Legislature(2009 - 2010)SENATE FINANCE 532
02/15/2010 09:00 AM Senate FINANCE
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB269 | |
| SB270 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | SB 269 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 270 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SENATE BILL NO. 270
"An Act relating to the dividend paid to the state by
the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation; and providing
for an effective date."
BRYAN BUTCHER, DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC
RELATIONS, ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION, DEPARTMENT OF
REVENUE, explained that sponsor statement.
SPONSOR STATEMENT
Senate Bill 270 will modify the Alaska Housing Finance
Corporation's transfer plan statutes to reflect federal
changes in generally accepted accounting principles.
House Bill 256 passed in 2003 that set in statute a
transfer plan for AHFC to pay an annual dividend to the
state of Alaska. The yearly dividend would be lesser of
$103 million or 75 percent of the Corporation's net
income for the previously completed fiscal year minus
bond repayments for state capital projects.
In 2006, Senate Bill 236 passed that made the first
adjustments to the transfer plan. This bill changed the
definition of "net income" to "adjusted change in net
assets", which reflected federal changes to generally
accepted accounting principles.
SB 270 will make another modification due to federal
changes in generally accepted accounting principles. It
will add to the definition of "adjusted change in net
assets" to include "temporary market value adjustments to
assets and liabilities made during the base fiscal year".
This change will allow for a true dollar figure for the
Corporation's dividend to be calculated from rather than
inaccurately high or low numbers based on how interest
rate swaps are now considered.
Co-Chair Stedman asked for an explanation of the interest
rate swap.
JOE DUBLER, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE, ALASKA HOUSING FINANCE
CORPORATION, explained that an interest rate swap is a
derivative financial instrument where the corporation enters
into a contract with a counter party where they are paid a
fixed rate in exchange for a variable rate. The variable
rate is based on an index. This allows for the selling of
variable rate bonds to hedge the change of interest rates
over the 30 year time period bonds are typically sold. The
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation has lowered the costs of
funds by entering these interest swaps.
Mr. Butcher remarked that SB 270 is a simple bill. Co-Chair
Stedman inquired if there have been any problems collecting
on the swaps. Mr. Dubler responded that currently the swaps
are marked to market every quarter for financial statement
presentation. If the swap out was closed today than it would
require a payment to the counter party.
Senator Olson asked who would want an interest rate switch
in light of the low interest rates on the world market. Mr.
Dubler answered that these swaps were entered into in 2001
through 2006 when the corporation saw the majority of the
mortgage activity was from home buyers. The mortgage market
started offering very sophisticated loan products to all
borrowers that caused the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
concern. The corporation decided to take on the risk
themselves because they had the expertise to take on these
types of transactions and pass the benefit to the borrowers
in the form of a lower interest rate. Most for-profit
corporations enter into some sort of interest rate hedge.
9:49:27 AM
Co-Chair Stedman remarked that many parties were caught by
surprise by the derivative market. Mr. Butcher remarked that
the corporation had three swaps with Lehman Brothers, but
when Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, the corporation wrote
them a check to purchase out of the position. The three
swaps were rebid and several million dollars were made in
the transaction.
9:50:38 AM
Co-Chair Stedman reported a zero fiscal note from the
Department of Revenue.
Senator Thomas asked if this was being made during base
fiscal year or on an annual basis.
Mr. Butcher responded that the adjustments are made
annually. This makes an adjustment from the financial
statements to what was originally agreed to in the transfer
plan. Accounts have made a lot of changes over the years
that have affected the agreement with the legislature over
what the dividend would be on an annual basis. The general
accounting principals have been modified to require the
corporation to include changes in the market value of
certain interest rate swaps. This was not part of the
original deal with the legislature. SB 270 asks to back this
modification out.
Senator Thomas inquired if it would be broader with the
changes.
Mr. Butcher explained there was another motivation from 1997
that required the corporation to bring booking marketable
debts securities to market. The change was immaterial to the
corporation's financial statements. The swap situation could
have large swings in value from quarter to quarter and the
corporation did not want a $10 million net increase in one
year affecting the dividend, then maybe a $10 million
decrease for the following year also affecting the dividend.
9:53:53 AM
Co-Chair Stedman questioned the corporation's intention of
going forward with derivatives.
Mr. Butcher responded that they would not be entering into
any more in the near future. The corporation's debt issuance
for this calendar year will consist mainly of some federal
bonds through 2010.
Co-Chair Stedman questioned the reason for not doing it
anymore. Mr. Butcher replied that the interest rate swaps
entered to date have been swaps that change a variable rate
debt into a fixed rate obligation of the corporation. The
variable rate debt market in the world has had some issues
with liquidity in the past year and a half. There have been
a lot of bond holders putting the bonds back into the
corporation and they have had to come up with the cash to
pay off their position. The variable rate interest rate
today is almost non-existent due to the shortage of
liquidity.
Co-Chair Stedman asked if these are standardized or non-
standardized contracts. Mr. Butcher remarked that the
general terms are standardized, but each firm has their own
way of doing business. Co-Chair Stedman asked Mr. Butcher to
explain the difference between a standardized and non-
standardized contract.
9:57:04 AM
Mr. Butcher explained that the liquidity facilities are an
agreement where the provider supplies liquidity for a
variable rate debt obligation. Bond holders have the right
every seven days to put the bonds back into the corporation;
therefore the corporation must have the money to pay those
bonds off. Since the corporation does not usually have that
large a sum of money available an agreement is entered into
with a bank to provide liquidity in case a bond holder wants
their money. There are then further agreements between the
corporation and the bank.
9:59:22 AM
Co-Chair Stedman understood the standardization, but the
transparency was not as apparent as many thought hence the
world financial situation. The state of Alaska did not get
hit as bad as many areas in the country, but comfort levels
are still not high.
SB270 was HEARD and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 270 AHFC Transfer Plan Sectional Analysis.pdf |
SFIN 2/15/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 270 |
| SB 270 AHFC transfer plan Sponsor Statement.pdf |
SFIN 2/15/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 270 |
| bondbank09annualreport.pdf |
SFIN 2/15/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 269 |
| February 15 2010wAIDEA_Presentation.ppt |
SFIN 2/15/2010 9:00:00 AM |
SB 269 |
| Agenda 021510.docx |
SFIN 2/15/2010 9:00:00 AM |