Legislature(1997 - 1998)
02/10/1998 03:37 PM Senate STA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
Number 142
SB 275 - FUND RAISING: GOV; LT. GOV; & CANDIDATES
CHAIRMAN GREEN brought introduced SB 275 as the next order of
business. There was a proposed draft committee substitute before
the committee for its consideration.
SENATOR WARD moved the adoption of CSSB 275(STA), version "H".
Hearing no objection, the motion carried.
PORTIA PARKER, a legislative aide to Senator Mike Miller who is the
prime sponsor of SB 275, outlined the differences between the
original bill and the draft committee substitute.
In the original bill the change was conformed to current law, which
in AS 15.13.072 separates member of the legislature and legislative
staff but does not cover the governor, lieutenant governor, or
candidates for governor or lieutenant in 074. It gets everyone
under the same campaign financing rules, same restrictions, and
same prohibitions during legislative session, special sessions, and
for candidates during regular legislative sessions. The committee
substitute cleans up the language in the statute so that any
candidate, whether an incumbent or a challenger is under the same
restrictions and rules for campaign fund raising, soliciting and
accepting contributions during regular sessions and special
sessions.
Ms. Parker said there is an exception in the legislation for the 90
days immediately preceding a state election. She explained the
reasoning for the exception is in the case where the legislature is
called into special session two weeks before an election. The only
time that there would be an exception to the ban on fund raising
during any session, whether a regular session or a special session,
would be when it is at least 90 days immediately preceding a state
election.
SENATOR WARD asked if there was any consideration given in the
committee substitute for that time period where the legislature has
adjourned but the governor still has the ability to veto and stop
a piece of legislation completely. SENATOR MILLER acknowledged
that it was discussed, but he pointed out that there have been some
instances where bills have not been transmitted to the governor
until long after a session adjourns. He said this approach keeps
everyone on an equal footing. MS. PARKER added that just keeping
track of when an individual can fund raise or can't fund raise
depending on when a bill is transmitted would be an almost
impossible task.
CHAIRMAN GREEN pointed out there's only 15 days in the whole year
after session adjourns and to the general election that would not
fall within 90 days before an election, and she questioned if it
necessary to keep that language in. MS. PARKER said the only
reason would be to protect the potential for abuse of calling the
legislature into session right before an election. Without the
exemption for the 90 days, candidates and incumbents would be
banned from fund raising any time the legislature was in a special
session. CHAIRMAN GREEN suggested it would simpler to delete
"special legislative session" from that language and just say
"...may not solicit or accept a contribution while convened in
regular session." MS. PARKER acknowledged that would be fine, but
the only reason they want this language is because it covers the
immediate sessions right after a regular session.
SENATOR DAVE DONLEY noted that one other good reason for having
that 90-day provision is that there is an emerging area of U.S.
constitutional law under which the First Amendment has been
interpreted as prohibiting overly restrictive fund raising time
periods and some of those cases have extended beyond a year into
the prior election year where courts have required that candidates
be allowed to raise money in prior years. He believes that 90 days
is a very conservative number of days to meet the First Amendment
requirements that may be mandated by the courts under the U.S.
Constitution.
BEN BROWN, staff to Senator Tim Kelly, added that the drafter of
the legislation thought that this solves the problem of the
confusion with the definition of what a special session is, what a
regular session is, and when a regular session is extended.
Number 303
SENATOR MILLER suggested holding the legislation in committee until
the following week because there was still some work being done
with the drafter on the bill. CHAIRMAN GREEN stated the CSSB
275(STA) would be held over to the following week.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|