerns expressed by
Representative Joule.
Representative Crawford stated that the industry of package
stores in Anchorage requested that a person with a vertical
picture on their license be unable to purchase alcohol.
9:47:47 AM
Co-Chair Hawker pointed out that the amendment as drafted
will remove the "illiterate bartender provision." He
continued that Section 4 is existing statute and will
remain unaffected by the amendment.
Co-Chair Stoltze clarified that bartenders often have a
wide variety of education levels. He asked the Alcohol
Board about requirements for package stores regarding
identification and alcohol.
SHIRLEY GIFFORD, ALCOHOL BOARD (via teleconference) stated
that clarification in the bill will prove helpful regarding
requirements. She stressed that she was not available to
oppose the bill, but instead to answer questions.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked if the current law prevents a
package store from requiring an Alaskan driver's license.
Ms. Gifford responded yes, beverage dispensaries, package
stores, and restaurants set their own policies. The
establishments can refuse service to anyone. Licensed
establishments tend to protect themselves from potential
liability.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked if an establishment could create
policy for acceptance or not of military identification.
Ms. Gifford understood that the licensees can refuse
service to any person.
9:55:01 AM
Representative Kelly asked if Section 5 was removed, would
the ability to force the training program under the new
license be lost. Representative Crawford responded that a
person seeking their license must take the training
program.
Representative Austerman asked if the time frame comprised
of a 90 day period. Representative Crawford clarified that
a person has 90 days to renew their license following their
21st birthday.
9:57:22 AM
Representative Foster revisited the passport issue. He
communicated that village DMVs sometimes close for weeks at
a time and the hours are often restricted. He opined that
the use of a passport would be helpful in that situation.
Co-Chair Stoltze CLOSED public testimony.
9:58:58 AM
Co-Chair Hawker moved Amendment #1:
Page 2, line 12 through line 29
Delete all material
Renumber following sections accordingly.
Representative Gara OBJECTED for discussion.
Co-Chair Hawker explained that the amendment removes the
discriminatory provision of a person who has reached the
age of 21 without the opportunity to visit a DMV office for
reissuance of a new driver's license. The amendment does
not alter existing statute.
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.
IN FAVOR: Joule, Salmon, Thomas, Austerman, Fairclough,
Foster, Stoltze, Hawker
OPPOSED: Gara, Doogan
The MOTION PASSED (8-2).
Amendment 2 was adopted.
Co-Chair Stoltze addressed the fiscal notes from DMV, and
the Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS).
10:02:06 AM
DIANE CASTO, PROJECT MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
SOCIAL SERVICES explained the fiscal notes. She stated that
very little enforcement of the red striped licenses occurs.
The Alcohol Safety Action program works with misdemeanant
alcohol offenses. With the bill, increased enforcement
leads to increased probation violations. A probation
violation leads to additional monitoring including regular
urinalysis testing requiring an increase in staff.
Co-Chair Stoltze asked if the amendment has an impact on
the fiscal note. Ms. Casto replied no.
Co-Chair Hawker expressed concern about the zero nature of
DMV's fiscal note as it creates a net of $2 million state
revenue.
KERRY HENNINGS, DRIVERS LICENSE MANAGER, DRIVER SERVICES,
DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES (via teleconference) agreed that
the change was positive.
Co-Chair Hawker asked about the fiscal note prepared
January 26, 2010 which reflects the additional charge for
alcohol restricted licenses with the agency estimating
40,000 additional licenses each year. Ms. Hennings
apologized as she was not prepared to answer the question.
Representative Crawford possessed a different fiscal note
from DMV stating expenses of $17,500 with a change in
revenue of $50 thousand.
10:07:01 AM
Representative Austerman requested committee review of the
new fiscal note. He asked if the amendment affects the
fiscal note for DMV. Ms. Casto repeated that the amendment
does not change the fiscal note. Ms. Hennings added that
the amendment does not change the fiscal note for DMV
either.
Representative Crawford stated that the fiscal note from
DHSS was created before the last committee where the
increase of the fine from $1000 to $2000 was amended out.
The former proposal would have increased enforcement.
HOUSE BILL NO. 410
"An Act relating to loan participations and
development finance projects of the Alaska Industrial
Development and Export Authority; and relating to
loans from the rural development initiative fund."
HB 410 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.
HOUSE BILL NO. 126
"An Act relating to continuing the secondary public
education of a homeless student; relating to the
purpose of certain laws as they relate to children;
relating to tuition waivers, loans, and medical
assistance for a child placed in out-of-home care by
the state; relating to foster care; relating to
children in need of aid; relating to foster care
transition to independent living; and relating to
juvenile programs and institutions."
HB 126 was SCHEDULED but not HEARD.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:09 AM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 2 HB 294 sponsor statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
| 4 HB 294 Sectional Analysis version R.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
| 5 Alaska's Boating Safety Dollars at Work 2010.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 294 |
| admin@aidea org_20100401_145122.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
|
| Letter from Governor HB410.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 410 |
| Sectional Analysis HB410.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 410 |
| HB 412 Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 412 |
| HB 412 Support Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 412 |
| HB 412 Transmittal Letter.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 412 |
| Micro loans.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 412 |
| Microloan Support Letters.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 412 |
| HB283CS(JUD)-LAW-CRIM-03-05-10NEW.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 283 |
| Sectional for CS.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 283 |
| Sponsor Statement HB 283 (2) CS.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 283 |
| Sponsor Statement HB 283 (2) CS.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 283 |
| Backup for (H)FIN hearing request.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
|
| CASA letter of support.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
|
| CSHB 126(FIN) workdraft - Summary of Changes from HB 126 (HSS).doc |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| CSHB 126(HSS) Sectional Analysis.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| CSHB 126(HSS) Sponsor Statement.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| CSHB 126(HSS) Summary of Changes from HB 126.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| FFCA letter of support.pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
|
| HB 126 Backup[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| HB 126 Departments Affected[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| new HB 126 material including new fiscal notes[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
HB 126 |
| SB300SupplementalBackup[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
SB 300 |
| SB300SectionalAnalysis[1].pdf |
HFIN 4/12/2010 8:00:00 AM |
SB 300 |