Legislature(2007 - 2008)
03/12/2008 02:57 PM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB289 | |
| SB260 | |
| SB120 | |
| SB246 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 260(STA)
"An Act relating to a State Officers Compensation
Commission and establishing how legislators, the
governor, the lieutenant governor, and executive
department heads shall be compensated; providing for an
effective date by repealing the effective dates of
certain sections of ch. 124, SLA 1986; and providing
for an effective date."
REPRESENTATIVE MIKE DOOGAN, sponsor, reported that the bill
is an attempt to restore a compensation commission modeled
after a compensation commission in Alaska in the late
1970's, the last compensation system that worked. There are
several repealers in the bill that would take out some
aspects of current law. The bill would establish a
commission of five citizen members all appointed by the
Governor. One would be appointed from a list prepared by
the Speaker of the House, one from a list provided by the
President of the Senate, and the other three would be at
large members. None of the members can have served in a
position over which the commission has authority, for the
previous four years.
Representative Doogan explained that the bill covers the
Governor, the lieutenant governor, executive department
heads, and legislators. It is staffed by the Department of
Administration. There is a fiscal note for $7,500. The law
requires the commission to report at least every two years.
It does not require that the report change compensation.
The recommendations of the commission take affect unless
they are specifically rejected by the legislature. The
legislature retains authority over what happens to
compensation because it does require a specific
appropriation to fund it. This is not an arrangement
peculiar to Alaska. He referred to a report in members'
packets from the National Council of State Legislators.
4:05:31 PM
Senator Thomas asked about the legal services memorandum.
Representative Doogan recalled that in the House State
Affairs Committee, a question was raised whether or not this
legislation should be a resolution. The letter is a legal
opinion that it should be a bill.
Co-Chair Stedman asked if a sunset provision is needed.
Representative Doogan hoped it would continue into infinity,
if it works. If there are problems, it can be removed from
statute.
Co-Chair Hoffman noted that the commissioner's
recommendations would take effect unless rejected by the
legislature. He wondered if that would include the first
recommendation. Representative Doogan said it would.
Senator Elton asked if "executive department head" refers to
commissioners. Representative Doogan thought that was the
language needed to refer to commissioners.
Co-Chair Stedman noted the small fiscal note. He said he
would refer the bill to a finance subcommittee made up of
Senator Elton - Chair, Senator Olson, and Senator Dyson.
He felt there was a relationship between the salary
structure and some of the recent improprieties.
CSHB 260(STA) was heard and HELD in Committee for further
consideration.
4:10:22 PM
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|