Legislature(2009 - 2010)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/08/2010 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB209 | |
| SB260 | |
| HB6|| SB214 | |
| SB202 | |
| SB284 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | SB 209 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 260 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | SB 202 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 284 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| = | SB 214 | ||
| = | HB 6 | ||
SB 284-CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES
2:54:16 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 284. He related
that it is a judiciary committee bill and is in response to the
recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that opens what some feel are
the floodgates with respect to independent expenditures for and
against candidates. Because Alaska has had a complete ban on
corporate spending in elections, the statutes are largely silent
with respect to whether a corporation reports and how it
discloses expenditures.
He described sections 2 and 4 as the meat of bill. Section 4
deals with disclosures to APOC about expenditures that have been
made for and against a candidate. Section 11 deals with
disclaimers or placing words in the advertisements to tell the
public who is paying for the communication.
2:56:03 PM
SENATOR COGHILL said he likes many things in the bill, but he'd
like to challenge some. He asked if the best way to do that is
by an amendment.
CHAIR FRENCH said yes. He noted that Mr. Bullard, the drafter,
Mr. Ptacin with the Department of Law, and Ms. Hill with the
Alaska Public Offices Commission were available to answer
questions. He opened public testimony.
2:56:39 PM
MATT WALLACE, Executive Director, Alaska Public Interest
Research Group (AKPIRG), stated support for SB 284. He said that
although the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision didn't invent
the problem of big money influence in politics, it did make the
problem worse by opening the floodgates for independent
expenditures in elections. Ultimately, aggressive federal action
may be needed to address the systemic problems in campaign
finance and big money influence, he opined. We at AKPIRG
certainly think there is a lot that can be done at the state and
federal level to mitigate the influence of the decision, he
said. SB 284 is a piece of much-needed legislation that would
help to mitigate unlimited corporate and union spending in
elections.
MR. WALLACE said AKPIRG is particularly pleased that the bill
requires significant disclaimers for independent expenditures in
campaign ads. Where many are familiar with the negative
political ads that are paid for by an innocuous sounding front-
group, the bill notably would require that the top five
contributors for those front groups be disclosed. This is in
addition to the very laudable reporting requirements that are
also included in the legislation, he said.
2:59:15 PM
MARILYN RUSSELL, President, League of Women Voters (LWV) of
Alaska, said the league supports SB 284 because it believes that
the goals of the campaign system should be:
1. To ensure the public's right to know;
2. To combat corruption and undue influence;
3. To enable candidates to compete more equitably for public
office; and
4. To promote citizen participation in the political process.
Polls show that 8 of 10 support disclosure and disclaimer.
MS. RUSSELL reported that the League of Women Voters filed a
brief in support of the provisions in McCain Feingold to
restrict corporate participation in elections and was
disappointed in the recent court decision. In light of the
decision, it is vital to amend Alaska's campaign laws to require
full disclosure of campaign contributions by corporations and
labor unions because they aren't covered under the state's
existing disclosure and disclaimer laws. The league has long
supported public disclosure of campaign contributions of money,
goods, and services believing that citizens should know who is
spending money supporting or opposing candidates and ballot
issues. This information should be part of the communication
itself like all other campaign communications. Alaska's
reporting laws simply must be amended before the upcoming
primary election, she concluded.
CHAIR FRENCH closed public testimony and announced he would hold
SB 284 in committee for further work.
3:02:07 PM
There being no further business to come before the committee,
Chair French adjourned the meeting at 3:02 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB284 Sponsor Statement.doc |
SJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 284 |
| Sectional Analysis SB 284.PDF |
SJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 284 |
| SB202 Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SJUD 3/8/2010 1:30:00 PM |
SB 202 |