Legislature(1999 - 2000)
04/12/2000 09:07 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
SENATE BILL NO. 257
"An Act relating to notice requirements for certain
final findings concerning the disposal of an interest
in state land or resources for oil and gas; relating
to administrative appeals and petitions for
reconsideration of decisions of the Department of
Natural Resources; and providing for an effective
date."
BOB LOEFFLER, Director, Division of Mining, Land and Water,
Department of Natural Resources, explained the bill does
two things, creates a uniform appeals process for the
Department of Natural Resources and corrects a notice
problem for the Division of Oil and Gas.
Mr. Loeffler explained the problems that precipitated this
bill. He stated that for a variety of reasons, different
laws have been passed over several years, and because of
the way they interact, there is a variety of appeals
processes within the department. He noted that these
different processes follow different schedules with 15 - 30
days allowed to file an appeal. The different processes, he
added require different channels and opportunities for
appeals. He remarked that this causes confusion for the
public and for department staff. He stated that this bill
establishes there is only one appeal process, one appeal to
the commissioner and the next appeal made in court.
Mr. Loeffler continued with the second problem relating to
notices for lease sales stating that there are currently
three notices. He detailed these notices. As a result, he
said the public is confused and there is additional cost
for publishing the multiple notices.
Co-Chair Torgerson asked why this bill does not have a
negative fiscal note.
Mr. Loeffler responded that the Division of Oil and Gas has
a higher workload this year, and the intent is to use the
small cost savings from this legislation to pay for the
other operations. The savings anticipated by other
divisions, he said are spread between many employees and
would be difficult to identify. He stated that because the
department had a $750,000 budget reduction, "we're just
struggling to keep up."
Co-Chair Torgerson asked if the fiscal note therefore has
nothing to do with the bill but rather with the
department's desire to save money to be spent elsewhere
within the department.
Mr. Loeffler repeated that the savings would be difficult
to calculate.
Senator Leman asked how much the department spends annually
on public notices.
Mr. Loeffler did not know the entire cost but knew that the
intermediate notice is a few thousand dollars for each oil
and gas lease sale. He noted that the department offers "a
few" of these sales each year.
Senator Leman was interested in reducing costs and stated
that if this bill could allow the department to save money,
he supported it. He suggested a conceptual amendment to
remove the appeals process from the bill and maintain only
the public notice portion.
Co-Chair Torgerson wanted the amendment offered on the
Senate floor.
Co-Chair Parnell pointed out that the Committee has in its
possession, another bill that contains this language.
Co-Chair Parnell offered a motion to report from Committee,
SB 257, 1-GS2046.A with accompanying zero fiscal note from
the Department of Natural Resources.
Without objection, the bill MOVED from Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|