Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/06/2000 09:04 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 269
"An Act relating to the deadline for the submission of
monetary terms of collective bargaining contracts
between the state and a labor or employee organization
representing state employees to the legislature."
SENATOR PEARCE stated that SB 269 would modify current law
and set an April 1st deadline for the submission of
monetary terms included in collective bargaining agreements
negotiated by the State Employee Union. She continued that
often the Alaska Legislature finds itself receiving
monetary terms of contracts in the final days of session
often before they are able to look at the intricacies of
the different contracts. She noted that under the current
law, the legislature must make reasoned decisions involving
these contracts in an extremely short period of time. She
added that SB 269 allows the state to begin the negotiation
process whenever necessary, while still providing a
significant amount of time within a calendar year for
legislative review of the terms. She cited the case
University of Alaska vs. The Alaska Supreme Court, where it
was decided that monetary terms in collective bargaining
agreements do not become effective until the legislature
specifically funds them. She then gave the history of this
litigation.
Senator Leman asked how this legislation would affect the
legislature trying to limit session to a 90-day period. He
wondered if it would not accomplish the same thing by
stating that, "terms shall be submitted no later than 40
days before the constitutional deadline for regular
session," rather than specifying a date.
Co-Chair Parnell suggested that language could state that
the final contract terms must be in place so many days
following the commencement of the legislative session. A
general discussion about how this language should be
drafted took place.
Co-Chair Torgerson asked if the Committee should consider
an immediate effective date.
Senator Pearce responded affirmatively. She added that the
legislature usually responds to the monetary aspects of
these contracts, while there are changes to language should
be considered at the same.
Co-Chair Torgerson referred to page one, line ten, which
makes note of a calendar year, rather than a fiscal year.
Senator Pearce responded that if for some reason the
legislature did not deal with contractual terms, she
assumed that most governors would bring the body back for
special session. She noted that Alaska's session did work
on a calendar year and then weighed the pros and cons of
each calendar year versus a fiscal year.
Amendment #1: This amendment makes the following changes to
this legislation.
Page 1, line 1:
Delete "monetary terms of"
Page 1, line 9:
Delete "terms"
Insert "final contract"
Co-Chair Parnell made a motion to adopt Amendment #1. He
explained that this amendment would make clear the contract
language presented to the union members for ratification,
the same language that the administration will submit to
the legislature for appropriation purposes.
Senator Adams asked if all final contracts in this
situation would be arrived at by April 1, as noted in this
legislation and pointed out that the previous "terms"
language was a bit more general.
Co-Chair Parnell responded to this query with his previous
statement regarding language consistency.
Senator Adams pointed out that this legislation affected
numerous contracts and he wondered if negotiations could be
completed by April 1.
Co-Chair Torgerson responded that the unions are only
required to submit the monetary terms of an agreement to
the legislature within 10 days of final negotiations. He
added that the parties can adjust negotiations to arrive at
a new deadline regardless of what final date is chosen.
Co-Chair Torgerson hearing no objection ADOPTED Amendment
Senator Leman proposed a conceptual amendment, which would
read "40 days before the end of the constitutional
deadline," rather than a set date of April 1.
Senator Pearce felt as though so many days from the
beginning of session for a deadline might be a better
approach. She outlined her reasoning for this assessment.
There was additional discussion about the rational behind
an up-front session deadline or at the end of session
deadline for these employee contracts and how either of
these options would affect future constitutional language
changes to terms of session.
Amendment #2: This was a conceptual amendment which would
conceptually strike "April 1," on page one, line ten and
insert "45 days after the start of the legislative
session."
Senator Wilken made a motion to adopt Amendment #2.
Co-Chair Parnell responded that this language would square
with the language in existing law. There was additional
discussion about deadlines for contract negotiations.
Co-Chair Torgerson hearing no objection ADOPTED Amendment
Co-Chair Parnell made a motion to move SB 269, Version
LS1386\A as amended from the committee with individual
recommendations and attached zero fiscal note from the
Department of Administration.
Co-Chair Torgerson hearing no objection moved SB 269 FROM
THE COMMITTEE.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|