Legislature(1995 - 1996)
02/13/1996 01:30 PM Senate L&C
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SB 261 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
CHAIRMAN TIM KELLY called the Labor and Commerce Committee meeting
to order at 1:30 p.m. and announced SB 261 to be up for
consideration.
DWIGHT PERKINS, Department of Labor, said SB 261 makes several
changes to the Employment Security Act in six major areas: federal
income tax withholding; confidentiality of records; contributions
and collections; benefit overpayments; finality in determinations;
and appeals. In addition, the bill contains a few minor and
technical amendments.
The federal income tax withholding provision brings the Employment
Security Act into conformity with a new federal provision that
requires states to allow claimants to have income withheld from
benefits to cover their income tax liability.
The confidentiality of records section proposes changes to AS
23.20.110 and allows the Department to provide additional specific
unemployment insurance information to other entities under strict
disclosure guidelines. This exchange will support and enhance the
department's own programs as well as assist other state programs.
The information would be used only to protect the unemployment
compensation fund, enhance employment, training, and labor market
information programs. These changes do not rescind the public
disclosure prohibitions already in statute. The intent is to
increase efficiency of state government while retaining current
privacy safeguards.
Regarding contributions and collections, two provisions would
provide important tools for collecting delinquent contributions:
first from an employer who is at least two-quarters delinquent.
The bill also allows the department to enjoin a delinquent employer
who refuses to post a bond or pay contributions from operating as
an employer. The department would use these provisions when
existing remedies are not effective. These uncollectible accounts
are currently subsidized by the rest of Alaska's employers, who pay
contributions timely. In the benefit overpayment section, the
standard for waiving unemployment insurance overpayments would be
changed from great hardship to equity in good conscience. The new
standard would allow the department to consider other factors, such
as the degree of good faith in claiming benefits, and the
claimant's detrimental reliance on the benefits.
The bill would also permit the department to write off
uncollectible overpayments after two years. Practice has shown
that most recoverable overpayments are collected within two years.
The department would be given clear authority to correct any
determination during the benefit year of an unemployment claim.
This change will increase the accuracy of claim adjudication.
In the appeals section, a proposed amendment would provide a
uniform 30 day period for filing appeals from any determination
made by the department. The current 15 day period probably impacts
rural parties unfairly and may not allow enough time to review and
consider an appeal. The bill would also clarify the legal effect
of appeal decisions. It would make it clear that findings of fact,
and conclusions of law in unemployment hearings are not binding in
another proceeding. The purpose of this amendment is to prevent
parties from excessively litigating issues based on the effect the
department's ruling may have on a later civil litigation. Both the
30 day appeal provision, and the provision restricting the scope of
the department decisions, address concerns of a recent legislative
audit of the unemployment insurance appeals process.
Additional amendments would allow an insured worker to continue
receiving unemployment benefits while attending the funeral of an
immediate family member. The worker would be required to file a
compensable claim for the week, immediately before jury duty or
attendance at a funeral in order to receive an eligibility
exemption for those reasons. The bill also exempts extended
benefit claimants from the work search requirement while attending
an improved training course and corrects the definition of a
waiting week in the Employment Security Act, and clarifies the
treatment of cafeteria plan payments under the wage definition of
the Act.
Number 113
SENATOR KELLY asked Mr. Perkins to explain the cafeteria plan. MR.
PERKINS replied cafeteria plan payments are not considered wages so
long as the payments would not be otherwise treated as wages under
the Act. For example, payments made to a cafeteria plan for
retirement or medical expenses would not be considered wages.
SENATOR KELLY questioned whether those payments are considered as
income by the IRS and whether SB 261 would exempt them from being
considered as wages for the unemployment compensation program.
MR. PERKINS replied wages are considered to be the hourly pay wage.
The benefits are other compensable benefits.
SENATOR KELLY asked how compensable benefits are currently treated.
RON TORGERSON, a hearing officer with the Department of Labor,
testified that he was not sure what the taxable status of
compensable benefits is with respect to the employee, but they are
currently exempted from the Federal Insurance Contribution Act tax
and the federal unemployment tax. Since there are no federal
payroll taxes on those payments, SB 261 would harmonize the
Employment Security Act with the federal standard.
Number 151
SENATOR SALO asked if an Alaska employee who failed a urinalysis
drug test when applying for a job with the Department of
Transportation would be eligible for unemployment benefits. MR.
TORGERSON stated the Department of Labor does not have a standard
to apply to people that are going to take a job but fail the test.
There is no case law or statutory requirement that would support a
disqualification for refusing work.
SENATOR SALO said she was concerned with the difference between the
way the private and public sector treatment this issue.
CHRIS CHRISTENSEN, Alaska Court System, said they supported section
3. He said it would give the Department of Labor access to
information to determine eligibility for a public defender.
MARILYN MAY, Department of Labor, also supported section 3 of SB
261.
DOUG GARDNER, Collections, said section 3 would help them in
collecting on unpaid bills.
SENATOR KELLY asked why the Governor had a separate bill to amend
the benefit amount for unemployment.
MR. PERKINS explained that the benefit amount was a separate issue
from access to Department of Labor information.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|