Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/27/1996 01:36 PM Senate TRA
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
STRA - 2/27/96
SB 274 NOISE AT AIRPORTS & SPORT SHOOTING RANGES
Number 455
CHAIRMAN RIEGER introduced SB 274 as the next order of business
before the committee.
SENATOR HALFORD, Prime Sponsor, noted that the committee packet
should contain the sponsor statement, zero fiscal notes, and
letters of support from various groups. SB 274 would prohibit
suits against existing airports and sport shooting ranges for noise
nuisance. Noise cannot be used to sue facilities that predated the
objections.
SENATOR LINCOLN assumed that the sponsor statement's reference to
the population shift from urban to rural referred to the lower 48,
not Alaska. SENATOR HALFORD replied yes.
SENATOR HALFORD acknowledged that this is not a significant problem
in Alaska yet. The objective is to establish a policy in order to
eliminate the possibility of this becoming a problem. In response
to Senator Lincoln, Senator Halford stated that he had not seen a
specific example of this. There may be some areas that receive
complaints after the fact.
Number 424
CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if a municipality could not maintain an
action or does it refer only to an individual. SENATOR HALFORD
clarified that it would be exempt from a noise ordinance after the
fact. Senator Halford intended that all considerations other than
noise would remain available.
SENATOR GREEN asked if heliports should be specifically included as
suggested in the letter from the Alaska Air Carriers Association.
SENATOR HALFORD supported the inclusion of helicopter operations.
The drafter has suggested that a conceptual amendment could be used
to add a definition of "aircraft" which would include rotorcraft.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if the definition of sport shooting facility
referred to that being the primary operation of the facility.
SENATOR HALFORD assumed that it could also be an incidental
operation. That is a legal question.
CHAIRMAN RIEGER asked if the facility's sport shooting was
incidental, would changing the definition to specify that the sport
shooting must be the primary use of the facility would constitute
a substantial change in the use of the facility. SENATOR HALFORD
suggested that it would constitute a change of use. Senator
Halford reiterated that this only applies to noise considerations.
Number 379
SAM KITO III, Legislative Liaison for the Department of
Transportation & Public Facilities, said that the department has
some general concerns which could be addressed by the Federal
Aviation Administration. Mr. Kito asked the committee why state
airports were not included.
There was discussion about how to deal with the conceptual
amendment.
SENATOR GREEN moved the following amendment: page 2, line 29,
after "aircraft," add "including fixed wing or rotorcraft".
Hearing no objection, the amendment was adopted.
SENATOR GREEN moved that CSSB 274 (TRA) be moved out of committee
with individual recommendations. Hearing no objection, it was so
ordered.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|