Legislature(1999 - 2000)
03/27/2000 09:07 AM Senate FIN
| Audio | Topic |
|---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 256(HES)
"An Act relating to regulation of managed health care
and allowing physicians to collectively negotiate with
a health benefit plan that has substantial market
power."
This was the second hearing for this bill in the Senate
Finance Committee.
BECKY CERNEY, Director of State Legislation, American
Medical Association based in Chicago, Illinois testified to
the alarming trend with the increased number of unfair
contracting provisions that hamper the ability for
physicians to provide proper care. She said some of the
contract provisions related to the ability to refer
patients to specialists, administer certain medications and
interpreting what medically necessary care is in the best
interest of the patient.
Ms. Cerney shared that the efforts to correct these
provisions have been unsuccessful resulting in 13 states,
including Alaska, that have introduced legislation to
permit physicians to enter into contract negotiations as a
collective group.
Ms. Cerney told the Committee it might hear from
representatives of the insurance industry saying that
physicians are already permitted to negotiate over
contracts. That is not true, she stressed, citing that two
or more physicians are prohibited under the anti-trust law
from coming together to negotiate over contracting
provisions. She suggested the representatives could be
referring to the ability of independently practicing
physicians to come together. She remarked that this
provision was ineffective because it asks physicians to
give up "their practice autonomy" for the purpose of coming
together to discuss these matters. She said that the cost
of forming these units was over $1 million.
Ms. Cerney asserted that physicians needed to be allowed
another way to negotiate for provisions that are most
affective for their patients. She stated that this bill
would enable physicians to deliver the care that is most
proper to their patients.
Ms. Cerney spoke to the strong trend in the nation with to
adopt statewide regulations to address this matter. She
added that six additional states were "watching and
waiting" and that this was a good opportunity for Alaska to
help its patients.
Senator Green asked if any practices currently in place in
Alaska were based on the Medicare model with restrictions
on provided services, unauthorized prescriptions, etc.
Ms. Cerney would have to defer to someone in Alaska's
medical industry.
Senator Green commented that a major concern of many
physicians related to Medicare restrictions and she wanted
to know if the insurance companies' restrictions were
nearly as egregious as those were.
Ms. Cerney spoke to her experience with Medicare provisions
and stated that said some are much more favorable than
those imposed by some private sector insurance providers.
Co-Chair Parnell noted the primary criticism of this bill
is that the health care costs would rise and asked the
witness to address the matter.
Ms. Cerney asserted that argument is raised for every
legislation pertaining to managed care regulation. She
admitted there is a provision in this bill that would
submit the oversight entity, the attorney general, to
impose a fee to cover the administrative review. If this
bill were to result in premium increases, she said she
would be "astounded" and that other threats of increased
costs have proven untrue.
Co-Chair Parnell asked which states or studies should the
Committee refer to with regard to increase costs.
Ms. Cerney answered there are a number of studies that came
out of the managed care liability legislation that can be
applied to other types of legislation. She cited a study
for the Kaiser Family Foundation that projected cost
increases associated with liability legislation would be
between three to 13 cents per member per month. She said
the actual outcome of the liability legislation were even
less because there has been less litigation than expected.
Senator P. Kelly asked what would be the affect on cost of
a state action doctrine that did not include fees He had
heard that a similar doctrine had been attempted elsewhere.
Ms. Cerney replied that it was impossible to separate the
two issues from any bill. She explained that whenever
contractual items were negotiated, it would be necessary to
look at the contract in its entirety. She stated there are
a number of instances of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
pursues physicians for negotiating over an individual
provision because it is assumed that any negotiations would
affect the physicians' reimbursement.
Co-Chair Torgerson noted those on teleconference.
Co-Chair Torgerson asked Senator P. Kelly to prepare a
committee substitute that incorporates all five submitted
amendments rather than having the Committee act upon each
one. [Copy of amendments on file.]
Co-Chair Torgerson ordered the bill HELD in Committee.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|