Legislature(2007 - 2008)
04/07/2008 02:53 PM House FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB230 | |
| SB260 | |
| SB285 | |
| SB185 |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 285(FIN)
An Act relating to the power and duties of the
Department of Education and Early Development for
improving instructional practices in school districts;
and providing for an effective date.
3:47:28 PM
SENATOR GARY STEVENS, SPONSOR, explained that the bill was
introduced in response to the court case decision of Moore
et. al. vs. State of Alaska, which pertains to the
Legislature fulfilling its constitutional mandate of
overseeing school districts and schools in Alaska. The case
concludes in part that the Legislature is failing this duty
as regards schools with long-standing poor performance.
Senator Stevens said the bill calls for the Department of
Education and Early Development (DEED) to provide direction
to schools that need to increase student achievement,
including making decisions regarding personnel and
expenditures to improve instructional practices.
Representative Hawker stated his support of the bill and
recommended reading Moore vs. State for understanding
education issues.
Vice-Chair Stoltze asked a question about athletic coaches.
Senator Stevens clarified that academic coaches would be
hired to help improve scores.
TIM LAMKIN, STAFF, SENATOR GARY STEVENS, added that it is
not the intent of the bill to have anything to do with
sports coaches.
3:52:26 PM
Co-Chair Chenault OPENED PUBLIC TESTIMONY.
EDDY JEANS, DIRECTOR, SCHOOL FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, stated the Department's
support for the legislation.
Representative Crawford asked for a description of how the
legislation would change things.
Mr. Jeans answered that the legislation provides
clarification in statute that DEED as the Legislature's
agent has the authority to intervene and provide supervision
over school districts. One of the judge's criticisms of the
State during the lawsuit was that utilizing the No Child
Left Behind model, it takes too long for the State to
intervene.
3:55:05 PM
Representative Hawker asked if DEED would intervene at the
individual school level or at the district level when a
school is identified as needing intervention,. Mr. Jeans
answered that the legislation covers both district and
school levels, but all interventions would be through the
district administration, working with the local school
board. The Department would not go directly into a school.
PUBLIC TESTIMONY CLOSED.
Co-Chair Meyer referred to the fiscal note.
Vice-Chair Stoltze MOVED to REPORT HCS CSSB 285(HES) out of
Committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note. There being NO OBJECTION, it was
so ordered.
HCS CSSB 285(HES) was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do
pass" recommendation and with attached fiscal note #1 by the
Department of Education and Early Development and Senate
Letter of Intent.
AT EASE 3:57:45 PM
RECONVENE 7:57:13 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|