Legislature(2023 - 2024)ADAMS 519
05/13/2024 10:00 AM House FINANCE
Note: the audio
and video
recordings are distinct records and are obtained from different sources. As such there may be key differences between the two. The audio recordings are captured by our records offices as the official record of the meeting and will have more accurate timestamps. Use the icons to switch between them.
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| HB400 | |
| SB205 | |
| SB170 | |
| SB259 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| += | HB 400 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 205 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 170 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 151 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 259 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 183 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 34 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 29 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 275 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 99 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 149 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 159 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 196 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 24 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 12 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 204 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 259 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 174 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | HB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 397 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | HB 396 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED |
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 259(FIN)
"An Act relating to the compensation of state
employees; relating to the salary of the chief
administrative law judge; and providing for an
effective date."
12:27:09 PM
SENATOR ELVI GRAY-JACKSON, SPONSOR, explained that SB 259
was a technical cleanup bill unanimously approved by
Legislative Council on February 28, 2024, to be introduced
as a committee bill. She delineated that HB 226 (Pay
Increases For Certain State Employees, Chapter 50 SLA 22,
08/01/22) passed in 2022, sponsored by Representative Andy
Josephson and included an amendment by the former
Representative Steve Thompson. The amendment granted
certain state employees not covered by a bargaining unit to
receive salary adjustments in line with the Supervisory
Bargaining Units negotiated agreement. Unfortunately, the
Department of Law (DOL) argued that the bill language did
not allow the Department of Administration (DOA) to
implement the salary changes for 2,800 exempt and partially
exempt employees across the legislative, executive, and
judicial branches. She noted the legal memo from
Legislative Legal Services dated March 4, 2024 (copy on
file) was included in member's bill packets. Senate Bill
259 clarified and confirmed the original intent by
providing clear authority to DOA to adjust salaries as
intended. The legislation amended AS 39.27.011(m) to ensure
the salary adjustments would happen without legislative
intervention.
She continued that some substantial changes were made in
the Senate Finance Committee: retroactive pay provisions
were removed that eliminated the need for supplemental
funding. Additionally, the bill included a section that
removed the existing salary cap on the pay scale of the
Chief Administrative Law Judge. She furthered that the
adjustment was necessary in order to attract and retain
qualified individuals. She informed the committee that
there was a letter of support from the DOA commissioner
[Commissioner Paula Vrana]. She shared that recently, the
supervisory bargain unit reached an agreement with the
state. She indicated that based on the agreement the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) included a new fiscal note.
She concluded that the bill fulfilled a commitment the
legislature made to state employees and the bill "stood as
a testament to fairness and equity" and reflected
appreciation for their service to the state. She listed the
invited testifiers available to answer questions.
12:30:48 PM
Co-Chair Foster OPENED public testimony.
Co-Chair Foster CLOSED public testimony.
12:31:54 PM
LAURA B. TIMKO, CHIEF POLICY ANALYST, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT
AND BUDGET, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, explained the OMB
fiscal impact for all branches of government [Various] and
all fund sources. The fiscal note total was $22.220.9
million, which was broken down on the analysis on the
second page.
Co-Chair Foster indicated that there was an amendment to
the bill.
12:34:40 PM
Co-Chair Foster MOVED Amendment 1.
Representative Cronk OBJECTED for discussion.
BRODIE ANDERSON, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER,
explained Amendment 1 was sponsored by Co-Chair Foster. He
communicated that the amendment identified as 33-LS1475\R.1
better reflected the final agreement that was accepted by
the Supervisory Unit. The bill was written before the
negotiations were completed. The unit included a step
increase for its employees, but due to the difficulty of
translating the increase into the same amount of increase
for the exempt employees an amendment was necessary. The
amendment calculated a 3.38 percent increase that reflected
the step increase received by the Supervisory Unit
employees. The current bill reflected a 5 percent increase
on July 1, 2024. On July 8, 2024 the step increase would be
implemented as per Amendment 1. In addition, subsection (o)
and subsection (p) included the negotiated increases in
2025 and 2026. He summarized that the Supervisory Unit
agreement was reflected as closely as possible in the bill
with the adoption of Amendment 1.
Co-Chair Foster felt that Amendment 1 was a technical
amendment but also substantive.
12:37:48 PM
PAUL LABOLLE, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE NEAL FOSTER, summarized
that the amendment mirrored the final negotiation of the
Supervisory Unit agreement, and the substantive effect was
the 3.38 percent step increase. He elaborated that
historically, the exempt employees did not participate in
contract negotiations and salary adjustments had to be
handled through legislation that was typically based on the
Supervisory Unit negotiated agreement.
Representative Coulombe asked for clarity regarding the
total wage increase.
Mr. Anderson responded that the overall increase would be
an 8.3 percent increase calculated by the 5 percent
included in the original bill and the step increase of 3.3
percent.
Mr. Labolle clarified the difference between a step and
range increase. He explained that a range increase was in
the underlying bill and the step increase was in the
amendment.
Senator Gray Jackson stated her support for the amendment.
Representative Cronk REMOVED his objection.
There being no objection, Amendment 1 was adopted.
12:40:29 PM
Co-Chair Edgmon MOVED to REPORT HCS CSSB 259(FIN) out of
committee with individual recommendations and the
accompanying fiscal note.
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.
HCS CSSB 259(FIN) was REPORTED out of committee with ten
"do pass" recommendations and with one new indeterminate
fiscal note from the Office of the Governor for Various.
12:41:03 PM
Senator Gray Jackson thanked the committee.
Co-Chair Foster recessed the meeting to the following day
at 9:00 a.m.
12:41:26 PM
RECESSED
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| SB 259 Amendment #1 Foster 051324.pdf |
HFIN 5/13/2024 10:00:00 AM |
SB 259 |
| SB 205 Public Testimony Rec'd by 050724.pdf |
HFIN 5/13/2024 10:00:00 AM |
SB 205 |