Legislature(1995 - 1996)
04/03/1996 02:05 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 280(CRA)
"An Act relating to the mandatory incorporation of
certain boroughs in the unorganized borough."
Co-chairman Halford continued SB 280. Senator Torgerson was
invited to join the committee. He referred to section
29.05.031 there is a prohibition against starting third-
class boroughs. This amendment would basically delete that
out of the statutes so the statute and SB 280 would not be
contradictory. Senator Phillips moved amendment #3 and
without objection it was adopted. Senator Rieger moved his
re-drafted amendment #2 and said the changes were to change
"3%" to "5%" and delete "250 residents or". He referred to
proposed borough number three and said they were not part of
the municipality of Ketchikan. If they were they would have
to have a larger threshold. Co-chairman Halford said this
posed a problem. Senator Rieger said a large enough
percentage was wanted so the detachment petitions are not a
dime a dozen; on the other hand it should be small enough to
allow self-determination. He said eventually there would be
a vote. Of the area that constituted the 5%+ at least 15%
of the people within that area who voted in the last
election must sign a petition to put it on the next ballot.
Then residents of the area proposed for detachment were
eligible to vote. Senator Torgerson said Senator Zharoff
would have been better off with the 250 standard than in the
3% in his example. As Senator Rieger pointed out,
annexation is not before the committee. Senator Frank felt
the amendment was not germane to the issue. Getting into
the detachment issue would cause a need for the committee to
gather more information. That would need another bill and
more discussion not just an attachment or amendment to this
bill. He said he would support the bill as it came into the
committee but that he was uncomfortable with the detachment
issues. Senator Rieger explained why he thought the issue
was germane. If mandatory corporations are going to be
proposed they have to be balanced with self-determination
abilities. Co-chairman Halford concurred. Senator Frank
said he knew the issue was germane legally but did not feel
it was germane from a political point of view. Senator
Phillips concurred with Senator Rieger. He asked about the
Lake Louise detachment.
Lamar Cotten, Department of Community and Regional Affairs
was invited to join the committee. He said the permanent
residents of Lake Louise filed a petition to detach. They
were not allowed to vote. He said that the LBC staff had
not really gone through this but the commission does have
broad authority. Senator Halford said in would require
another education process to understand the detachment
question. He asked what would happen if the detachment
process in Senator Rieger's amendment were to be
implemented. Mr. Cotten said this matter had not really
been investigated. He explained there was a series of nine
standards the LBC looked at when it comes to detachment in
order to make a decision. There have been eleven petitions
to detach that have been accepted. Six have actually been
accepted. Co-chairman Halford asked if they could guarantee
access by petition that would result in a vote based on some
threshold. He referred to Eagle River and Anchorage in that
they had been continuously turned down by the local boundary
commission. The legislature passed, by a significant
margin, legislation to specifically let the community
separate. After the separation and after there was no vote
available on the unification charter, the community was
reunited by Court order because the legislation was special
legislation and the Court said the boundary commission could
have done this. That, in terms of population, was probably
the biggest boundary issue since statehood. Mr. Cotten
said that he and his staff would be willing to meet with
committee members and go through this matter.
Senator Rieger commented and said LBC could consider all
petitions that are submitted and use their own judgment on
what they allow or do not allow. A municipality may
initiate a detachment on their own but that is through
action of the local governing body which oftentimes is the
problem. Mr. Cotten felt further review of the matter was
necessary. Senator Torgerson said it would be better to
hold the bill until tomorrow pending his further
investigation.
Co-chairman Halford said he would hold the bill in committee
until tomorrow pending further investigation and receipt of
new draft CS.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|